• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜下早期宫颈癌根治术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术可有效提高手术疗效。

Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection for early cervical cancer effectively improves surgical efficacy.

作者信息

Luo Mingyan, Liu Yuyang, Lv Yumei

机构信息

Western Theater Command General Hospital Chengdu 610083, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Am J Transl Res. 2025 Mar 15;17(3):2103-2111. doi: 10.62347/ULEY1927. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.62347/ULEY1927
PMID:40225975
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11982835/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) combined with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 58 cases of early cervical cancer who underwent surgical treatment at Western Theater Command General Hospital between January 2019 and September 2020. Patients were divided into two groups based on surgical approach: the observation group (n=26) received LRH and PLND without uterine manipulator, while the control group (n=32) underwent LRH with uterine manipulator and PLND. Clinical data including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, time to first flatus, postoperative hospital stay, number of lymph nodes dissected, and postoperative pain (VAS score at 7 days) were compared between groups. Serum tumor markers (CA125, CA199, CEA, and SCC) were measured and analyzed. Postoperative complications and quality of life were assessed during a 6-month follow-up period. Patients were further categorized into good prognosis (n=40, no recurrence) and poor prognosis (n=18, recurrence) groups based on 1-year follow-up outcomes to identify independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The observation group demonstrated significantly better outcomes compared to the control group, including shorter operative time, reduced intraoperative blood loss, earlier return of bowel function, shorter hospital stay, lower postoperative pain scores, and decreased serum tumor marker levels (all P<0.05). The observation group also had a higher number of lymph nodes dissected (P<0.05). Furthermore, this group showed a significantly lower incidence of postoperative complications and better quality of life at 6 months postoperatively (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis identified the number of lymph nodes dissected and surgical approach as independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

LRH without uterine manipulator combined with PLND demonstrates superior surgical outcomes, reduced complication rates, and improved recovery for patients with early-stage cervical cancer, representing a valuable advancement in clinical practice.

摘要

目的

评估腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术(LRH)联合盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)治疗早期宫颈癌患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

本回顾性研究分析了2019年1月至2020年9月在西部战区总医院接受手术治疗的58例早期宫颈癌患者。根据手术方式将患者分为两组:观察组(n = 26)接受无子宫操纵器的LRH和PLND,而对照组(n = 32)接受有子宫操纵器的LRH和PLND。比较两组患者的临床数据,包括手术时间、术中出血量、首次排气时间、术后住院时间、清扫淋巴结数量以及术后疼痛(术后7天的视觉模拟评分法[VAS]评分)。检测并分析血清肿瘤标志物(CA125、CA199、CEA和SCC)。在6个月的随访期内评估术后并发症和生活质量。根据1年随访结果将患者进一步分为预后良好组(n = 40,无复发)和预后不良组(n = 18,复发),以确定独立的预后因素。

结果

与对照组相比,观察组的各项结果均显著更好,包括手术时间更短、术中出血量减少、肠功能恢复更早、住院时间更短、术后疼痛评分更低以及血清肿瘤标志物水平降低(均P < 0.05)。观察组清扫的淋巴结数量也更多(P < 0.05)。此外,该组术后并发症发生率显著更低,术后6个月生活质量更好(P < 0.05)。多因素分析确定清扫淋巴结数量和手术方式为独立的预后因素。

结论

无子宫操纵器的LRH联合PLND对早期宫颈癌患者显示出更好的手术效果、更低的并发症发生率和更快的恢复,是临床实践中的一项重要进展。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection for early cervical cancer effectively improves surgical efficacy.腹腔镜下早期宫颈癌根治术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术可有效提高手术疗效。
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Mar 15;17(3):2103-2111. doi: 10.62347/ULEY1927. eCollection 2025.
2
[Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].[I a2-II a2期宫颈癌腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术后的长期肿瘤学结局:一项配对队列研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;50(12):894-901.
3
Complete Laparoscopic Type C2 Radical Surgery for Cervical Stump Cancer: No-Look and No-Touch Techniques.完全腹腔镜下 C2 型宫颈癌根治术:无接触、无窥视技术。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Aug;31(8):5111-5114. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15380-z. Epub 2024 May 10.
4
[Impact on survival and quality of life of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy to patients with early-stage cervical cancer].[腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术对早期宫颈癌患者生存及生活质量的影响]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Nov;46(11):854-9.
5
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer by pulling the round ligament without a uterine manipulator.腹腔镜下不使用子宫操纵器经圆韧带提拉法宫颈癌根治术。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Sep;264:31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.06.045. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
6
[Effects of colpotomic approaches on prognosis and recurrence sites of stage Ⅰa2-Ⅱa2 cervical cancer after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy].[阴道切开术式对Ⅰa2-Ⅱa2期宫颈癌腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术后预后及复发部位的影响]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Jan 25;58(1):49-59. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20221022-00647.
7
Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.中国老年宫颈癌患者机器人根治性子宫切除术与腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术的疗效和安全性结果比较
BMC Womens Health. 2018 May 1;18(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0544-x.
8
Clinical Outcomes in Early Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Nerve Plane-sparing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy.神经平面保留腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌患者的临床结局。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Mar-Apr;27(3):687-696. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.04.025. Epub 2019 May 7.
9
[Laparoscopic anatomical nerve sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a clinical analysis of 37 cases].[腹腔镜下保留神经的宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术:37例临床分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2009 May;44(5):359-63.
10
[Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early cervical adenocarcinoma].腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈腺癌的疗效与安全性
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Sep 25;55(9):600-608. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20200410-00313.

本文引用的文献

1
The anti-PD-1 era of cervical cancer: achievement, opportunity, and challenge.抗 PD-1 时代的宫颈癌:成就、机遇和挑战。
Front Immunol. 2023 Jul 25;14:1195476. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1195476. eCollection 2023.
2
Current gaps and opportunities in screening, prevention, and treatment of cervical cancer.宫颈癌筛查、预防和治疗的当前差距和机遇。
Cancer. 2022 Dec 1;128(23):4063-4073. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34487. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
3
Open vs minimally invasive radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: International Radical Trachelectomy Assessment Study.早期宫颈癌的开放性与微创根治性宫颈切除术:国际根治性宫颈切除术评估研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jan;226(1):97.e1-97.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.029. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
4
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer by pulling the round ligament without a uterine manipulator.腹腔镜下不使用子宫操纵器经圆韧带提拉法宫颈癌根治术。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Sep;264:31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.06.045. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
5
Strategies for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer with Bulky Pelvic Lymph Nodes: An Overview of the Current Evidence.治疗盆腔淋巴结肿大宫颈癌的策略:当前证据概述。
J UOEH. 2020;42(4):317-325. doi: 10.7888/juoeh.42.317.
6
Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.腹腔镜下无子宫操作器械的神经保护广泛性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌 IB 期:技术描述、LACC 试验时代后的经验和结果。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Apr;303(4):1039-1047. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05835-5. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
7
Comparison of long-term survival of total abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopy-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: Korean multicenter, retrospective analysis.比较早期宫颈癌患者行全腹广泛子宫切除术与腹腔镜辅助经阴道广泛子宫切除术的长期生存:韩国多中心回顾性分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Dec;159(3):642-648. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.035. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
8
Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: is the intra-uterine manipulator to blame?早期宫颈癌微创手术后的生存情况:宫内操作器是否有责任?
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Dec;30(12):1864-1870. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001816. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
9
The influence of learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopy on oncological outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer: an observational cohort study.机器人辅助腹腔镜手术学习曲线对早期宫颈癌肿瘤学结局的影响:一项观察性队列研究。
BJOG. 2021 Feb;128(3):563-571. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16399. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
10
Long non-coding RNA in cervical cancer: From biology to therapeutic opportunity.长链非编码 RNA 在宫颈癌中的作用:从生物学到治疗机会。
Biomed Pharmacother. 2020 Jul;127:110209. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110209. Epub 2020 May 20.