Amaral Dillan Cunha, Guedes Jaime, Moreira Pedro Henrique Santana, Pereira Sacha, de Oliveira Lucas Neves, Pimentel Ana Luiza Machado Ribeiro, Caneca Karina de Oliveira, Monteiro Mário Luiz Ribeiro, Louzada Ricardo Noguera
Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Glaucoma Research Center, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Curr Eye Res. 2025 Aug;50(8):828-838. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2025.2485223. Epub 2025 Apr 12.
There are several divergences in the literature regarding the safety and effectiveness of selective laser trabeculoplasty application at 360° vs. 180°. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of selective laser trabeculoplasty at 180° and 360° in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
This systematic review and meta-analysis, registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024501311), conducted searches in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to January 2024. The protocol is registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews under the same registration number. Primary outcomes included mean intraocular pressure change at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months, success ratio, and adverse events. Statistical analysis utilized R version 4.3.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
The meta-analysis included nine studies, involving 1065 eyes. Compared to 180° selective laser trabeculoplasty, 360° selective laser trabeculoplasty demonstrated superior success ratios (odds ratio 1.63; = .002) and intraocular pressure reduction at 1 (mean difference -0.99; < .01), 6 (mean difference -1.37; < .01), and 12 (mean difference -1.41; < .01) months. Although the intraocular pressure difference at 24 months was not statistically significant, a subgroup analysis showed that one study influenced heterogeneity and effect size. Adverse event rates did not significantly differ between the groups.
360° selective laser trabeculoplasty is preferred for initial laser therapy in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. It achieves maximal intraocular pressure reduction while maintaining an excellent safety profile.
关于360°与180°选择性激光小梁成形术的安全性和有效性,文献中存在几种分歧。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在比较180°和360°选择性激光小梁成形术在开角型青光眼和高眼压症中的疗效和安全性。
本系统评价和荟萃分析在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(注册号CRD42024501311)注册,从数据库建立至2024年1月在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆进行检索。该方案以相同注册号在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库注册。主要结局包括1、6、12和24个月时的平均眼压变化、成功率和不良事件。统计分析使用R 4.3.2版本(奥地利维也纳的R统计计算基金会)。
荟萃分析纳入9项研究,涉及1065只眼。与180°选择性激光小梁成形术相比,360°选择性激光小梁成形术显示出更高的成功率(优势比1.63;P = 0.002),以及在1个月(平均差值-0.99;P < 0.01)、6个月(平均差值-1.37;P < 0.01)和12个月(平均差值-1.41;P < 0.01)时眼压降低更明显。虽然24个月时眼压差异无统计学意义,但亚组分析显示一项研究影响了异质性和效应量。两组间不良事件发生率无显著差异。
对于开角型青光眼和高眼压症的初始激光治疗,360°选择性激光小梁成形术更为可取。它能在保持良好安全性的同时最大程度降低眼压。