Lin Ching-Hsuan, Campbell Jonathan D, Motyka James, Cohen Joshua T
Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
National Pharmaceutical Council, Washington, DC, USA.
Value Health. 2025 Apr 8. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2025.03.008.
Most cost-effectiveness analyses assume that a drug's price remains unchanged after launch. Because prices typically change, this assumption can distort cost-effectiveness projections. Limited data on how prices change over a drug's life cycle have limited the inclusion of dynamic pricing assumptions. This study characterized changes in drug prices after launch and before loss of market exclusivity.
We analyzed inflation-adjusted price data for 32 brand-name drugs that contribute substantially to US healthcare spending. We developed 2 regression models: (1) an ordinary least squares regression model to estimate average annual price changes after launch and (2) a linear mixed-effects regression to project how prices change over time. We identified independent factors potentially influencing price changes based on a literature review. We selected factors for model inclusion based on Akaike Information Criterion improvements. Net price data came from SSR Health.
The average inflation-adjusted mean annual drug price change was -4.7% (median: -2.4%). The ordinary least squares model predicted negative mean annual price changes for all combinations of drug characteristics except for drugs with Medicare-protected class designations (P value < .01), all else equal. Both models identified drug characteristics associated with smaller price declines or with price increases; the mixed-effects model indicated that price change rates tend to moderate with more time since launch.
For large-market branded drugs, inflation-adjusted prices often decline after launch and before loss of market exclusivity. Empirical modeling helps to refine projections based on observable characteristics, thus facilitating incorporation of dynamic pricing into cost-effectiveness analyses.
大多数成本效益分析假定药物上市后价格保持不变。由于价格通常会发生变化,这一假设可能会扭曲成本效益预测。关于药物在其生命周期内价格变化的数据有限,这限制了动态定价假设的纳入。本研究描述了药物上市后至失去市场独占权前的价格变化情况。
我们分析了对美国医疗保健支出有重大影响的32种品牌药经通胀调整后的价格数据。我们开发了两个回归模型:(1)一个普通最小二乘回归模型,用于估计上市后平均每年的价格变化;(2)一个线性混合效应回归模型,用于预测价格随时间的变化。我们根据文献综述确定了可能影响价格变化的独立因素。我们根据赤池信息准则的改进情况选择纳入模型的因素。净价格数据来自SSR Health。
经通胀调整后的药物平均年价格变化为-4.7%(中位数:-2.4%)。在其他条件相同的情况下,普通最小二乘模型预测,除具有医疗保险保护类别指定的药物外,所有药物特征组合的平均年价格变化均为负(P值<0.01)。两个模型都确定了与较小价格下降或价格上涨相关的药物特征;混合效应模型表明,自上市以来时间越长,价格变化率往往越趋于平缓。
对于大型市场的品牌药,经通胀调整后的价格在上市后至失去市场独占权前通常会下降。实证建模有助于根据可观察到的特征完善预测,从而便于将动态定价纳入成本效益分析。