• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于PMC指数模型的中国长期护理保险政策量化评估研究——以16份试点政策文本为例

A quantitative evaluation study of China's Long-Term Care insurance policies based on the PMC index model: A case study of 16 pilot policy texts.

作者信息

Wang Yuzi, Wang Weizheng, Zhang Yujie, Zeng Yuan

机构信息

School of Social Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, Beijing, China.

School of Philosophy and Social Development, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Apr 11;20(4):e0321057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321057. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0321057
PMID:40215459
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11991724/
Abstract

China's Long-Term Care Insurance (LTCI) system is designed to address the caregiving needs of elderly individuals with disabilities and dementia, focusing on long-term care to ensure adequate survival and quality of life for disabled individuals. This study employs the PMC index model to evaluate LTCI policies in 16 pilot cities, including Changchun and Qingdao, using keyword extraction and social network analysis on the latest policy documents from these cities. The study revealed the following findings: (1) Among the 16 cities, only Qingdao's policy achieved a "perfect" rating, with two policies rated as "excellent," 11 as "acceptable," and two as "poor." (2) While most cities allow the involvement of commercial insurance in LTCI administration, there is a lack of clear policy direction for the assessment and service provision by commercial insurers. (3) Dementia care receives significantly less attention compared to physical disabilities. (4) Most cities have underdeveloped financing mechanisms, and family caregiving services are undervalued. Moreover, an analysis of representative policies based on the PMC surface indicates substantial differences between the pilot cities, with Qingdao's "perfect" policy serving as a model for future LTCI development. The study offers several recommendations: (1) Improve caregiver support policies to enhance family caregiving services. (2) Expand funding sources to increase the equity of LTCI financing. (3) Allocate insurance policy resources more effectively to gradually eliminate policy barriers. (4) Increase the focus on dementia care and clarify the criteria for assessing disability. (5) Strengthen the preventive function of LTCI and progressively expand its coverage. This research provides critical insights into the ongoing development of China's LTCI system and proposes viable strategies for promoting equity and sustainable growth.

摘要

中国长期护理保险(LTCI)制度旨在满足残疾及失智老年人的护理需求,专注于长期护理以确保残疾人士有足够的生存保障和生活质量。本研究采用PMC指数模型,通过对长春、青岛等16个试点城市的最新政策文件进行关键词提取和社会网络分析,来评估这些城市的长期护理保险政策。研究结果如下:(1)在16个城市中,只有青岛的政策获得了“完美”评级,两项政策评为“优秀”,11项评为“可接受”,两项评为“较差”。(2)虽然大多数城市允许商业保险参与长期护理保险管理,但商业保险公司在评估和服务提供方面缺乏明确的政策指导。(3)与身体残疾护理相比,失智护理受到的关注明显较少。(4)大多数城市的融资机制不发达,家庭护理服务被低估。此外,基于PMC曲面的代表性政策分析表明,试点城市之间存在很大差异,青岛的“完美”政策可作为未来长期护理保险发展的典范。该研究提出了几点建议:(1)完善护理人员支持政策,加强家庭护理服务。(2)扩大资金来源,提高长期护理保险融资的公平性。(3)更有效地分配保险政策资源,逐步消除政策障碍。(4)增加对失智护理的关注,明确残疾评估标准。(5)强化长期护理保险的预防功能,逐步扩大覆盖范围。本研究为中国长期护理保险制度的持续发展提供了关键见解,并提出了促进公平和可持续增长的可行策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9a/11991724/d2836ce15915/pone.0321057.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9a/11991724/76cb0f806a34/pone.0321057.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9a/11991724/eceed08a0e44/pone.0321057.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9a/11991724/1f18d5ad5bed/pone.0321057.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9a/11991724/2980713b9a4f/pone.0321057.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9a/11991724/9c44c8afa2bb/pone.0321057.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9a/11991724/cbf1e8b909ea/pone.0321057.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9a/11991724/ba45c80baabf/pone.0321057.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9a/11991724/cc85a9f99ca2/pone.0321057.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9a/11991724/d2836ce15915/pone.0321057.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9a/11991724/76cb0f806a34/pone.0321057.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9a/11991724/eceed08a0e44/pone.0321057.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9a/11991724/1f18d5ad5bed/pone.0321057.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9a/11991724/2980713b9a4f/pone.0321057.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9a/11991724/9c44c8afa2bb/pone.0321057.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9a/11991724/cbf1e8b909ea/pone.0321057.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9a/11991724/ba45c80baabf/pone.0321057.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9a/11991724/cc85a9f99ca2/pone.0321057.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9a/11991724/d2836ce15915/pone.0321057.g009.jpg

相似文献

1
A quantitative evaluation study of China's Long-Term Care insurance policies based on the PMC index model: A case study of 16 pilot policy texts.基于PMC指数模型的中国长期护理保险政策量化评估研究——以16份试点政策文本为例
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 11;20(4):e0321057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321057. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluation of long-term care insurance pilot city policies in China: a cross-sectional study.中国长期护理保险试点城市政策评估:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 21;13:1570794. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1570794. eCollection 2025.
3
Evaluation of China's long-term care insurance policies.中国长期护理保险政策评估。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 28;12:1252817. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1252817. eCollection 2024.
4
Assessing the Sustainability of Long-Term Care Insurance Systems Based on a Policy-Population-Economy Complex System: The Case Study of China.基于政策-人口-经济复杂系统评估长期护理保险制度的可持续性:以中国为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 27;19(11):6554. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116554.
5
Why are people with dementia overlooked in long-term care insurance policy in Guangzhou, China?在中国广州的长期护理保险政策中,为什么患有痴呆症的人被忽视了?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 24;24(1):1646. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12126-1.
6
Review of evolution of the public long-term care insurance (LTCI) system in different countries: influence and challenge.不同国家公共长期护理保险(LTCI)制度演变的回顾:影响与挑战。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 20;20(1):1057. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05878-z.
7
Evaluation of Long-Term Care Insurance Policy in Chinese Pilot Cities.中国试点城市长期护理保险政策评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 11;16(20):3826. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16203826.
8
Long-Term Care Insurance Pilot Programme in China: Policy Evaluation and Optimization Options-Taking the Pilot Programme in the Northeast of China as an Example.中国长期护理保险试点项目:政策评估与优化选择——以中国东北地区的试点项目为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 3;19(7):4298. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074298.
9
China's policy experimentation on long-term care insurance: Implications for access.中国长期护理保险政策试验:对可及性的影响。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Oct;34(4):e1661-e1674. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2879. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
10
Health effects of long-term care insurance on spouses of disabled people: a quasi-experimental study.长期护理保险对失能者配偶健康的影响:一项准实验研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Oct 19;23(1):679. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04344-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Geographical location as a determinant of caregiver burden: a rural-urban analysis of the informal caregiving, health, and healthcare survey in Ghana.地理位置对照顾者负担的影响:加纳非正式护理、健康和医疗保健调查的城乡分析。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 28;25(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02562-7.
2
Long-run consequences of informal elderly care and implications of public long-term care insurance.长期非正规老年护理的后果和公共长期护理保险的影响。
J Health Econ. 2024 Jun;96:102884. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2024.102884. Epub 2024 May 3.
3
Services in public long-term care insurance in Japan.
日本公共长期护理保险服务。
Ann Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Jun 10;6(1):1-4. doi: 10.37737/ace.24001. eCollection 2024.
4
Growing old in China in socioeconomic and epidemiological context: systematic review of social care policy for older people.在中国社会经济和流行病学背景下的老龄化:老年人社会关怀政策的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 30;23(1):1272. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15583-1.
5
The impact of long-term care insurance system on family care: Evidence from China.长期护理保险制度对家庭照料的影响:来自中国的证据。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2023 Sep;38(5):1435-1452. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3672. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
6
Public long-term care insurance and consumption of elderly households: Evidence from China.公共长期护理保险与老年家庭消费:来自中国的证据。
J Health Econ. 2023 Jul;90:102759. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2023.102759. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
7
Long-Term Care Insurance Pilot Programme in China: Policy Evaluation and Optimization Options-Taking the Pilot Programme in the Northeast of China as an Example.中国长期护理保险试点项目:政策评估与优化选择——以中国东北地区的试点项目为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 3;19(7):4298. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074298.
8
Long-term care insurance and the well-being of older adults and their families: Evidence from China.长期护理保险与老年人及其家庭的福祉:来自中国的证据
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Mar;296:114745. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114745. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
9
The impacts of long-term care insurance on health care utilization and expenditure: evidence from China.长期护理保险对医疗保健利用和支出的影响:来自中国的证据。
Health Policy Plan. 2022 Jun 13;37(6):717-727. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac003.
10
Shifting from Fragmentation to Integration: A Systematic Analysis of Long-Term Care Insurance Policies in China.从碎片化到整合:中国长期护理保险政策的系统分析
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Sep 17;21(3):11. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5676. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.