Suppr超能文献

出院后支持艾滋病病毒感染者的干预措施:一项系统评价

Interventions to Support People With HIV Following Hospital Discharge: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Ford Nathan, Rangaraj Ajay, Jarvis Joseph N, Lawrence David S, Chou Roger, Kamenshchikova Alena, Hargreaves Sally, Burke Rachael M

机构信息

Department of HIV, Viral Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Centre for Integrated Data and Epidemiological Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 20;12(4):ofaf175. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf175. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Individuals hospitalized with HIV-related complications face high post-discharge mortality and morbidity, particularly in resource-limited settings. This systematic review evaluated the impact of interventions to reduce post-hospital mortality, lower readmissions, and improve linkage to care.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to 1 October 2024 for studies reporting outcomes of post-discharge interventions. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We pooled data using random effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We included 4 randomized controlled trials (conducted in Spain, South Africa, Tanzania, and the United States) and 6 observational studies (Canada, Thailand, Zambia, and the United States). Interventions included pre-discharge counseling, medication review, referral to care, and goal setting, as well as post-discharge follow-up via home visits, telephone calls, and support from social workers or community health workers. Pooled data from randomized controlled trials showed no difference between post-discharge interventions and usual care in mortality, but the estimate was imprecise (relative risk [RR], 0.98; 95% CI, .59-1.63). However, interventions may reduce readmissions (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, .52-1.30) and may slightly improve linkage/retention in care (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, .95-1.27). Observational studies reported similar results, with no mortality effect but potential reductions in readmissions (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, .48-1.25) and improved linkage/retention (RR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.11-1.81). Interventions were largely feasible, acceptable, and low cost.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions that include pre-discharge care planning and post-discharge follow-up, such as telephone contact and home visits, may improve linkage to care and reduce readmissions. However, interventions were not associated with reduced post-discharge mortality.

摘要

背景

因艾滋病相关并发症住院的患者出院后面临较高的死亡率和发病率,在资源有限的环境中尤其如此。本系统评价评估了旨在降低出院后死亡率、减少再入院率以及改善与医疗服务联系的干预措施的影响。

方法

我们检索了截至2024年10月1日的PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库,以查找报告出院后干预措施结果的研究。两名独立的评审员进行研究筛选、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。我们使用随机效应荟萃分析对数据进行汇总。

结果

我们纳入了4项随机对照试验(分别在西班牙、南非、坦桑尼亚和美国开展)和6项观察性研究(加拿大、泰国、赞比亚和美国)。干预措施包括出院前咨询、药物审查、转诊至医疗服务机构、设定目标,以及通过家访、电话随访以及社会工作者或社区卫生工作者提供的支持进行出院后随访。随机对照试验的汇总数据显示,出院后干预措施与常规护理在死亡率方面无差异,但估计值不精确(相对风险[RR],0.98;95%置信区间,0.59 - 1.63)。然而,干预措施可能会减少再入院率(RR,0.82;95%置信区间,0.52 - 1.30),并可能略微改善与医疗服务的联系/留存率(RR,1.10;95%置信区间,0.95 - 1.27)。观察性研究报告了类似的结果,即对死亡率无影响,但可能降低再入院率(RR,0.77;95%置信区间,0.48 - 1.25),并改善联系/留存率(RR,1.42;95%置信区间,1.11 - 1.81)。干预措施在很大程度上是可行的、可接受的且成本较低。

结论

包括出院前护理计划和出院后随访(如电话联系和家访)在内的干预措施,可能会改善与医疗服务的联系并减少再入院率。然而,这些干预措施与降低出院后死亡率无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb3/11983270/99e677f8a8d6/ofaf175f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验