Alnahdi Ali H, Aldaihan Mishal M, Alsubiheen Abdulrahman M
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 10219, Riyadh 11433, Saudi Arabia.
King Salman Center for Disability Research, Riyadh 11614, Saudi Arabia.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 2;13(7):800. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13070800.
Inconsistencies exist regarding the exact multidimensional structure underlying the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), with no prior study examining the internal structure of the Arabic FABQ. This study aimed to examine validity evidence of the Arabic FABQ in patients with low back pain (LBP), based on two sources: validity evidence based on the internal structure (dimensionality and reliability) and validity evidence based on relations with other variables (i.e., pain intensity and disability). Participants (N = 112) with LBP were recruited from physical therapy clinics. Data were collected through the completion of FABQ and other measures of pain and disability. CFA was performed using a diagonally weighted least squares estimation. The fit of the two-factor model recommended by the original scale developer was assessed using multiple fit indices. Reliability of FABQ subscale scores was assessed using McDonald's omega (ω) and Average Variance Extracted (AVE). One hundred and twelve patients with LBP with mostly chronic complaints participated in the study. The CFA supported the two-factor model with modifications to account for residual correlations between items 4-5 and 6-7, yielding improved fit indices (χ(41) = 77.82; < 0.001; TLI = 0.98, CFI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.09 (90% CI = 0.06-0.12), and SRMR = 0.08). All factor loadings were salient and significant with values ranging from 0.43 to 0.96. The two underlying factors reflecting physical activity-related and work-related fear avoidance beliefs showed a significant positive correlation of 0.58. These findings confirm the hypothesized dimensionality of the Arabic FABQ. The FABQ work subscale scores demonstrated higher reliability (ω = 0.86; AVE = 0.54) compared to the physical activity subscale scores (ω = 0.63; AVE = 0.44), with both factors measuring related but distinct constructs. The latent scores for the FABQ related to physical activity demonstrated stronger positive correlations with pain intensity (r = 0.37; < 0.001) and disability (r = 0.43; < 0.001), compared to the latent scores for work-related FABQ, which showed weaker correlations with pain intensity (r = 0.22; < 0.001) and disability (r = 0.26; < 0.001). This study provides evidence to support the two-factor structure of the Arabic FABQ and the common scoring method for the FABQ and facilitates the interpretation of the FABQ subscale scores as reflecting related but distinct domains of fear avoidance beliefs.
关于恐惧回避信念问卷(FABQ)背后确切的多维结构存在不一致之处,此前尚无研究考察阿拉伯语版FABQ的内部结构。本研究旨在基于两个来源检验阿拉伯语版FABQ在腰痛(LBP)患者中的效度证据:基于内部结构的效度证据(维度性和信度)以及基于与其他变量(即疼痛强度和残疾)关系的效度证据。从物理治疗诊所招募了112名LBP患者。通过完成FABQ以及其他疼痛和残疾测量指标来收集数据。使用对角加权最小二乘法估计进行验证性因子分析(CFA)。使用多个拟合指数评估原始量表开发者推荐的双因素模型的拟合度。使用麦克唐纳ω系数(ω)和平均提取方差(AVE)评估FABQ子量表分数的信度。112名主要有慢性主诉的LBP患者参与了本研究。CFA支持双因素模型,并对项目4 - 5和6 - 7之间的残差相关性进行调整,从而得到改进的拟合指数(χ(41) = 77.82;< 0.001;TLI = 0.98,CFI = 0.99;RMSEA = 0.09(90%CI = 0.06 - 0.12),SRMR = 0.08)。所有因子载荷均显著且突出,值范围为0.43至0.96。反映与身体活动相关和与工作相关的恐惧回避信念的两个潜在因子显示出显著的正相关,相关系数为0.58。这些发现证实了阿拉伯语版FABQ的假设维度性。与身体活动子量表分数(ω = 0.63;AVE = 0.44)相比,FABQ工作子量表分数显示出更高的信度(ω = 0.86;AVE = 0.54),两个因子测量的是相关但不同的结构。与工作相关的FABQ潜在分数相比,与身体活动相关的FABQ潜在分数与疼痛强度(r = 0.37;< 0.001)和残疾(r = 0.43;< 0.001)的正相关性更强,而与工作相关的FABQ潜在分数与疼痛强度(r = 0.