• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加纳医学影像专业人员增强对人工智能系统信任的原则:一项全国性横断面研究。

Principles for enhancing trust in artificial intelligence systems among medical imaging professionals in Ghana: A nationwide cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Donkor A, Kumi D, Amponsah E, Della Atuwo-Ampoh V

机构信息

Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana; IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care Through Clinical Research and Translation), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Australia.

Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.

出版信息

Radiography (Lond). 2025 May;31(3):102953. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2025.102953. Epub 2025 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2025.102953
PMID:40228323
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To realise the full potential of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in medical imaging, it is crucial to address challenges, such as cyberterrorism to foster trust and acceptance. This study aimed to determine the principles that enhance trust in AI systems from the perspective of medical imaging professionals in Ghana.

METHODS

An anonymous, online, nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted. The survey contained questions related to socio-demographic characteristics and AI trustworthy principles, including "human agency and oversight", "technical robustness and safety", "data privacy, security and governance" and "transparency, fairness and accountability".

RESULTS

A total of 370 respondents completed the survey. Among the respondents, 66.5 % (n = 246) were diagnostic radiographers. Considerable number of respondents (n = 121, 32.7 %) reported having little or no understanding of how medical imaging AI systems work. Overall, 54.9 % (n = 203) of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed that each of the four principles was important to enhance trust in medical imaging AI systems, with a composite mean score of 3.88 ± 0.45. Transparency, fairness and accountability had the highest rating (4.27 ± 0.58), whereas the mean score for human agency and oversight was 3.89 ± 0.53. Technical robustness and safety as well as data privacy, security and governance obtained mean scores of 3.79 ± 0.61 and 3.58 ± 0.65, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Medical imaging professionals in Ghana agreed that human agency, technical robustness, data privacy and transparency are important principles to enhance trust in AI systems; however, future plans including medical imaging AI educational interventions are required to improve AI literacy among medical imaging professionals in Ghana.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The evidence presented should encourage organisations to design and deploy trustworthy medical imaging AI systems.

摘要

引言

为了充分发挥人工智能(AI)系统在医学成像中的潜力,应对诸如网络恐怖主义等挑战以促进信任和接受至关重要。本研究旨在从加纳医学成像专业人员的角度确定增强对AI系统信任的原则。

方法

进行了一项匿名的、在线的、全国性的横断面调查。该调查包含与社会人口特征和AI可信原则相关的问题,包括“人类能动性与监督”、“技术稳健性与安全性”、“数据隐私、安全与治理”以及“透明度、公平性与问责制”。

结果

共有370名受访者完成了调查。在受访者中,66.5%(n = 246)是诊断放射技师。相当数量的受访者(n = 121,32.7%)表示对医学成像AI系统的工作方式了解很少或根本不了解。总体而言,54.9%(n = 203)的受访者同意或强烈同意这四项原则中的每一项对于增强对医学成像AI系统的信任都很重要,综合平均得分为3.88±0.45。透明度、公平性与问责制的评分最高(4.27±0.58),而人类能动性与监督的平均得分为3.89±0.53。技术稳健性与安全性以及数据隐私、安全与治理的平均得分分别为3.79±0.61和3.58±0.65。

结论

加纳的医学成像专业人员一致认为,人类能动性、技术稳健性、数据隐私和透明度是增强对AI系统信任的重要原则;然而,需要包括医学成像AI教育干预在内的未来计划,以提高加纳医学成像专业人员的AI素养。

对实践的启示

所呈现的证据应鼓励组织设计和部署可信的医学成像AI系统。

相似文献

1
Principles for enhancing trust in artificial intelligence systems among medical imaging professionals in Ghana: A nationwide cross-sectional study.加纳医学影像专业人员增强对人工智能系统信任的原则:一项全国性横断面研究。
Radiography (Lond). 2025 May;31(3):102953. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2025.102953. Epub 2025 Apr 13.
2
Radiographers' perspectives on the emerging integration of artificial intelligence into diagnostic imaging: The Ghana study.放射技师对人工智能融入诊断成像的新兴观点:加纳研究。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2021 Sep;68(3):260-268. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.460. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
3
Towards secure and trusted AI in healthcare: A systematic review of emerging innovations and ethical challenges.迈向医疗保健领域安全可信的人工智能:对新兴创新和伦理挑战的系统综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Mar;195:105780. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105780. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
4
Trust in and Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Medicine: Mixed Methods Study.对人工智能在医学中的应用的信任和接受:混合方法研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Jan 17;11:e47031. doi: 10.2196/47031.
5
Trustworthy and ethical AI-enabled cardiovascular care: a rapid review.可信且合乎道德的人工智能赋能心血管护理:快速综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 4;24(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02653-6.
6
Navigating the ethical landscape of artificial intelligence in radiography: a cross-sectional study of radiographers' perspectives.医学影像学中人工智能伦理问题的探索:放射技师观点的横断面研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 11;25(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01052-w.
7
Public Perception on Artificial Intelligence-Driven Mental Health Interventions: Survey Research.公众对人工智能驱动的心理健康干预措施的看法:调查研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 28;8:e64380. doi: 10.2196/64380.
8
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Trust Framework and Maturity Model: Applying an Entropy Lens to Improve Security, Privacy, and Ethical AI.人工智能(AI)信任框架与成熟度模型:运用熵视角提升人工智能的安全性、隐私性及伦理道德性
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Oct 9;25(10):1429. doi: 10.3390/e25101429.
9
Radiographer Education and Learning in Artificial Intelligence (REAL-AI): A survey of radiographers, radiologists, and students' knowledge of and attitude to education on AI.放射技师人工智能教育与学习(REAL-AI):放射技师、放射科医生及学生对人工智能教育的知识与态度调查
Radiography (Lond). 2024 Dec;30 Suppl 2:79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.10.010. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
10
Data stewardship and curation practices in AI-based genomics and automated microscopy image analysis for high-throughput screening studies: promoting robust and ethical AI applications.基于人工智能的基因组学和用于高通量筛选研究的自动显微镜图像分析中的数据管理与整理实践:推动可靠且符合伦理的人工智能应用。
Hum Genomics. 2025 Feb 23;19(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40246-025-00716-x.