• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于植物身份验证的单类建模:综述

One-class modeling for verification of botanical identity: a review.

作者信息

Harnly James

机构信息

Methods and Applications Food Composition Lab, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, United States.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2025 Mar 27;16:1504230. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1504230. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2025.1504230
PMID:40213685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11983402/
Abstract

One-class modeling is a supervised multivariate botanical identification method based on principal component analysis (PCA) that constructs a model based only on the characteristics of the reference samples and uses the Q statistic as a combined metric. Test samples are judged to be similar (authentic) if their combined metric falls within the model limits or different (adulterated or contaminated) if the metric falls outside the model limits. This review initially considers three major factors affecting identification: the number of variables (univariate versus multivariate), the number of classes (one-class versus multi-class), and the type of analysis (quantitative versus qualitative). Multivariate analysis is commonly used for identification, providing a broader coverage of the identity specifications of the samples. With a combined metric, multivariate methods are analogous to univariate methods. One-class modeling and multi-class modeling employ different approaches for identification with one-class modeling being more flexible. While most methods to date have had a quantitative basis, qualitative methods are possible. This review focuses on multivariate, one-class modeling based on PCA. Examples are presented for the application of one-class modeling to identification of American ginseng (), , Black Cohosh (), and Maca (). These examples demonstrate the utility and flexibility of one-class modeling.

摘要

单类建模是一种基于主成分分析(PCA)的有监督多变量植物鉴定方法,该方法仅基于参考样本的特征构建模型,并使用Q统计量作为综合度量。如果测试样本的综合度量落在模型范围内,则判断其为相似(真实)样本;如果该度量超出模型范围,则判断其为不同(掺假或污染)样本。本综述首先考虑影响鉴定的三个主要因素:变量数量(单变量与多变量)、类别数量(单类与多类)以及分析类型(定量与定性)。多变量分析常用于鉴定,能更广泛地涵盖样本的身份特征。通过综合度量,多变量方法类似于单变量方法。单类建模和多类建模采用不同的鉴定方法,单类建模更灵活。虽然迄今为止大多数方法都有定量基础,但定性方法也是可行的。本综述重点关注基于PCA的多变量单类建模。文中给出了单类建模在西洋参、黑升麻和玛咖鉴定中的应用实例。这些实例展示了单类建模的实用性和灵活性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/cd5f0ecabc9e/fphar-16-1504230-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/36c8bfe6e22f/fphar-16-1504230-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/9ca8ce2f735d/fphar-16-1504230-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/7faded8cab2c/fphar-16-1504230-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/dbba950e6399/fphar-16-1504230-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/85fc8545d3f5/fphar-16-1504230-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/9b7fbb259f1b/fphar-16-1504230-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/ea612cfda26c/fphar-16-1504230-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/52d5e05145eb/fphar-16-1504230-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/e1cb5dcea02f/fphar-16-1504230-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/43984ed0d5e7/fphar-16-1504230-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/841da16299ca/fphar-16-1504230-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/626e3a26598c/fphar-16-1504230-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/6302def50823/fphar-16-1504230-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/cd5f0ecabc9e/fphar-16-1504230-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/36c8bfe6e22f/fphar-16-1504230-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/9ca8ce2f735d/fphar-16-1504230-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/7faded8cab2c/fphar-16-1504230-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/dbba950e6399/fphar-16-1504230-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/85fc8545d3f5/fphar-16-1504230-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/9b7fbb259f1b/fphar-16-1504230-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/ea612cfda26c/fphar-16-1504230-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/52d5e05145eb/fphar-16-1504230-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/e1cb5dcea02f/fphar-16-1504230-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/43984ed0d5e7/fphar-16-1504230-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/841da16299ca/fphar-16-1504230-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/626e3a26598c/fphar-16-1504230-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/6302def50823/fphar-16-1504230-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/11983402/cd5f0ecabc9e/fphar-16-1504230-g014.jpg

相似文献

1
One-class modeling for verification of botanical identity: a review.用于植物身份验证的单类建模:综述
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Mar 27;16:1504230. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1504230. eCollection 2025.
2
Botanical Authentication Using One-Class Modeling.基于单类建模的植物鉴别。
J AOAC Int. 2023 Jul 17;106(4):1077-1086. doi: 10.1093/jaoacint/qsad023.
3
Variation in Botanical Reference Materials: Similarity of Actaea Racemosa Analyzed by Flow Injection Mass Spectrometry.植物学参考材料的变化:流动注射质谱分析白头翁的相似性。
J AOAC Int. 2024 Mar 1;107(2):332-344. doi: 10.1093/jaoacint/qsad137.
4
Probability of identification: adulteration of American Ginseng with Asian Ginseng.鉴定概率:西洋参被亚洲人参掺杂的情况。
J AOAC Int. 2013 Nov-Dec;96(6):1258-65. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.13-290.
5
Economical, Plain, and Rapid Authentication of Actaea racemosa L. (syn. Cimicifuga racemosa, Black Cohosh) Herbal Raw Material by Resilient RP-PDA-HPLC and Chemometric Analysis.通过弹性RP-PDA-HPLC和化学计量学分析对总状升麻(同义词:黑升麻)草药原料进行经济、简便且快速的鉴定
Phytochem Anal. 2016 Nov;27(6):318-325. doi: 10.1002/pca.2622. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
6
Metabolic profiling of Actaea species extracts using high performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.采用高效液相色谱-电喷雾电离飞行时间质谱联用技术对白头翁属植物提取物进行代谢轮廓分析。
J Chromatogr A. 2011 Mar 18;1218(11):1461-76. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.01.033. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
7
Comparison of Flow Injection MS, NMR, and DNA Sequencing: Methods for Identification and Authentication of Black Cohosh (Actaea racemosa).流动注射质谱、核磁共振和DNA测序的比较:黑升麻(Actaea racemosa)的鉴定与认证方法
Planta Med. 2016 Feb;82(3):250-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1558113. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
8
Feruloyl dopamine-O-hexosides are efficient marker compounds as orthogonal validation for authentication of black cohosh (Actaea racemosa)-an UHPLC-HRAM-MS chemometrics study.阿魏酰多巴胺 -O-己糖苷是用于黑升麻(总状升麻)鉴定正交验证的有效标志物化合物——一项超高效液相色谱 - 高分辨质谱化学计量学研究
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017 Apr;409(10):2591-2600. doi: 10.1007/s00216-017-0205-1. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
9
Evaluating Sufficient Similarity of Botanical Dietary Supplements: Combining Chemical and In Vitro Biological Data.评估植物性膳食补充剂的充分相似性:结合化学和体外生物学数据。
Toxicol Sci. 2019 Dec 1;172(2):316-329. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfz189.
10
The Application of Vibrational Spectroscopy Techniques in the Qualitative Assessment of Material Traded as Ginseng.振动光谱技术在人参贸易材料定性评估中的应用。
Molecules. 2016 Apr 12;21(4):472. doi: 10.3390/molecules21040472.

本文引用的文献

1
Variation in Botanical Reference Materials: Similarity of Actaea Racemosa Analyzed by Flow Injection Mass Spectrometry.植物学参考材料的变化:流动注射质谱分析白头翁的相似性。
J AOAC Int. 2024 Mar 1;107(2):332-344. doi: 10.1093/jaoacint/qsad137.
2
Essential terminology and considerations for validation of non-targeted methods.非靶向方法验证的基本术语和注意事项。
Food Chem X. 2022 Dec 10;17:100538. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100538. eCollection 2023 Mar 30.
3
Botanical Authentication Using One-Class Modeling.基于单类建模的植物鉴别。
J AOAC Int. 2023 Jul 17;106(4):1077-1086. doi: 10.1093/jaoacint/qsad023.
4
Development of Non-Targeted Mass Spectrometry Method for Distinguishing Spelt and Wheat.用于区分斯佩尔特小麦和普通小麦的非靶向质谱法的开发
Foods. 2022 Dec 27;12(1):141. doi: 10.3390/foods12010141.
5
Characterization of Maca (Lepidium meyenii/Lepidium peruvianum) Using a Mass Spectral Fingerprinting, Metabolomic Analysis, and Genetic Sequencing Approach.利用质谱指纹图谱、代谢组学分析和遗传测序方法对玛咖(Lepidium meyenii/Lepidium peruvianum)进行表征。
Planta Med. 2020 Jul;86(10):674-685. doi: 10.1055/a-1161-0372. Epub 2020 May 20.
6
Comparison of Flow Injection MS, NMR, and DNA Sequencing: Methods for Identification and Authentication of Black Cohosh (Actaea racemosa).流动注射质谱、核磁共振和DNA测序的比较:黑升麻(Actaea racemosa)的鉴定与认证方法
Planta Med. 2016 Feb;82(3):250-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1558113. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
7
Characterization of near-infrared spectral variance in the authentication of skim and nonfat dry milk powder collection using ANOVA-PCA, pooled-ANOVA, and partial least-squares regression.使用方差分析-主成分分析(ANOVA-PCA)、合并方差分析和偏最小二乘回归对脱脂和全脂奶粉收集品鉴别中的近红外光谱方差进行表征。
J Agric Food Chem. 2014 Aug 13;62(32):8060-7. doi: 10.1021/jf5013727. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
8
Probability of identification: adulteration of American Ginseng with Asian Ginseng.鉴定概率:西洋参被亚洲人参掺杂的情况。
J AOAC Int. 2013 Nov-Dec;96(6):1258-65. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.13-290.
9
AOAC INTERNATIONAL guidelines for validation of botanical identification methods.美国官方分析化学家协会(AOAC INTERNATIONAL)植物鉴定方法验证指南。
J AOAC Int. 2012 Jan-Feb;95(1):268-72. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.11-447.