Suppr超能文献

布雷哌唑治疗青少年精神分裂症的疗效与安全性:一项有活性对照的多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照3期试验

Efficacy and safety of brexpiprazole in adolescents with schizophrenia: a multicountry, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial with an active reference.

作者信息

Ward Caroline, Pejović Milovančević Milica, Kohegyi Eva, Hefting Nanco, Aurang Catherine, Chen Dalei, Larsen Klaus Groes, Hobart Mary, Correll Christoph U

机构信息

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; Institute of Mental Health, Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Lancet Psychiatry. 2025 May;12(5):345-354. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(25)00043-4. Epub 2025 Apr 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

New treatment options are needed for adolescent schizophrenia, partly due to an unfavourable risk-benefit profile of current options. This trial aimed to evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of brexpiprazole in adolescents with schizophrenia.

METHODS

This multicountry, randomised, double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial with an active reference was done at 62 outpatient sites in ten countries. Eligible patients were aged 13-17 years with a primary DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia and a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score ≥80 at screening and baseline. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to oral brexpiprazole 2-4 mg/day, placebo, or aripiprazole 10-20 mg/day (active reference). Patients, investigators, and sponsor personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to week 6 in PANSS total score (in randomly assigned patients who took at least one dose of study drug and had baseline and post-baseline PANSS evaluations). Safety was assessed in randomly assigned patients who took at least one dose of study drug. People with lived experience of schizophrenia were not involved in the research or writing process. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03198078, and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between June 29, 2017, and Feb 23, 2023, 376 patients were screened, and 316 patients were randomly assigned to brexpiprazole (n=110), placebo (n=104), or aripiprazole (n=102). The mean age of patients was 15·3 years (SD 1·5). 166 (53%) of 316 patients were female and 150 (47%) were male. Of 316 patients, seven (2%) were American Indian or Alaskan Native, two (1%) were Asian, 21 (7%) were Black or African American, 204 (65%) were White, and 81 (26%) were other, as reported using US Census Bureau classifications. Mean doses of brexpiprazole and aripiprazole at last visit were 3·0 mg (SD 0·9) and 13·9 mg (4·7), respectively. Least squares mean change from baseline to week 6 in PANSS total score was -22·8 (SE 1·5) with brexpiprazole and -17·4 (1·6) with placebo (least squares mean difference -5·33 [95% CI -9·55 to -1·10]; p=0·014). The corresponding PANSS total score change at week 6 with aripiprazole was -24·0 (SE 1·6; least squares mean difference versus placebo -6·53 [95% CI -10·8 to -2·21]; p=0·0032, not adjusted for multiple testing). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 44 (40%) of 110 patients in the brexpiprazole group, 42 (40%) of 104 in the placebo group, and 53 (52%) of 102 in the aripiprazole group. The most common (incidence ≥5%) treatment-emergent adverse events were headache (n=7) and nausea (n=7) with brexpiprazole and somnolence (n=11), fatigue (n=8), and akathisia (n=7) with aripiprazole. Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by one (1%) of 110 patients in the brexpiprazole group, three (3%) of 104 in the placebo group, and one (1%) of 102 in the aripiprazole group. No deaths were reported.

INTERPRETATION

In adolescents with schizophrenia, brexpiprazole 2-4 mg/day was associated with greater reduction in symptom severity than placebo over 6 weeks. The safety profile of brexpiprazole in adolescents was consistent with trials in adult patients. These results add to the body of evidence for brexpiprazole in adolescents with schizophrenia and might help to inform treatment selection in clinical practice.

FUNDING

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization and H Lundbeck.

摘要

背景

青少年精神分裂症需要新的治疗选择,部分原因是当前治疗方法的风险效益比不理想。本试验旨在评估布雷哌唑对青少年精神分裂症患者的短期疗效和安全性。

方法

这项多中心、随机、双盲、平行组、安慰剂对照、有活性对照的3期试验在10个国家的62个门诊地点进行。符合条件的患者年龄为13 - 17岁,根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM - 5)初步诊断为精神分裂症,筛查和基线时阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)总分≥80。患者被随机分配(1:1:1)至口服布雷哌唑2 - 4毫克/天、安慰剂或阿立哌唑10 - 20毫克/天(活性对照)。患者、研究者和申办方人员均对治疗分配不知情。主要疗效终点是从基线到第6周PANSS总分的变化(在随机分配且至少服用一剂研究药物并进行了基线和基线后PANSS评估的患者中)。对至少服用一剂研究药物的随机分配患者进行安全性评估。有精神分裂症生活经历的人未参与研究或撰写过程。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号为NCT03198078,且已完成。

研究结果

2017年6月29日至2023年2月23日期间,共筛查了376例患者,316例患者被随机分配至布雷哌唑组(n = 110)、安慰剂组(n = 104)或阿立哌唑组(n = 102)。患者的平均年龄为15.3岁(标准差1.5)。316例患者中,166例(53%)为女性,150例(47%)为男性。根据美国人口普查局的分类报告,316例患者中,7例(2%)为美国印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民,2例(1%)为亚洲人,21例(7%)为黑人或非裔美国人,204例(65%)为白人,81例(26%)为其他种族。末次访视时,布雷哌唑和阿立哌唑的平均剂量分别为3.0毫克(标准差0.9)和13.9毫克(4.7)。布雷哌唑组从基线到第6周PANSS总分的最小二乘均值变化为 - 22.8(标准误1.5),安慰剂组为 - 17.4(1.6)(最小二乘均值差异 - 5.33 [95%置信区间 - 9.55至 - 1.10];p = 0.014)。阿立哌唑组第6周PANSS总分的相应变化为 - 24.0(标准误1.6;与安慰剂的最小二乘均值差异 - 6.53 [95%置信区间 - 10.8至 - 2.21];p = 0.0032,未进行多重检验校正)。布雷哌唑组110例患者中有44例(40%)报告了治疗中出现的不良事件,安慰剂组104例中有42例(40%),阿立哌唑组102例中有53例(52%)。最常见(发生率≥5%)的治疗中出现的不良事件,布雷哌唑组为头痛(n = 7)和恶心(n = 7),阿立哌唑组为嗜睡(n = 11)、疲劳(n = 8)和静坐不能(n = 7)。布雷哌唑组110例患者中有1例(1%)报告了严重的治疗中出现的不良事件,安慰剂组104例中有3例(3%),阿立哌唑组102例中有1例(1%)。未报告死亡病例。

解读

在青少年精神分裂症患者中,每天服用2 - 4毫克布雷哌唑在6周内比安慰剂能更显著地减轻症状严重程度。布雷哌唑在青少年中的安全性与在成年患者中的试验结果一致。这些结果为布雷哌唑治疗青少年精神分裂症增添了证据,并可能有助于指导临床实践中的治疗选择。

资助

大冢制药开发与商业化公司和H. 伦德贝克公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验