文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

创伤后应激障碍心理治疗无反应的患病率及预测因素:一项荟萃分析

Prevalence and Predictors of Nonresponse to Psychological Treatment for PTSD: A Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Semmlinger Verena, Leithner Cosima, Klöck Lea Maria, Ranftl Lena, Ehring Thomas, Schreckenbach Monika

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich 80802, Germany.

German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Munich 80802, Germany.

出版信息

Depress Anxiety. 2024 Jul 26;2024:9899034. doi: 10.1155/2024/9899034. eCollection 2024.


DOI:10.1155/2024/9899034
PMID:40226730
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11918500/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although highly efficacious psychological treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) exist, there is evidence that first-line psychological treatment approaches leave a substantial subgroup of patients still suffering from clinically relevant PTSD symptoms posttreatment. AIMS: We aimed to meta-analytically establish the prevalence and predictors of nonresponse to first-line guideline-recommended psychological treatments for PTSD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This meta-analysis was preregistered (CRD42023368766). We searched the PTSD Trials Standardized Data Repository, Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, and PTSDpubs. We included randomized controlled trials (RCT), reporting data on nonresponse operationalized by (lack of) symptom reduction in PTSD symptoms at posttreatment of first-line guideline-recommended PTSD treatments for adult patients meeting criteria for a PTSD diagnosis. All studies published by October 10, 2023, were included. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. We estimated the pooled average nonresponse rates and ORs. Subgroup and metaregression analyses targeting the nonresponse rates served to identify significant predictors. All analyses were conducted using three-level multilevel models. Study quality was assessed using Cochrane's RoB 2 tool. RESULTS: Eighty six studies with 117 active treatment conditions and 7,894 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The weighted average nonresponse rate was 39.23%, 95% CI (35.08%, 43.53%). Nonresponse was less frequent in the treatment condition compared to the control condition ( = 0.22). Subgroup analyses and metaregression revealed the type of analysis, population, type of intervention, treatment format, year of publication, age, sex, PTSD symptom severity, comorbid depression, and baseline depression score as significant predictors. The heterogeneity between studies was substantial to considerable (  = 83.12%). Half of the studies had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis found that a substantial subgroup of patients suffering from PTSD still showed clinically significant symptoms after having received treatment. Treatment modifications should be considered for specific subgroups of PTSD patients based on predictors found to be associated with nonresponse.

摘要

背景:尽管存在针对创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的高效心理治疗方法,但有证据表明,一线心理治疗方法使相当一部分患者在治疗后仍遭受与临床相关的PTSD症状困扰。 目的:我们旨在通过荟萃分析确定对PTSD一线指南推荐心理治疗无反应的患病率及预测因素。 材料与方法:该荟萃分析已预先注册(CRD42023368766)。我们检索了PTSD试验标准化数据存储库、Embase、Medline、PsychINFO和PTSDpubs。我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验报告了关于符合PTSD诊断标准的成年患者在一线指南推荐的PTSD治疗后,通过PTSD症状(未)减轻来界定的无反应数据。纳入了2023年10月10日前发表的所有研究。数据由两名独立审阅者提取。我们估计了合并平均无反应率和优势比。针对无反应率的亚组分析和元回归分析用于确定显著的预测因素。所有分析均使用三级多水平模型进行。使用Cochrane的RoB 2工具评估研究质量。 结果:荟萃分析纳入了86项研究,涉及117种积极治疗条件和7894名参与者。加权平均无反应率为39.23%,95%置信区间(35.08%,43.53%)。与对照条件相比,治疗条件下的无反应情况较少(比值比=0.22)。亚组分析和元回归显示,分析类型、人群、干预类型、治疗形式、发表年份、年龄、性别、PTSD症状严重程度、共病抑郁症以及基线抑郁评分是显著的预测因素。研究之间的异质性很大(I²=83.12%)。一半的研究存在高偏倚风险。 结论:该荟萃分析发现,相当一部分患有PTSD的患者在接受治疗后仍表现出具有临床意义的症状。应根据发现的与无反应相关的预测因素,考虑对特定亚组的PTSD患者进行治疗调整。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/500a/11918500/3aa72f9edb91/DA2024-9899034.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/500a/11918500/a3ec8c2fca88/DA2024-9899034.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/500a/11918500/3aa72f9edb91/DA2024-9899034.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/500a/11918500/a3ec8c2fca88/DA2024-9899034.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/500a/11918500/3aa72f9edb91/DA2024-9899034.002.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Prevalence and Predictors of Nonresponse to Psychological Treatment for PTSD: A Meta-Analysis.

Depress Anxiety. 2024-7-26

[2]
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1

[3]
Psychological and pharmacological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid mental health problems following complex traumatic events: Systematic review and component network meta-analysis.

PLoS Med. 2020-8-19

[4]
Internet-based cognitive and behavioural therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-12-14

[5]
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-traumatic stress disorder in adults.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-8-2

[6]
Present-centered therapy (PCT) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019-11-18

[7]
Internet-based cognitive and behavioural therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-5-20

[8]
Psychological therapies for the treatment of mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries affected by humanitarian crises.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-7-5

[9]
Psychological therapies for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents (Review).

Evid Based Child Health. 2013-5

[10]
Couple and family therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019-12-4

引用本文的文献

[1]
Biological mechanisms underlying adverse mental health outcome after trauma.

Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025-12

[2]
Are specific PTSD criteria associated with treatment outcome in traumatized veterans and police officers?

Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025-12

[3]
ILF-neurofeedback in clinical practice: examining symptom change and performance metrics across diagnostic groups.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2025-7-30

[4]
Symptom retention after successful intensive trauma-focused treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder.

Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025-12

[5]
Short- and Long-Term Effectiveness of Brief Intensive Trauma Treatment for Adolescents With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Their Caregivers: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

JMIR Res Protoc. 2025-4-30

本文引用的文献

[1]
Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A State-of-the-art Review.

Curr Neuropharmacol. 2024

[2]
Benchmarking quality of life to posttraumatic stress disorder symptom changes in cognitive processing therapy.

J Anxiety Disord. 2023-1

[3]
Worse off by waiting for treatment? The impact of waiting time on clinical course and treatment outcome for depression in routine care.

J Affect Disord. 2023-2-1

[4]
Exposure therapy for PTSD in military populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

J Anxiety Disord. 2022-8

[5]
Functional outcomes from psychotherapy for people with posttraumatic stress disorder: A meta-analysis.

J Anxiety Disord. 2022-6

[6]
A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions for comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder and substance use disorder.

Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022

[7]
Dropout from psychological interventions for refugees and asylum seekers: A meta-analysis.

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021-9

[8]
Treatment Guidelines for PTSD: A Systematic Review.

J Clin Med. 2021-9-15

[9]
Variable-length Cognitive Processing Therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in active duty military: Outcomes and predictors.

Behav Res Ther. 2021-6

[10]
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

BMJ. 2021-3-29

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索