Suppr超能文献

生物电阻抗分析在预测淋巴水肿二次手术干预中的作用

The Role of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Predicting Secondary Surgical Interventions for Lymphedema.

作者信息

Otsuka Wataru, Yoshida Shuhei, Taketomi Nanami, Orihashi Yasushi, Koshima Isao

机构信息

Plastic Surgery & International Center for Lymphedema (ICL), Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan.

Clinical Research Center in Hiroshima, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 21;14(7):2151. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072151.

Abstract

: Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), known for its utility in monitoring fluid balance and lymphedema progression, is non-invasive and practical. However, circumferential tape measurements remain the gold standard for assessing limb volume changes, despite operator variability. This study investigated whether BIA could reliably assess the need for secondary surgical interventions in lymphedema patients. : We retrospectively analyzed lower extremity lymphedema patients who underwent multiple lymphaticovenous anastomoses on both legs from April 2017 to June 2023. This study involved 14 patients with a single surgery and 34 requiring additional surgeries. Logistic regression evaluated associations between the number of surgeries and valuables, including extracellular water-to-total body water (ECW/TBW) ratios measured via BIA, the sum of five-part circumferential values via tape measuring, age, and body mass index. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis calculated the area under the curve (AUC) for ECW/TBW and circumference values, analyzed separately for left and right legs. : ECW/TBW values were significantly associated with the need for a second surgery for both the right leg ( = 0.02, ROC-AUC = 0.86) and the left leg ( = 0.04, ROC-AUC = 0.86). In contrast, circumference measurements were not significant predictors for either the right leg ( = 0.46, ROC-AUC = 0.77) or the left leg ( = 0.60, ROC-AUC = 0.78). ECW/TBW demonstrated a higher AUC compared to circumference measurements, indicating its potential as a more sensitive tool for predicting the need for additional surgical interventions. : BIA may serve as a valuable tool for monitoring treatment outcomes and guiding secondary surgical planning. Larger studies are needed to validate its clinical utility.

摘要

生物电阻抗分析(BIA)以其在监测液体平衡和淋巴水肿进展方面的实用性而闻名,它具有非侵入性且实用的特点。然而,尽管存在操作者差异,但周径卷尺测量仍是评估肢体体积变化的金标准。本研究调查了BIA是否能可靠地评估淋巴水肿患者二次手术干预的必要性。

我们回顾性分析了2017年4月至2023年6月期间在双腿接受多次淋巴管静脉吻合术的下肢淋巴水肿患者。本研究纳入了14例接受单次手术的患者和34例需要额外手术的患者。逻辑回归评估了手术次数与相关指标之间的关联,这些指标包括通过BIA测量的细胞外液与总体液(ECW/TBW)比值、卷尺测量的五部位周径值总和、年龄和体重指数。受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析分别计算了左腿和右腿的ECW/TBW和周径值的曲线下面积(AUC)。

右腿(P = 0.02, ROC - AUC = 0.86)和左腿(P = 0.04, ROC - AUC = 0.86)的ECW/TBW值与二次手术的必要性显著相关。相比之下,周径测量对于右腿(P = 0.46, ROC - AUC = 0.77)或左腿(P = 0.60, ROC - AUC = 0.78)都不是显著的预测指标。与周径测量相比,ECW/TBW显示出更高的AUC,表明其作为预测额外手术干预必要性的更敏感工具的潜力。

BIA可能是监测治疗结果和指导二次手术规划的有价值工具。需要更大规模的研究来验证其临床实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b27/11989653/de46e4f27922/jcm-14-02151-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验