Suppr超能文献

五种估算肾小球滤过率方程在越南肾移植受者中的性能:一项横断面研究。

Performance of Five Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Equations in Vietnamese Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Tran Tam Thai Thanh, Pham Tho Kieu Anh, Nguyen Nghia Nhu, Truong Thao Minh, Ho Hoang Nguyen Huy, Hoang Chuan Khac, Thai Sam Minh, Huynh An Bao

机构信息

Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, An Khanh Ward, Ninh Kieu District, Can Tho City, Vietnam.

Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, An Khanh Ward, Ninh Kieu District, Can Tho City, Vietnam.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2025 Apr;39(4):e70145. doi: 10.1111/ctr.70145.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the critical role of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) assessment in monitoring kidney transplants, the most accurate estimate remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of established estimated GFR (eGFR) equations in the Vietnamese population.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study involving 299 Vietnamese kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) compared measured GFR (mGFR), determined using technetium-99m-diethylenetriaminepentaacetate (Tc-DTPA) renal dynamic scintigraphy, with five eGFR equations (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD], Asian modified Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration [CKD-EPI], CKD-EPI SCysC 2012, CKD-EPI SCr 2021, and CKD-EPI SCr-SCysC 2021). The performances of the five eGFR equations were compared based on bias, P accuracy, absolute accuracy, precision, root mean square error (RMSE), concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

CKD-EPI SCr-SCysC 2021 showed the best performance. The values for median bias, P accuracy, absolute accuracy, precision, RMSE, CCC, and r were: 2.57 [1.22; 3.55] mL/min/1.73 m, 87.6% [83.3; 90.6], 10.0% [8.3; 11.7], 11.29 [9.57; 13.40] mL/min/1.73 m, 11.54 [10.42; 12.92], 0.787 [0.737; 0.828], and 0.810 [0.759; 0.850], respectively. The MDRD equation did not show significantly lower precision and accuracy than the CKD-EPI SCr-SCysC 2021 equation. All five equations demonstrated improved accuracy in the mGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m subgroup compared to the mGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

CKD-EPI SCr-SCysC 2021 is the most accurate eGFR equation for Vietnamese KTRs. Further studies with larger cohorts and comparisons with gold-standard methods are needed to confirm these findings.

摘要

背景

尽管肾小球滤过率(GFR)评估在监测肾移植中起着关键作用,但最准确的估计值仍不确定。本研究旨在评估已建立的估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)方程在越南人群中的性能。

方法

这项横断面研究纳入了299名越南肾移植受者(KTR),将使用锝-99m-二乙三胺五乙酸(Tc-DTPA)肾动态闪烁显像测定的实测GFR(mGFR)与五个eGFR方程(肾脏病饮食改良[MDRD]、亚洲改良慢性肾脏病流行病学协作组[CKD-EPI]、CKD-EPI SCysC 2012、CKD-EPI SCr 2021和CKD-EPI SCr-SCysC 2021)进行比较。基于偏差、P准确性、绝对准确性、精密度、均方根误差(RMSE)、一致性相关系数(CCC)和皮尔逊相关系数(r)及其95%置信区间(CI),比较了五个eGFR方程的性能。

结果

CKD-EPI SCr-SCysC 2021表现最佳。中位数偏差、P准确性、绝对准确性、精密度、RMSE、CCC和r的值分别为:2.57 [1.22;3.55] mL/min/1.73 m²、87.6% [83.3;90.6]、10.0% [8.3;11.7]、11.29 [9.57;13.40] mL/min/1.73 m²、11.54 [10.42;12.92]、0.787 [0.737;0.828]和0.810 [0.759;0.850]。MDRD方程的精密度和准确性并不显著低于CKD-EPI SCr-SCysC 2021方程。与mGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m²亚组相比,所有五个方程在mGFR≥60 mL/min/1.73 m²亚组中的准确性均有所提高。

结论

CKD-EPI SCr-SCysC 2021是越南KTR中最准确的eGFR方程。需要进一步开展更大样本量的队列研究,并与金标准方法进行比较以证实这些发现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验