Fan Bingfei, Zhang Luobin, Cai Shibo, Du Mingyu, Liu Tao, Li Qingguo, Shull Peter
College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China.
Key Laboratory of Special Purpose Equipment and Advanced Processing Technology, Ministry of Education and Zhejiang Province, College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China.
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Mar 22;25(7):1976. doi: 10.3390/s25071976.
Wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) have been widely used in human movement analysis outside the laboratory. However, the IMU-based orientation estimation remains challenging, particularly in scenarios involving relatively fast movements. Increased sampling rate has the potential to improve accuracy, but it also increases power consumption and computational complexity. The relationship between sampling frequencies and accuracies remains unclear. We thus investigated the specific influence of IMU sampling frequency on orientation estimation across a spectrum of movement speeds and recommended sufficient sampling rates. Seventeen healthy subjects wore IMUs on their thigh, shank, and foot and performed walking (1.2 m/s) and running (2.2 m/s) trials on a treadmill, and a motion testbed with an IMU was used to mimic high-frequency cyclic human movements up to 3.0 Hz. Four widely used IMU sensor fusion algorithms computed orientations at 10, 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, 800, and 1600 Hz and were compared with marker-based optical motion capture (OMC) orientations to determine accuracy. Results suggest that the sufficient IMU sampling rate for walking is 100 Hz, running is 200 Hz, and high-speed cyclic movements is 400 Hz. The accelerometer sampling rate is less important than the gyroscope sampling rate. Further, accelerometer sampling rates exceeding 100 Hz even resulted in decreased accuracy because excessive orientation updates using distorted accelerations and angular velocity introduced more error than merely using angular velocity. These findings could serve as a foundation to inform wearable IMU development or selection across a spectrum of human gait movement speeds.
可穿戴惯性测量单元(IMU)已在实验室外的人体运动分析中得到广泛应用。然而,基于IMU的方向估计仍然具有挑战性,特别是在涉及相对快速运动的场景中。提高采样率有可能提高准确性,但也会增加功耗和计算复杂度。采样频率与准确性之间的关系仍不明确。因此,我们研究了IMU采样频率对不同运动速度下方向估计的具体影响,并推荐了足够的采样率。17名健康受试者在大腿、小腿和足部佩戴IMU,在跑步机上进行步行(1.2米/秒)和跑步(2.2米/秒)试验,并使用带有IMU的运动测试台模拟高达3.0赫兹的高频周期性人体运动。四种广泛使用的IMU传感器融合算法在10、25、50、100、200、400、800和1600赫兹下计算方向,并与基于标记的光学运动捕捉(OMC)方向进行比较以确定准确性。结果表明,步行的足够IMU采样率为100赫兹,跑步为200赫兹,高速周期性运动为400赫兹。加速度计采样率不如陀螺仪采样率重要。此外,加速度计采样率超过100赫兹甚至会导致准确性下降,因为使用失真的加速度和角速度进行过多的方向更新引入的误差比仅使用角速度更多。这些发现可为不同人类步态运动速度下的可穿戴IMU开发或选择提供依据。