Triage of women with positive HPV: comparing DNA ploidy analysis with HPV 16/18 genotyping and cervical cytology.

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer screening primarily uses the human papillomavirus (HPV) test with partial genotyping (HPV 16/18) and liquid-based cytology using ThinPrep cytology test (TCT) to triage women with a positive HPV test. Although quantitative DNA ploidy analysis has shown reliability, its integration into screening guidelines as a triage test, compared to partial genotyping and TCT, has not been fully established. The objective of the study is to evaluate the clinical utility of DNA ploidy analysis as a triage test for women with a positive HPV test in primary screening, comparing it to HPV 16/18 genotyping and TCT.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 335 women aged ≥18 years who participated in a cervical cancer screening program at Shanghai Ruijin Hospital and underwent triage using HPV 16/18, TCT, and DNA ploidy testing. The sensitivities and specificities of these methods, both individually and combined, were evaluated.

RESULTS

The test showed sensitivities and specificities of 35.4% and 76.1% for HPV 16/18, 29.2% and 88.2% for TCT, and 93.8% and 92.7% for DNA ploidy, respectively. Combining these tests improved outcomes, with DNA ploidy plus HPV 16/18 genotyping showing enhanced sensitivity and high specificity. Notably, DNA ploidy alone identified high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and cervical cancer with a higher detection rate and lower positivity rate in triage than HPV 16/18 and TCT.

CONCLUSIONS

DNA ploidy analysis demonstrated superior specificity and sensitivity in the triage of women with positive HPV test results, offering a more effective alternative for detecting high-grade lesions and cervical cancer. These findings support the potential of integrating DNA ploidy into current cervical cancer screening protocols to enhance triage effectiveness and reduce unnecessary colposcopy referrals.