Suppr超能文献

中国广州长期护理保险制度中居家残疾受益人的补偿偏好

Compensation preferences of home-based disabled beneficiaries in the long-term care insurance system in Guangzhou, China.

作者信息

Qian Yi, Tuersun Yusupujiang, Li Duqiao, Luo Lan, Kou Yingdan, Yuan Wenhao, Li Lehuan, Zheng Liancheng, Wu Mengping, Wang Wenyu, Chen Jiangyun

机构信息

School of Health Management, Southern Medical University, No.1023-1063 Shatai Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province 510515, China.

Hongshan Street Community Health Service Center, Huangpu District, No. 601, Guangxin Road, Huangpu District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province 518055, China.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2025 May 9;40(5):556-565. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaf015.

Abstract

This study explores the preferences and willingness-to-pay of home-based disabled elderly individuals for long-term care insurance (LTCI) compensation mechanisms in Guangzhou, China, using a discrete choice experiment. The research aims to identify preferred compensation strategies, analyze heterogeneity in preferences, and provide recommendations for policy optimization. Using purposive and cluster sampling, 156 eligible participants were identified, with 96 completing the survey (response rate: 61.5.%). Disabled elderly individuals were defined based on activities of daily living assessments. A conditional Logit model was applied to analyze preferences, and subgroup analyses examined differences by education, gender, activities of daily living status, and caregiving arrangements. Key findings include preferences for medical care over life care, family caregivers over professional ones, and cash subsidies over mixed or proportional reimbursement. Respondents were willing to pay an additional $21.60 for medical care and $25.26 for cash subsidies (1 USD = 7.3 CNY). The average out-of-pocket cost for LTCI services was $27.39 per session, with a sub-average cost of $16.44 for basic care services. Subgroup analyses revealed higher-educated individuals favored medical care, while lower-educated groups prioritized affordability. Severely disabled individuals preferred professional caregivers, such as registered nurses. This study highlights the need to expand medical care services, integrate flexible compensation models, and tailor policies to demographic differences. The findings provide evidence for optimizing China's LTCI system and offer insights for aging populations in low- and middle-income countries.

摘要

本研究采用离散选择实验,探讨了中国广州居家残疾老年人对长期护理保险(LTCI)补偿机制的偏好和支付意愿。该研究旨在确定首选的补偿策略,分析偏好的异质性,并为政策优化提供建议。通过立意抽样和整群抽样,确定了156名符合条件的参与者,其中96人完成了调查(回复率:61.5%)。根据日常生活活动评估来定义残疾老年人。应用条件Logit模型分析偏好,并通过亚组分析考察教育程度、性别、日常生活活动状况和照护安排的差异。主要研究结果包括:相比于生活照护,更偏好医疗照护;相比于专业照护者,更倾向于家庭照护者;相比于混合或比例报销,更青睐现金补贴。受访者愿意为医疗照护额外支付21.60美元,为现金补贴额外支付25.26美元(1美元 = 7.3人民币)。LTCI服务的平均自付费用为每次27.39美元,基本照护服务的费用低于平均水平,为16.44美元。亚组分析显示,受教育程度较高的个体更青睐医疗照护,而受教育程度较低的群体则更看重可承受性。重度残疾个体更倾向于专业照护者,如注册护士。本研究强调了扩大医疗照护服务、整合灵活补偿模式以及根据人口统计学差异制定政策的必要性。研究结果为优化中国的LTCI系统提供了证据,并为低收入和中等收入国家的老龄人口提供了见解。

相似文献

3
Preferences for long-term care insurance in China: Results from a discrete choice experiment.
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jul;281:114104. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114104. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
4
6
Preference of urban and rural older people in Shandong Province for long-term care insurance: based on discrete choice experiment.
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 15;12:1445273. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1445273. eCollection 2024.
7
Demand for Long-Term Care Insurance in China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 22;15(1):6. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15010006.
8
Incorporating discrete choice experiments into long-term care insurance policy decisions: evidence from China.
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 18;13:1511001. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1511001. eCollection 2025.
9
Older adults preferences for long-term caregivers in China: a discrete choice experiment.
Public Health. 2024 Jun;231:158-165. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.03.022. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
10
Health effects of long-term care insurance on spouses of disabled people: a quasi-experimental study.
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Oct 19;23(1):679. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04344-9.

本文引用的文献

2
Long-term care insurance, mental health of the elderly and its spillovers.
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 3;11:982656. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.982656. eCollection 2023.
3
4
Delayed Medical Care And Unmet Care Needs Due To The COVID-19 Pandemic Among Adults With Disabilities In The US.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Oct;41(10):1505-1512. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00509.
5
Global Healthcare Needs Related to COVID-19: An Evidence Map of the First Year of the Pandemic.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 19;19(16):10332. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610332.
7
Preferences for long-term care insurance in China: Results from a discrete choice experiment.
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jul;281:114104. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114104. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
8
Preferences for private long-term care insurance products in a super-ageing society: A discrete choice experiment in Hong Kong.
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Feb;270:113632. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113632. Epub 2020 Dec 20.
10
Incorporating discrete choice experiments into policy decisions: Case of designing public long-term care insurance.
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Aug;258:113044. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113044. Epub 2020 May 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验