Winchester David J, Singh Lavisha, Edge Stephen B, Allison Kimberly H, Barlow William E, Bossuyt Veerle, Chavez-MacGregor Mariana, Conant Emily F, Connolly James L, De Los Santos Jennifer F, Hayes Daniel F, Hylton Nola M, Mittendorf Elizabeth A, Plichta Jennifer K, Provenzano Elena, Salerno Kilian E, Sharma Priyanka, Symmans W Fraser, Weaver Donald, Hortobagyi Gabriel N
City of Hope Chicago, Zion, IL.
Northshore University Healthcare, Evanston, IL.
J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jun 10;43(17):1948-1960. doi: 10.1200/JCO-24-01739. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
Prognostic staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is not included in American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging. This study addressed this deficiency by including responses to therapy with standardized staging variables in a validated prognostic staging system for patients treated with NACT.
The National Cancer Database was queried to identify 140,605 patients treated with NACT between 2010 and 2018. Three response categories (no response, partial response, and complete response [pCR]) were created on the basis of comparison of clinical and post-NACT pathologic staging. Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinical stage, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and grade were analyzed for each category. Predictive models for each response category were validated using the bootstrap technique. Calibration plots compared predicted and observed 3-year survival probabilities in the training and validation data sets.
Each validated model demonstrated statistically significant survival differences in the postneoadjuvant prognostic stage assignment. Of all patients with a pCR, 94.2% were assigned to postneoadjuvant ypStage I compared with 35.5% of patients with no response. Advancing clinical stage had a progressive but small impact on overall survival (OS) with pCR (high-grade, triple-negative breast cancer [TNBC]: cStage I, 97% cStage IIIB/IIIC, 91%; grade 2 luminal A: 97% 91%) but was associated with a profound decrease in OS with no response for TNBC or HER2+ disease (high-grade TNBC 89% 50%) and less profound for grade 2 luminal A disease with no response (97% 81%).
We present a novel, validated prognostic staging system that predicts OS according to the response to NACT. These data will provide AJCC stage assignments for a growing proportion of patients treated with NACT.
美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期未纳入新辅助化疗(NACT)后的预后分期。本研究通过在一个经过验证的NACT治疗患者预后分期系统中纳入标准化分期变量的治疗反应,解决了这一缺陷。
查询国家癌症数据库,以识别2010年至2018年间接受NACT治疗的140605例患者。根据临床分期与NACT后病理分期的比较,创建了三个反应类别(无反应、部分反应和完全缓解[pCR])。对每个类别分析临床分期、雌激素受体、孕激素受体、人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)和分级的单因素和多因素分析。使用自助法技术验证每个反应类别的预测模型。校准图比较了训练和验证数据集中预测和观察到的3年生存概率。
每个经过验证的模型在新辅助后预后分期分配中显示出统计学上显著的生存差异。在所有达到pCR的患者中,94.2%被分配到新辅助后ypStage I,而无反应的患者为35.5%。临床分期进展对pCR患者的总生存期(OS)有渐进但较小的影响(高级别、三阴性乳腺癌[TNBC]:cStage I,97%;cStage IIIB/IIIC,91%;2级管腔A型:97% 91%),但与TNBC或HER2+疾病无反应患者的OS显著降低相关(高级别TNBC 89% 50%),而2级管腔A型疾病无反应患者的影响较小(97% 81%)。
我们提出了一种新的、经过验证的预后分期系统,该系统根据对NACT的反应预测OS。这些数据将为越来越多接受NACT治疗的患者提供AJCC分期。