Division of Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Aug;52(10):2493-2502. doi: 10.1177/03635465241263073. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
Intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections have been proposed for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA); however, their effectiveness in Japanese patients remains unclear.
To investigate whether 3 intra-articular injections of leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP) improve symptoms and joint function in symptomatic Japanese patients with mild to moderate knee OA.
Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
Of 72 patients screened, 30 were included and randomized to receive LP-PRP (n = 15) or saline (placebo; n = 15) injections between March 2019 and February 2023. Patients attended a screening visit and 3 treatment visits at 1 week apart, followed by 3 follow-up visits (at 4, 12, and 24 weeks) after the initial treatment visit. The primary efficacy outcome measure was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, whereas the secondary efficacy outcome measures were the proportion of patients showing a visual analog scale (VAS) improvement of ≥50%. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed to evaluate joint effusion and bone marrow lesions using the Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score. Patients were followed for 24 weeks.
Patients in the PRP group (mean age, 65.9 years) had a mean hip-knee-ankle angle of 5.1°, with 7 and 8 patients demonstrating Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 and 3 knee OA, respectively. Patients in the placebo group (mean age, 67.9 years) had a mean hip-knee-ankle angle of 3.8°, with 6 and 9 patients showing Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 and 3 knee OA, respectively. No significant differences were identified in any baseline factors. The percentage change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores from baseline to 24 weeks was significantly different (P= .032) between the PRP (median, 75.9%; quantile 1 [Q1], 49.6; quantile 3 [Q3], 94.1]) and placebo (median, 27.7%; Q1, -9.4; Q3, 80.9]) groups. Overall, 73.3% and 28.6% of the PRP group and placebo group, respectively, exhibited an improvement in visual analog scale scores of ≥50%, with a significant improvement observed in the PRP group ( = .027). Changes in bone marrow lesions from baseline to 24 weeks, as assessed on magnetic resonance imaging, significantly differed between groups ( = .017), with no significant differences in other secondary endpoints.
In Japanese patients with knee OA, 3 intra-articular LP-PRP injections led to clinical improvements at 24-week follow-up and significant functional improvements and pain relief after 24 weeks.
关节内富含血小板的血浆(PRP)注射已被提议用于治疗膝骨关节炎(OA);然而,其在日本患者中的疗效仍不清楚。
研究 3 次关节内白细胞减少富血小板血浆(LP-PRP)注射是否能改善有症状的日本轻至中度膝 OA 患者的症状和关节功能。
随机对照试验;证据水平,1 级。
在筛选的 72 名患者中,30 名患者被纳入并随机分为 LP-PRP(n=15)或生理盐水(安慰剂;n=15)组,在 1 周内进行 3 次注射。患者在初次治疗就诊后,分别在第 1 周、第 2 周和第 3 周就诊,然后在初次治疗就诊后 4 周、12 周和 24 周进行 3 次随访。主要疗效指标是西部安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分,次要疗效指标是视觉模拟量表(VAS)改善≥50%的患者比例。使用全器官磁共振成像评分(Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score)评估关节积液和骨髓病变。患者随访 24 周。
PRP 组(平均年龄 65.9 岁)的髋关节-膝关节-踝关节角度平均为 5.1°,7 名和 8 名患者分别显示 Kellgren-Lawrence 分级 2 级和 3 级膝 OA。安慰剂组(平均年龄 67.9 岁)的髋关节-膝关节-踝关节角度平均为 3.8°,6 名和 9 名患者分别显示 Kellgren-Lawrence 分级 2 级和 3 级膝 OA。两组患者在任何基线因素上均无显著差异。从基线到 24 周时,WOMAC 评分的变化在 PRP 组(中位数,75.9%;分位数 1 [Q1],49.6;分位数 3 [Q3],94.1%)和安慰剂组(中位数,27.7%;Q1,-9.4;Q3,80.9%)之间有显著差异(P=0.032)。PRP 组和安慰剂组分别有 73.3%和 28.6%的患者 VAS 评分改善≥50%,PRP 组有显著改善(=0.027)。从基线到 24 周,骨髓病变的变化在磁共振成像上有显著差异(=0.017),但其他次要终点无显著差异。
在日本膝骨关节炎患者中,3 次关节内 LP-PRP 注射可在 24 周随访时改善临床症状,并在 24 周后显著改善功能和缓解疼痛。