Kemmochi Masahiko
Kemmochi Orthopedic Surgery Sports Clinic, 42-1 Higashi-honcho, Ota, Gunma Prefecture 373-0026, Japan.
Regen Ther. 2025 Mar 27;29:227-236. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2025.02.006. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Recent reviews suggest that PRP injections can improve pain and function more effectively than other treatments; however, consensus on the optimal number of injections is lacking. We aimed to determine the optimal administration frequency and number of PRP injections for management of osteoarthritis (OA) symptoms, to examine long-term effects and structural improvements with PRP, and to determine correlations between clinical outcomes and imaging findings.
This longitudinal study included 167 patients with knee OA, categorized using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading system. Participants received up to six PRP injections and were followed-up for 24 months. Pain levels were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS); functional recovery was measured using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). To determine whether PRP can induce sustained structural improvements, we used the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) to monitor changes in bone-marrow lesions (BMLs). Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance to identify significant changes in pain and functional outcomes.
VAS and KOOS scores significantly improved after PRP treatment. Patients with KL grades 1 and 2 exhibited maximum pain relief after the fourth injection; those with KL grades 3 and 4 showed optimal results after the fifth injection. Improvements were maintained or enhanced at the 24-month follow-up. The effect size increased as the number of treatments progressed, and especially after the fourth treatment, with a Cohen's d values of -1.22, -1.28, and -0.99 (p < 0.0001).
PRP injections administered at specific intervals can significantly reduce pain and improve function in patients with OA, with the required frequency depending on disease severity. These findings support the customization of PRP-treatment protocols based on individual patient profiles to maximize therapeutic benefits.
This study has been registered with the clinical trial register of the Japan Medical Association Center for Clinical Trials (JMA-IIA00351).
This study has been registered with the clinical trial register of the Japan Medical Association Center for Clinical Trials (JMA-IIA00351).
II.
近期综述表明,与其他治疗方法相比,注射富血小板血浆(PRP)能更有效地改善疼痛和功能;然而,对于最佳注射次数尚未达成共识。我们旨在确定用于治疗骨关节炎(OA)症状的PRP最佳给药频率和注射次数,研究PRP的长期效果和结构改善情况,并确定临床结果与影像学表现之间的相关性。
这项纵向研究纳入了167例膝骨关节炎患者,采用凯尔格伦-劳伦斯(KL)分级系统进行分类。参与者接受了多达6次PRP注射,并随访24个月。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛程度;使用膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分(KOOS)测量功能恢复情况。为了确定PRP是否能诱导持续的结构改善,我们使用MRI骨关节炎膝关节评分(MOAKS)来监测骨髓病变(BML)的变化。采用重复测量方差分析对数据进行分析,以确定疼痛和功能结果的显著变化。
PRP治疗后VAS和KOOS评分显著改善。KL 1级和2级患者在第四次注射后疼痛缓解最大;KL 3级和4级患者在第五次注射后显示出最佳效果。在24个月的随访中,改善情况得以维持或增强。随着治疗次数的增加,效应量增大,尤其是在第四次治疗后,科恩d值分别为-1.22、-1.28和-0.99(p < 0.0001)。
按特定间隔注射PRP可显著减轻OA患者的疼痛并改善功能,所需频率取决于疾病严重程度。这些发现支持根据个体患者情况定制PRP治疗方案,以最大化治疗益处。
本研究已在日本医学协会临床试验中心的临床试验注册库(JMA-IIA00351)注册。
本研究已在日本医学协会临床试验中心的临床试验注册库(JMA-IIA00351)注册。
II级。