• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于糖尿病管理的海迪亚糖尿病助手大剂量计算器的临床性能:一项真实世界回顾性队列研究。

Clinical performance of Hedia Diabetes Assistant bolus calculator for diabetes management: a real-world retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Pedersen Kenney Fehrenkamp, Østerskov Anne, Nielsen Sabrina Mai, Karagkounis Gkikas, Knudsen Astrid Karnøe

机构信息

Clinical and Medical Affairs, Hedia ApS, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Front Digit Health. 2025 Mar 27;7:1430744. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1430744. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1430744
PMID:40212899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11983442/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Individuals living with type 1 diabetes are at risk of long-term complications related to chronic hyperglycemia. Tight glycemic control is recommended but can increase the risk of iatrogenic hypoglycemia. Hedia Diabetes Assistant (HDA) is a bolus calculator that provides users with bolus insulin recommendations based on personalized settings. We aimed to investigate the effects of HDA on a known risk index of hypoglycemia.

METHODS

New users from 2019 to 2021 were included if they fulfilled the following criteria: age ≥18 years, ≥5 logs/1st week of use, and ≥1 log for glucose, carbohydrate, and insulin. User data was extracted from the HDA database. The prespecified primary endpoint was change in the Low Blood Glucose Index (LBGI) after 12 weeks of use. Secondary endpoints were changes in the High Blood Glucose Index (HBGI) and eA1c. An exploratory endpoint was to maintain potential improvements in LBGI after 25 weeks. A repeated-measures mixed model with a log-transformation was used.

RESULTS

A total of 1,342 users were included. The mean age was 43.4 years (SD 14.7) with 52.3% being female. After 12 weeks, LBGI significantly improved from 0.73 to 0.61 (17% decrease,  < 0.001) with no significant changes in HBGI, and eA1c. From week 12 to 25, LBGI decreased from 0.61 to 0.55 (10%,  = 0.107).

CONCLUSIONS

Users of HDA experienced statistically significant improvement in LBGI after 12 weeks with no changes in HBGI and eA1c, which was successfully maintained after 25 weeks. These results suggest a decreased risk of hypoglycemia when using HDA.

摘要

引言

1型糖尿病患者面临与慢性高血糖相关的长期并发症风险。建议严格控制血糖,但这可能会增加医源性低血糖的风险。Hedia糖尿病助手(HDA)是一种推注计算器,可根据个性化设置为用户提供推注胰岛素建议。我们旨在研究HDA对已知低血糖风险指数的影响。

方法

纳入2019年至2021年的新用户,需满足以下标准:年龄≥18岁,使用第一周记录≥5次,血糖、碳水化合物和胰岛素记录≥1次。用户数据从HDA数据库中提取。预先设定的主要终点是使用12周后低血糖指数(LBGI)的变化。次要终点是高血糖指数(HBGI)和糖化血红蛋白(eA1c)的变化。一个探索性终点是在25周后维持LBGI的潜在改善。使用了带有对数转换的重复测量混合模型。

结果

共纳入1342名用户。平均年龄为43.4岁(标准差14.7),女性占52.3%。12周后,LBGI从0.73显著改善至0.61(降低17%,<0.001),HBGI和eA1c无显著变化。从第12周到第25周,LBGI从0.61降至0.55(降低10%,P = 0.107)。

结论

HDA用户在使用12周后LBGI有统计学意义上的显著改善,HBGI和eA1c无变化,并在25周后成功维持。这些结果表明使用HDA时低血糖风险降低。

相似文献

1
Clinical performance of Hedia Diabetes Assistant bolus calculator for diabetes management: a real-world retrospective cohort study.用于糖尿病管理的海迪亚糖尿病助手大剂量计算器的临床性能:一项真实世界回顾性队列研究。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Mar 27;7:1430744. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1430744. eCollection 2025.
2
Carbohydrate counting with an automated bolus calculator helps to improve glycaemic control in children with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily injection therapy: an 18-month observational study.使用自动化推注计算器进行碳水化合物计数有助于改善接受多次每日注射治疗的 1 型糖尿病儿童的血糖控制:一项为期 18 个月的观察性研究。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Mar;103(3):388-94. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.12.026. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
3
Impact of Use Frequency of a Mobile Diabetes Management App on Blood Glucose Control: Evaluation Study.移动糖尿病管理应用程序使用频率对血糖控制的影响:评估研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Mar 7;7(3):e11933. doi: 10.2196/11933.
4
Sensitivity of Traditional and Risk-Based Glycemic Variability Measures to the Effect of Glucose-Lowering Treatment in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.传统血糖变异性测量方法和基于风险的血糖变异性测量方法对2型糖尿病降糖治疗效果的敏感性
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jun 15;9(6):1227-35. doi: 10.1177/1932296815587014.
5
Continuous Glucose Monitors and Activity Trackers to Inform Insulin Dosing in Type 1 Diabetes: The University of Virginia Contribution.连续血糖监测仪和活动追踪器在 1 型糖尿病胰岛素剂量调整中的应用:弗吉尼亚大学的贡献。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Dec 6;19(24):5386. doi: 10.3390/s19245386.
6
Method for automatic adjustment of an insulin bolus calculator: in silico robustness evaluation under intra-day variability.胰岛素推注计算器自动调整方法:日内可变性下的计算机模拟稳健性评估。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2015 Apr;119(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
7
Effect of Automated Bolus Calculation on Glucose Variability and Quality of Life in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes on CSII Treatment.胰岛素泵强化治疗的 1 型糖尿病患者中自动推注计算对血糖变异性和生活质量的影响。
Clin Ther. 2018 Jun;40(6):862-871. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
8
Impact of telemedicine assessment on glycemic variability in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus.远程医疗评估对 1 型糖尿病患儿血糖变异性的影响。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Feb;15(2):136-42. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0243. Epub 2013 Jan 5.
9
The effect of glycemic variability on counterregulatory hormone responses to hypoglycemia in young children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.血糖变异性对 1 型糖尿病患儿和青少年低血糖时激素反调节的影响。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011 Nov;13(11):1085-9. doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0026. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
10
A novel analytical method for assessing glucose variability: using CGMS in type 1 diabetes mellitus.一种评估血糖变异性的新型分析方法:在1型糖尿病中使用动态血糖监测系统(CGMS)
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2006 Dec;8(6):644-53. doi: 10.1089/dia.2006.8.644.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of bolus advisors on glycaemic parameters in adults with diabetes on intensive insulin therapy: A systematic review with meta-analysis.在强化胰岛素治疗的糖尿病成人中,推注剂量顾问对血糖参数的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 May;26(5):1950-1961. doi: 10.1111/dom.15521. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
2
6. Glycemic Goals and Hypoglycemia: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.6. 血糖目标与低血糖:2024年糖尿病诊疗标准
Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(Suppl 1):S111-S125. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S006.
3
Challenges in Participant Engagement and Retention Using Mobile Health Apps: Literature Review.
使用移动健康应用程序在参与者参与度和留存率方面面临的挑战:文献综述
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 26;24(4):e35120. doi: 10.2196/35120.
4
Exercise management in type 1 diabetes: a consensus statement.1 型糖尿病的运动管理:共识声明。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 May;5(5):377-390. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30014-1. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
5
Are Risk Indices Derived From CGM Interchangeable With SMBG-Based Indices?基于连续血糖监测(CGM)得出的风险指数与基于自我血糖监测(SMBG)的指数可以互换吗?
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Aug 14;10(1):50-9. doi: 10.1177/1932296815599177.
6
Bolus calculators.推注计算器。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Sep;8(5):1035-41. doi: 10.1177/1932296814532906. Epub 2014 May 19.
7
The long and winding road to optimal HbA1c measurement.通往最佳 HbA1c 测量的漫长曲折之路。
Clin Chim Acta. 2013 Mar 15;418:63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.12.026. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
8
Glycaemic control in newly diagnosed diabetes patients and mortality from ischaemic heart disease: 20-year follow-up of the HUNT Study in Norway.新诊断糖尿病患者的血糖控制与缺血性心脏病死亡率:挪威HUNT研究的20年随访
Eur Heart J. 2009 Jun;30(11):1372-7. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp039. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
9
Assessment of risk for severe hypoglycemia among adults with IDDM: validation of the low blood glucose index.成年胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者严重低血糖风险评估:低血糖指数的验证
Diabetes Care. 1998 Nov;21(11):1870-5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.11.1870.
10
Transformations, means, and confidence intervals.变换、均值和置信区间。
BMJ. 1996 Apr 27;312(7038):1079. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7038.1079.