Chen Jianhua, Chen Si, Zhu Yi-Cheng
Department of Neurology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; and.
Neurol Educ. 2025 Apr 9;4(2):e200214. doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200214. eCollection 2025 Jun.
EEG interpretation is crucial for residents. However, studies indicated poor competency among residents in interpreting EEGs. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the current state and effectiveness of EEG education for residents.
A literature search was conducted in electronic bibliographic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Official websites of organizations including the International League Against Epilepsy, American Clinical Neurophysiology Society, American Epilepsy Society, International Child Neurology Association, Canadian Society of Clinical Neurophysiologists, and China Association Against Epilepsy were also searched for information on EEG education. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses methodologic standards for reporting systematic reviews were followed. The inclusion criteria of the articles were those that evaluated the effectiveness of EEG education or surveyed the status of EEG training for residents. Methodologic quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions, Version 2, tool. A meta-analysis of eligible studies was performed to compare precurriculum and postcurriculum test scores.
A total of 28,024 articles were identified of which 38 were included in the systematic review and 14 in the meta-analysis. EEG education methodologies varied widely. EEG curricula covered a range of topics, from fundamentals and advancements in EEG technology and interpretations to signal analysis, seizure semiology, and clinical applications for patients with epilepsy. There was a significant improvement in posttest scores compared with pretest scores, with a pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of 1.76 (95% CI 1.14-2.39, < 0.00001). A subgroup analysis of neurology residents, based on 8 studies, showed a pooled SMD of 0.97 (95% CI 0.73-1.22, < 0.00001).
EEG education significantly improves residents' test scores and enhances their diagnostic skills of seizures. Future research should focus on evaluating the long-term retention of EEG knowledge following training, particularly regarding specialties.
脑电图解读对住院医师至关重要。然而,研究表明住院医师在解读脑电图方面能力欠佳。我们进行了这项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估针对住院医师的脑电图教育的现状和效果。
在包括PubMed、EMBASE、科学网和考克兰图书馆在内的电子文献数据库中进行文献检索。还检索了包括国际抗癫痫联盟、美国临床神经生理学会、美国癫痫学会、国际儿童神经学会、加拿大临床神经生理学家协会和中国抗癫痫协会等组织的官方网站,以获取有关脑电图教育的信息。遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目方法学标准来报告系统评价。纳入文章的标准是那些评估脑电图教育效果或调查住院医师脑电图培训状况的文章。使用干预性非随机研究中的偏倚风险工具第2版评估方法学质量。对符合条件的研究进行荟萃分析,以比较课程前和课程后的测试成绩。
共识别出28,024篇文章,其中38篇纳入系统评价,14篇纳入荟萃分析。脑电图教育方法差异很大。脑电图课程涵盖了一系列主题,从脑电图技术和解读的基础与进展到信号分析、癫痫发作症状学以及癫痫患者的临床应用。与课前成绩相比,课后成绩有显著提高,合并标准化均数差(SMD)为1.76(95%CI 1.14 - 2.39,P < 0.00001)。基于8项研究对神经科住院医师进行的亚组分析显示,合并SMD为0.97(95%CI 0.73 - 1.22,P < 0.00001)。
脑电图教育显著提高了住院医师的测试成绩,并增强了他们对癫痫发作的诊断技能。未来的研究应侧重于评估培训后脑电图知识的长期留存情况,尤其是在专业方面。