Riddick Stuart N, Riddick John C, Kiplimo Elijah, Rainwater Bryan, Mbua Mercy, Cheptonui Fancy, Laughery Kate, Levin Ezra, Zimmerle Daniel J
Department of Science, Engineering and Aviation, University of the Highlands and Islands Perth, Crieff Road, Perth PH1 2NX, UK.
Methane Emission Technology Evaluation Center (METEC), Energy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA.
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Mar 21;25(7):1954. doi: 10.3390/s25071954.
The quantification of methane concentrations in air is essential for the quantification of methane emissions, which in turn is necessary to determine absolute emissions and the efficacy of emission mitigation strategies. These are essential if countries are to meet climate goals. Large-scale deployment of methane analyzers across millions of emission sites is prohibitively expensive, and lower-cost instrumentation has been recently developed as an alternative. Currently, it is unclear how cheaper instrumentation will affect measurement resolution or accuracy. To test this, the Wireless Autonomous Transportable Methane Emission Reporting System (WATCHERS) has been developed, comprising four commercially available sensing technologies: metal oxide (MOx,), Non-dispersion Infrared (NDIR), integrated infrared (INIR), and tunable diode laser absorption spectrometer (TDLAS). WATCHERS is the accumulated knowledge of several long-term methane measurement projects at Colorado State University's Methane Emission Technology Evaluation Center (METEC), and this study describes the integration of these sensors into a single unit and reports initial instrument response to calibration procedures and controlled release experiments. Specifically, this paper aims to describe the development of the WATCHERS unit, report initial sensor responses, and describe future research goals. Meanwhile, future work will use data gathered by multiple WATCHERS units to 1. better understand the cost-benefit balance of methane sensors, and 2. identify how decreasing instrumentation costs could increase deployment coverage and therefore inform large-scale methane monitoring strategies. Both calibration and response experiments indicate the INIR has little practical use for measuring methane concentrations less than 500 ppm. The MOx sensor is shown to have a logarithmic response to methane concentration change between background and 600 ppm but it is strongly suggested that passively sampling MOx sensors cannot respond fast enough to report concentrations that change in a sub-minute time frame. The NDIR sensor reported a linear change to methane concentration between background and 600 ppm, although there was a noticeable lag in reporting changing concentration, especially at higher values, and individual peaks could be observed throughout the experiment even when the plumes were released 5 s apart. The TDLAS sensor reported all changes in concentration but remains prohibitively expensive. Our findings suggest that each sensor technology could be optimized by either operational design or deployment location to quantify methane emissions. The WATCHERS units will be deployed in real-world environments to investigate the utility of each in the future.
空气中甲烷浓度的量化对于甲烷排放的量化至关重要,而甲烷排放的量化对于确定绝对排放量和减排策略的有效性又是必要的。如果各国要实现气候目标,这些都是必不可少的。在数百万个排放点大规模部署甲烷分析仪成本过高,因此最近开发了成本较低的仪器作为替代方案。目前,尚不清楚成本较低的仪器将如何影响测量分辨率或准确性。为了对此进行测试,开发了无线自主便携式甲烷排放报告系统(WATCHERS),它包括四种市售传感技术:金属氧化物(MOx)、非分散红外(NDIR)、集成红外(INIR)和可调谐二极管激光吸收光谱仪(TDLAS)。WATCHERS是科罗拉多州立大学甲烷排放技术评估中心(METEC)多个长期甲烷测量项目积累的知识,本研究描述了将这些传感器集成到一个单元中,并报告了仪器对校准程序和控制释放实验的初始响应。具体而言,本文旨在描述WATCHERS单元的开发,报告传感器的初始响应,并描述未来的研究目标。同时,未来的工作将使用多个WATCHERS单元收集的数据来:1. 更好地理解甲烷传感器的成本效益平衡;2. 确定降低仪器成本如何能够增加部署覆盖范围,从而为大规模甲烷监测策略提供信息。校准和响应实验均表明,INIR对于测量低于500 ppm的甲烷浓度几乎没有实际用途。MOx传感器对背景浓度与600 ppm之间的甲烷浓度变化呈对数响应,但强烈建议被动采样的MOx传感器对亚分钟时间框架内变化的浓度响应不够快,无法报告浓度。NDIR传感器报告了背景浓度与600 ppm之间甲烷浓度的线性变化,尽管在报告浓度变化时有明显滞后,尤其是在较高值时,并且即使羽流每隔5秒释放一次,在整个实验过程中仍可观察到个别峰值。TDLAS传感器报告了所有浓度变化,但成本仍然过高。我们的研究结果表明,每种传感器技术都可以通过操作设计或部署位置进行优化,以量化甲烷排放。未来将在实际环境中部署WATCHERS单元,以研究每种技术的实用性。