Wright Ben H, Jones Peter G W, Antrobus Mark R, Baross Anthony W
School of Sport, Nutrition and Allied Health Professions, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1007/s00421-025-05785-3.
Short- to long-term isometric resistance training (IRT) can produce clinically meaningful reductions in resting blood pressure, but established methods are costly or require laboratory access. An affordable method could improve accessibility; however, there is a need to establish efficacy and safety prior to prescription as an alternative IRT method. This study aims to determine whether a novel isometric training band (ITB) can elicit cardiovascular (CV) responses (blood pressure [BP] and heart rate [HR]) comparable with those of established methods.
Fifteen normotensive adults (systolic [sBP]; 120 ± 3 mmHg, diastolic [dBP]; 71 ± 6 mmHg) completed a single 2-min isometric handgrip contraction (IHG) at 30% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) followed by 2-min contractions for four individual ITB exercises at a self-determined intensity to replicate perceived exertion (CR-10) during IHG. A further 15 normotensive participants (sBP; 118 ± 6 mmHg, dBP; 68 ± 7 mmHg) completed bouts of IRT (IHG, 4 × 2 min at 30% MVC; ITB, 4 × 2 min at imposed CR-10 values [4-5]), with CV responses compared between bouts.
No differences in BP responses were detected between IHG and each ITB exercise (P > 0.05). CR-10 values and HRs were comparable between the individual IHG contraction and three ITB exercises (P > 0.05). Between bouts, regulating contraction intensity through imposed CR-10 values resulted in comparable BP responses (P > 0.05).
These findings suggest that a novel ITB and associated protocol may serve as versatile, inclusive, and accessible alternative method for performing IRT.
短期至长期的等长抗阻训练(IRT)可使静息血压产生具有临床意义的降低,但现有方法成本高昂或需要使用实验室设备。一种经济实惠的方法可以提高其可及性;然而,在将其作为一种替代性IRT方法开出处方之前,有必要确定其有效性和安全性。本研究旨在确定一种新型等长训练带(ITB)能否引发与现有方法相当的心血管(CV)反应(血压[BP]和心率[HR])。
15名血压正常的成年人(收缩压[sBP];120±3 mmHg,舒张压[dBP];71±6 mmHg)以最大自主收缩(MVC)的30%完成一次2分钟的等长握力收缩(IHG),随后以自我确定的强度进行4项单独的ITB练习,每次2分钟收缩,以复制IHG期间的主观用力程度(CR-10)。另外15名血压正常的参与者(sBP;118±6 mmHg,dBP;68±7 mmHg)完成了IRT训练(IHG,4×2分钟,强度为MVC的30%;ITB,4×2分钟,强度为设定的CR-10值[4-5]),并比较了各训练回合之间的CV反应。
未检测到IHG与每项ITB练习之间的血压反应存在差异(P>0.05)。个体IHG收缩与三项ITB练习之间的CR-10值和心率相当(P>0.05)。在各训练回合之间,通过设定CR-10值来调节收缩强度可导致相当的血压反应(P>0.05)。
这些发现表明,一种新型ITB及相关方案可能是进行IRT的通用、包容且可及的替代方法。