• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于首次使用肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)治疗失败的轴向脊柱关节炎(AxSpA)患者,最佳选择是换用司库奇尤单抗还是换用其他肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂进行循环治疗?

Which Is the Best Option for AxSpA Patients After First TNFi Failure: Switch to Secukinumab or Cycling With Other TNFi?

作者信息

Kaya Mehmet Nur, Tecer Duygu, Kılıç Özlem, Yılmaz Sedat

机构信息

University of Health Sciences Turkey, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Rheumatology Department, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Rheum Dis. 2025 Apr;28(4):e70212. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.70212.

DOI:10.1111/1756-185X.70212
PMID:40223485
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Evaluation of drug survival and predictive factors of alternative tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) and secukinumab (SEC) use after TNFi therapy in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

METHODS

This was an observational retrospective study of axSpA patients who switched to second-line biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) between January 2018 and February 2023. Drug retention rate was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test. Factors associated with drug survival of the second bDMARD were analyzed by multivariate regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 201 axSpA patients (alternative TNFi: 143 patients, SEC: 58 patients) with a mean age 37.1 ± 8.6 years and consist of 58.2% male were included. Clinical characteristics and laboratory results at switching were comparable between groups. During a median follow-up period of 22.3 months, 80 (39.8%) of 201 patients discontinued bDMARD. Median follow-up period, drug discontinuation frequency, and drug retention rate were similar between groups. C-reactive protein (CRP) level (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.95-0.99, p = 0.032) and primary failure (HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.03-2.27, p = 0.037) were significantly associated with the risk of TNFi discontinuation. Smoking (HR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.05-3.69, p = 0.036) and Achilles enthesitis (HR = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.09-3.40, p = 0.024) were significantly associated with the risk of SEC discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

In axSpA exposed to a TNFi, switching to a second TNFi has comparable effectiveness to switching to SEC. SEC may be a better option in patients who experienced primary failure of TNFi, whereas an alternative TNFi may be preferred in patients with higher CRP levels or Achilles enthesitis, or who are currently smoking.

摘要

目的

评估强直性脊柱炎(axSpA)患者在肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)治疗后改用二线生物改善病情抗风湿药(bDMARD)时,改用其他肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)和司库奇尤单抗(SEC)的药物留存率及预测因素。

方法

这是一项针对2018年1月至2023年2月期间改用二线bDMARD的axSpA患者的观察性回顾性研究。使用Kaplan-Meier分析和对数秩检验评估药物留存率。通过多因素回归分析分析与第二种bDMARD药物留存相关的因素。

结果

共纳入201例axSpA患者(改用其他TNFi:143例患者,SEC:58例患者),平均年龄37.1±8.6岁,男性占58.2%。两组在换药时的临床特征和实验室检查结果具有可比性。在中位随访期22.3个月期间,201例患者中有80例(39.8%)停用了bDMARD。两组的中位随访期、药物停药频率和药物留存率相似。C反应蛋白(CRP)水平(风险比(HR)=0.98,95%置信区间(CI)=0.95-0.99,p=0.032)和初次治疗失败(HR=1.52,95%CI=1.03-2.27,p=0.037)与TNFi停药风险显著相关。吸烟(HR=1.96,95%CI=1.05-3.69,p=0.036)和跟腱附着点炎(HR=1.93,95%CI=1.09-3.40,p=0.024)与SEC停药风险显著相关。

结论

在接受TNFi治疗的axSpA患者中,改用第二种TNFi与改用SEC的疗效相当。对于TNFi初次治疗失败的患者,SEC可能是更好的选择;而对于CRP水平较高、患有跟腱附着点炎或正在吸烟的患者,改用其他TNFi可能更合适。

相似文献

1
Which Is the Best Option for AxSpA Patients After First TNFi Failure: Switch to Secukinumab or Cycling With Other TNFi?对于首次使用肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)治疗失败的轴向脊柱关节炎(AxSpA)患者,最佳选择是换用司库奇尤单抗还是换用其他肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂进行循环治疗?
Int J Rheum Dis. 2025 Apr;28(4):e70212. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.70212.
2
Effectiveness of secukinumab versus an alternative TNF inhibitor in patients with axial spondyloarthritis previously exposed to TNF inhibitors in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management cohort.在瑞士临床质量管理队列中,先前接受过 TNF 抑制剂治疗的轴性脊柱关节炎患者中,司库奇尤单抗与另一种 TNF 抑制剂的疗效比较。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Sep;79(9):1203-1209. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215934. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
3
Analysis of the shorter drug survival times for Janus kinase inhibitors and interleukin-17 inhibitors compared with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in a real-world cohort of axial spondyloarthritis patients - a retrospective analysis from the RHADAR network.真实世界队列中轴性脊柱关节炎患者中与肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂相比,Janus 激酶抑制剂和白细胞介素-17 抑制剂药物生存时间更短的分析 - RHADAR 网络的回顾性分析。
Rheumatol Int. 2024 Oct;44(10):2057-2066. doi: 10.1007/s00296-024-05671-9. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
4
Different drug survival of first line tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a multicentre retrospective survey.一线肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂在影像学和非影像学轴向脊柱关节炎中的不同药物生存:一项多中心回顾性调查。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019 Sep-Oct;37(5):762-767. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
5
Tocilizumab and rituximab have similar effectiveness and are both superior to a second tumour necrosis factor inhibitor in rheumatoid arthritis patients who discontinued a first TNF inhibitor.托珠单抗和利妥昔单抗疗效相似,对于停用第一种肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂的类风湿关节炎患者,二者均优于第二种肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂。
Acta Reumatol Port. 2019 Apr-Jun;44(2):103-113.
6
Retention rate and effectiveness of secukinumab vs TNF inhibitor in ankylosing spondylitis patients with prior TNF inhibitor exposure.有既往 TNF 抑制剂暴露史的强直性脊柱炎患者中司库奇尤单抗与 TNF 抑制剂的保留率和疗效。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Dec 1;60(12):5743-5752. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab245.
7
Factors affecting drug survival of an alternative TNF inhibitor and secukinumab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis switching from the first TNF inhibitor.从第一种肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)抑制剂转换治疗的强直性脊柱炎患者中,影响一种替代TNF抑制剂和司库奇尤单抗药物留存率的因素
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021 Apr 12;13:1759720X211009021. doi: 10.1177/1759720X211009021. eCollection 2021.
8
Does the reason for discontinuation of a first TNF inhibitor influence the effectiveness of a second TNF inhibitor in axial spondyloarthritis? Results from the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Cohort.首次使用的肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂停药原因是否会影响第二次使用的肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂对轴性脊柱关节炎的疗效?来自瑞士临床质量管理队列的结果。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Mar 22;18:71. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-0969-2.
9
The cost-effectiveness of a bimekizumab versus IL-17A inhibitors treatment-pathway in patients with active axial spondyloarthritis in Scotland.在苏格兰活动性中轴型脊柱关节炎患者中,比美吉珠单抗与白细胞介素-17A抑制剂治疗途径的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):682-696. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2342209. Epub 2024 May 2.
10
Drug retention rate and predictive factors of drug survival for secukinumab in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis.司库奇尤单抗治疗放射学阳性中轴型脊柱关节炎的药物留存率及药物生存预测因素
Rheumatol Int. 2023 Jan;43(1):147-156. doi: 10.1007/s00296-022-05213-1. Epub 2022 Sep 21.