Cao Hengkui, Yin Gang, Bao Xinyu, Tao Hongbing
School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Research Center for Hospital High Quality Development, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Apr 12;24(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02468-5.
Integrated care services have been initiated in China for several years, yet there remains a dearth of substantial evidence and research elucidating the service's efficacy, particularly in underdeveloped areas. This study aims to address this gap by evaluating the effectiveness of integrated care from the patients' perspective, thereby offering practical strategies to improve service effectiveness and promote health equity within county medical alliances.
The Patient Perceptions of Integrated Care (PPIC) and European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5 L) scales were employed to gather information on patients' perceptions of integrated care and their self-rated health status. A total of 1093 respondents from two pilot areas were selected for data collection. T-tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were recruited, additionally, the study utilized multiple linear regression models to examine the specific impact of various factors on the effectiveness of integrated care services.
The average score for the effectiveness of integrated healthcare services from the patients' perspective was 67.72 (SD = 14.443, n = 1093). Statistical analysis revealed that as the respondents' age increased and their self-rated health declined, the PPIC scores showed an upward trend. Regression analysis found that factors such as age, education level, income, health status, and level of healthcare intervention significantly influenced PPIC scores. Overall, there is a trend where respondents with higher health needs tend to have higher perceptions of the service, while those with relatively higher socioeconomic status are more likely to provide lower ratings. Additionally, increasing the frequency and duration of healthcare interventions can improve respondents' evaluations of the services.
This study analyzes the effectiveness of integrated services in China's county-level medical alliance from the patients' perspective. It finds progress in resource integration and efficiency but identifies limitations in implementation, particularly in balancing equity. Socio-economic factors continue to affect the fairness of service utilization and patient satisfaction. Constraints in finance, human capital, and technology hinder the provision of more targeted services for vulnerable groups. To promote health equity, future services need to focus more on key populations and provide more targeted services, accelerate the integration of information technology, and expand service coverage to address the diverse needs of marginalized communities.
中国开展综合医疗服务已有数年,但仍缺乏大量证据和研究来阐明该服务的效果,尤其是在欠发达地区。本研究旨在通过从患者角度评估综合医疗服务的有效性来填补这一空白,从而提供切实可行的策略,以提高服务效果并促进县域医共体中的健康公平。
采用综合医疗服务患者认知量表(PPIC)和欧洲五维度五水平健康量表(EQ-5D-5L)收集患者对综合医疗服务的认知以及自我评定健康状况的信息。从两个试点地区选取了1093名受访者进行数据收集。采用t检验和单因素方差分析,此外,本研究利用多元线性回归模型来检验各种因素对综合医疗服务效果的具体影响。
从患者角度来看,综合医疗服务有效性的平均得分为67.72(标准差=14.443,n=1093)。统计分析表明,随着受访者年龄的增长以及自我评定健康状况的下降,PPIC得分呈上升趋势。回归分析发现,年龄、教育水平、收入、健康状况和医疗干预水平等因素对PPIC得分有显著影响。总体而言,存在一种趋势,即健康需求较高的受访者对服务的认知往往较高,而社会经济地位相对较高的受访者给出较低评分的可能性更大。此外,增加医疗干预的频率和时长可以提高受访者对服务的评价。
本研究从患者角度分析了中国县域医共体中综合医疗服务的有效性。研究发现,在资源整合和效率方面取得了进展,但也发现了实施过程中的局限性,尤其是在平衡公平性方面。社会经济因素继续影响服务利用的公平性和患者满意度。资金、人力资本和技术方面的限制阻碍了为弱势群体提供更具针对性的服务。为促进健康公平,未来的服务需要更多地关注重点人群并提供更具针对性的服务,加速信息技术整合,并扩大服务覆盖范围,以满足边缘化社区的多样化需求。