• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择性激光小梁成形术(SLT)360°与180°治疗开角型青光眼(OAG)和高眼压症(OHT)的比较:一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析

A Comparison of the 360° Versus 180° of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) in the Treatment of Open Angle Glaucoma (OAG) and Ocular Hypertension (OHT): A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Amaral Dillan Cunha, Guedes Jaime, Moreira Pedro Henrique Santana, Pereira Sacha, de Oliveira Lucas Neves, Pimentel Ana Luiza Machado Ribeiro, Caneca Karina de Oliveira, Monteiro Mário Luiz Ribeiro, Louzada Ricardo Noguera

机构信息

Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Glaucoma Research Center, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Curr Eye Res. 2025 Aug;50(8):828-838. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2025.2485223. Epub 2025 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1080/02713683.2025.2485223
PMID:40219934
Abstract

PURPOSE

There are several divergences in the literature regarding the safety and effectiveness of selective laser trabeculoplasty application at 360° vs. 180°. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of selective laser trabeculoplasty at 180° and 360° in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis, registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024501311), conducted searches in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to January 2024. The protocol is registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews under the same registration number. Primary outcomes included mean intraocular pressure change at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months, success ratio, and adverse events. Statistical analysis utilized R version 4.3.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included nine studies, involving 1065 eyes. Compared to 180° selective laser trabeculoplasty, 360° selective laser trabeculoplasty demonstrated superior success ratios (odds ratio 1.63;  = .002) and intraocular pressure reduction at 1 (mean difference -0.99;  < .01), 6 (mean difference -1.37;  < .01), and 12 (mean difference -1.41;  < .01) months. Although the intraocular pressure difference at 24 months was not statistically significant, a subgroup analysis showed that one study influenced heterogeneity and effect size. Adverse event rates did not significantly differ between the groups.

CONCLUSION

360° selective laser trabeculoplasty is preferred for initial laser therapy in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. It achieves maximal intraocular pressure reduction while maintaining an excellent safety profile.

摘要

目的

关于360°与180°选择性激光小梁成形术的安全性和有效性,文献中存在几种分歧。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在比较180°和360°选择性激光小梁成形术在开角型青光眼和高眼压症中的疗效和安全性。

方法

本系统评价和荟萃分析在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(注册号CRD42024501311)注册,从数据库建立至2024年1月在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆进行检索。该方案以相同注册号在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库注册。主要结局包括1、6、12和24个月时的平均眼压变化、成功率和不良事件。统计分析使用R 4.3.2版本(奥地利维也纳的R统计计算基金会)。

结果

荟萃分析纳入9项研究,涉及1065只眼。与180°选择性激光小梁成形术相比,360°选择性激光小梁成形术显示出更高的成功率(优势比1.63;P = 0.002),以及在1个月(平均差值-0.99;P < 0.01)、6个月(平均差值-1.37;P < 0.01)和12个月(平均差值-1.41;P < 0.01)时眼压降低更明显。虽然24个月时眼压差异无统计学意义,但亚组分析显示一项研究影响了异质性和效应量。两组间不良事件发生率无显著差异。

结论

对于开角型青光眼和高眼压症的初始激光治疗,360°选择性激光小梁成形术更为可取。它能在保持良好安全性的同时最大程度降低眼压。

相似文献

1
A Comparison of the 360° Versus 180° of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) in the Treatment of Open Angle Glaucoma (OAG) and Ocular Hypertension (OHT): A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.选择性激光小梁成形术(SLT)360°与180°治疗开角型青光眼(OAG)和高眼压症(OHT)的比较:一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析
Curr Eye Res. 2025 Aug;50(8):828-838. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2025.2485223. Epub 2025 Apr 12.
2
Laser trabeculoplasty for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.激光小梁成形术治疗开角型青光眼和高眼压症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 9;8(8):CD003919. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003919.pub3.
3
Perioperative medications for preventing temporarily increased intraocular pressure after laser trabeculoplasty.用于预防激光小梁成形术后眼压暂时升高的围手术期药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 23;2(2):CD010746. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010746.pub2.
4
Safety and efficacy of laser trabeculoplasty compared to drug therapy for the management of open-angle glaucoma: systematic review and meta-analysis study.与药物治疗相比,激光小梁成形术治疗开角型青光眼的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析研究
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar;263(3):625-635. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06624-5. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
5
Laser trabeculoplasty for open angle glaucoma.激光小梁成形术治疗开角型青光眼。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD003919. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003919.pub2.
6
Intraocular pressure reduction in patients treated with micropulse laser trabeculoplasty vs selective laser trabeculoplasty.接受微脉冲激光小梁成形术与选择性激光小梁成形术治疗的患者的眼压降低情况。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 1;73(Suppl 3):S460-S465. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_400_24. Epub 2025 May 30.
7
Peripheral iridotomy for pigmentary glaucoma.色素性青光眼的周边虹膜切开术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 12;2(2):CD005655. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005655.pub2.
8
Phase 3, Randomized, Comparison Study of Intracameral Bimatoprost Implant 10 µg and Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty.3期随机比较研究:前房内注射10μg比马前列素植入物与选择性激光小梁成形术
Am J Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr;272:19-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.12.026. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
9
Real-world outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty and medical treatment in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.选择性激光小梁成形术与药物治疗原发性开角型青光眼和高眼压症的真实世界转归
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 20;10(1):e002151. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002151.
10
Fornix-based versus limbal-based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma.基于穹窿部的与基于角巩膜缘的结膜小梁切除术瓣治疗青光眼。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 26;8(8):CD009380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009380.pub3.