Shen Steven, Josic Kristin, Pak Jeong W, Meuer Stacy M, Melia Michele, Domalpally Amitha, Sun Jennifer K, Blodi Barbara
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Wisconsin Reading Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin.
Jaeb Centre for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Ophthalmol Retina. 2025 Oct;9(10):964-971. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2025.03.027. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
To evaluate the long-term effects of ranibizumab compared with panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) on retinal vasculature in eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).
Post hoc analysis of DRCR Retina Network Protocol S randomized clinical trial.
Adults with type 1 or 2 diabetes and PDR in at least 1 eye.
Integrative Vessel Analysis software was used to measure central retinal arteriolar equivalent (CRAE) and central retinal venular equivalent (CRVE) of vessels at 1 disc diameter from the optic nerve edge on fundus photographs at baseline, 2 and 5 years for study eyes randomized to ranibizumab or PRP treatment for PDR. Changes in CRAE and CRVE were analyzed using mixed linear regression models with multivariable adjustments.
Mean change in CRAE and CRVE from baseline to 2 and 5 years.
Data from 107 eyes (90 participants) in the ranibizumab (n = 48) and PRP group (n = 59) were analyzed. For the ranibizumab versus PRP groups, CRAE decreased by a mean of 2 versus 12 μm at 2 years (mean difference, 10 μm; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4-16; P = 0.003); and 9 versus 13 μm at 5 years (mean difference, 4 μm; 95% CI, -2 to 10; P = 0.22). Central retinal venular equivalent decreased by 14 versus 19 μm at 2 years (mean difference, 4 μm; 95% CI, -3 to 11; P = 0.26) and 18 versus 28 μm at 5 years (mean difference, 11 μm; 95% CI, 3-19; P = 0.01).
In patients with PDR, CRAE and CRVE decreased in both the ranibizumab and PRP groups at 5 years, but the rates of change before and after 2 years may be different. In this subset of eyes from Protocol S, the greater reduction in CRAE in the PRP group was statistically significant at 2 years but not at 5 years. For CRVE, the PRP group decreased more than the ranibizumab group, but the difference was statistically significant at 5 but not 2 years. Future research may investigate the underlying causes for retinal arteriolar and venular narrowing after treatment for PDR, and the possibility of an anatomic correlation with visual field loss.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
评估雷珠单抗与全视网膜光凝术(PRP)相比,对增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)患者视网膜血管的长期影响。
DRCR视网膜网络方案S随机临床试验的事后分析。
至少一只眼睛患有1型或2型糖尿病及PDR的成年人。
使用综合血管分析软件,在基线、2年和5年时,对随机接受雷珠单抗或PRP治疗PDR的研究眼的眼底照片上,距视神经边缘1个视盘直径处的血管测量视网膜中央动脉等效直径(CRAE)和视网膜中央静脉等效直径(CRVE)。使用多变量调整的混合线性回归模型分析CRAE和CRVE的变化。
从基线到2年和5年CRAE和CRVE的平均变化。
分析了雷珠单抗组(n = 48)和PRP组(n = 59)中107只眼(90名参与者)的数据。雷珠单抗组与PRP组相比,2年时CRAE平均下降2μm,而PRP组下降12μm(平均差值为10μm;95%置信区间[CI],4 - 16;P = 0.003);5年时分别下降9μm和13μm(平均差值为4μm;95%CI,-2至10;P = 0.22)。视网膜中央静脉等效直径在2年时分别下降14μm和19μm(平均差值为4μm;95%CI,-3至11;P = 0.26),5年时分别下降18μm和28μm(平均差值为11μm;95%CI,3 - 19;P = 0.01)。
在PDR患者中,雷珠单抗组和PRP组在5年时CRAE和CRVE均下降,但2年前后的变化率可能不同。在方案S的这部分眼中,PRP组在2年时CRAE的更大降幅具有统计学意义,但5年时无统计学意义。对于CRVE,PRP组下降幅度大于雷珠单抗组,但差异在5年时有统计学意义,2年时无统计学意义。未来研究可探讨PDR治疗后视网膜动静脉狭窄的潜在原因,以及与视野缺损的解剖学相关性。
本文末尾的脚注和披露中可能会有专有或商业披露内容。