Department of Cancer Prevention, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Warsaw PhD School in Natural and BioMedical Sciences, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology in Warsaw, Poland.
Pol J Pathol. 2021;72(3):261-266. doi: 10.5114/pjp.2021.112832.
We have aimed to study reasons for reporting false-negative cytology results preceding diagnosis of interval cervical cancers (CC) in Poland. Data on all Pap smears collected in the organised screening in 2010-2015 were retrieved from the electronic database and linked with Polish National Cancer Registry (PNCR) data. False-negative results were defined as those sampled and assessed normal up to 3.5 years before diagnosis of invasive CC. False-negative slides were then seeded among twice as many randomly selected slides from the same lab and reviewed independently by three expert cytomorphologists. New diagnosis was established when experts agreed on a result. Of 48 selected false-negative slides, 1 case was diagnosed as a low-grade abnormality, 22 cases as a high-grade abnormalities, 3 cases as unsatisfactory for evaluation and 5 as no intraepithelial lesion of malignancy (NILM) by all three experts. There was no agreement in 17 cases. Percentages of agreement between experts was 64.6. Interobserver agreement rate was moderate with Fleiss' κ values. Our pilot study indicates evaluation errors as the main reason of false-negative cytology preceding interval CC in the organized screening programme in Poland. True lack of abnormal cells on the slide is the next reason.
我们旨在研究在波兰,诊断为间隔性宫颈癌(CC)之前报告假阴性细胞学结果的原因。从电子数据库中检索了 2010 年至 2015 年所有在有组织筛查中收集的巴氏涂片,并与波兰国家癌症登记处(PNCR)的数据相关联。假阴性结果定义为在诊断浸润性 CC 前 3.5 年内取样并评估正常的结果。然后,将假阴性玻片随机与两倍数量的来自同一实验室的玻片混合,并由三位专家细胞学病理学家独立进行复查。当专家对结果达成一致时,就会做出新的诊断。在 48 张选定的假阴性玻片中有 1 例被诊断为低度异常,22 例为高度异常,3 例为评估不满意,5 例为所有三位专家均为无上皮内瘤变(NILM)。在 17 例中没有达成一致。专家之间的一致率为 64.6%。Fleiss'κ值显示专家之间的观测者一致性率为中度。我们的初步研究表明,在波兰有组织筛查计划中,导致假阴性细胞学检查结果的主要原因是评估错误,其次是载玻片上确实没有异常细胞。