Zhu Xinying, Zhou Gongli, Zhou Ying, Chen Chen, Sui Lin, Ou Di, Yan Yuqi, Zhou Lingyan, Jin Zhiyan, Huang Jiaheng, Zheng Yin, Ni Chen, Lai Min, Lv Lujiao, Shen Jiafei, Cheng Fang, Kong Xiangkai, Zhang Xuefeng, Xu Ke, Su Ruiqing, Liu Ying, Dong Gang, Wang Shurong, Ge Minghua, Xu Dong
Department of Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging & Interventional Therapy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Zhejiang Provincial Research Center for Cancer Intelligent Diagnosis and Molecular Technology, Hangzhou, China.
Int J Hyperthermia. 2025 Dec;42(1):2482716. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2025.2482716. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for multifocal papillary thyroid carcinoma (M-PTC) and compare these outcomes with those for unifocal papillary thyroid carcinoma (U-PTC).
This retrospective multicenter study included 465 patients (367 women and 98 men) who underwent RFA for either U-PTC (411 patients) or M-PTC (54 patients) between May 2015 and October 2022. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-RFA, then every 6 months in the second year, and annually thereafter. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), local tumor progression rate (LTP), tumor volume, volume reduction rate (VRR), tumor complete response rate (CDR), and complications were evaluated and compared between the M-PTC and U-PTC groups during the follow-up period.
The median follow-up time was 23 months. The median follow-up time for the U-PTC and M-PTC groups was 23 months and 23.5 months, respectively. The overall local tumor progression rate was 0.9% (4/465), and the overall complication rate was 0.6% (3/465). After PSM, no significant differences were observed between the U-PTC and M-PTC groups regarding tumor volume ( = 0.377), VRR ( = 0.151), CDR (50% vs. 44.2%, = 0.556), or LTP (1.9% vs. 0%, = 0.556). Additionally, the complication rates were not significantly different between the groups (1.03% vs. 2.5%, = 0.343).
After adequate preoperative evaluation, RFA is an effective and safe treatment for appropriately selected patients with M-PTC, with a prognosis similar to that of U-PTC.
本研究旨在评估射频消融(RFA)治疗多灶性甲状腺乳头状癌(M-PTC)的疗效和安全性,并将这些结果与单灶性甲状腺乳头状癌(U-PTC)的结果进行比较。
这项回顾性多中心研究纳入了2015年5月至2022年10月期间接受RFA治疗U-PTC(411例患者)或M-PTC(54例患者)的465例患者(367例女性和98例男性)。患者在RFA术后1、3、6和12个月进行随访,然后在第二年每6个月随访一次,此后每年随访一次。在进行1:1倾向评分匹配(PSM)后,评估并比较随访期间M-PTC组和U-PTC组的局部肿瘤进展率(LTP)、肿瘤体积、体积缩小率(VRR)、肿瘤完全缓解率(CDR)和并发症。
中位随访时间为23个月。U-PTC组和M-PTC组的中位随访时间分别为23个月和23.5个月。总体局部肿瘤进展率为0.9%(4/465),总体并发症发生率为0.6%(3/465)。PSM后,U-PTC组和M-PTC组在肿瘤体积(P = 0.377)、VRR(P = 0.151)、CDR(50%对44.2%,P = 0.556)或LTP(1.9%对0%,P = 0.556)方面未观察到显著差异。此外,两组间并发症发生率也无显著差异(1.03%对2.5%,P = 0.343)。
经过充分的术前评估后,RFA对于适当选择的M-PTC患者是一种有效且安全的治疗方法,其预后与U-PTC相似。