Suppr超能文献

中国CDK4/6抑制剂用于二线激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性晚期或转移性乳腺癌的成本效益分析

Cost-effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors for second-line HR+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer in China.

作者信息

Jia Caifeng, Zhang Sen, Wang Jie, Feng Bing, Shi Fenghao, Wang Meiqi, Li Sainan, Xu Hao, Wang Mingxia

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.

Department of Pharmacy, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 14;15(1):12765. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97504-3.

Abstract

Hormone receptor HR-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer is the most common subtype in China, representing 60-70% of cases, with a rising incidence due to aging demographics and lifestyle changes. CDK4/6 inhibitors such as palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib have been proven effective in treating HR+/HER2 - advanced or metastatic breast cancer (ABC/MBC), though they may increase healthcare costs. This study aims to compare the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors for the second-line treatment of HR+/HER2 - ABC/MBC from the Chinese healthcare perspective. A cohort-based partitioned survival model was utilized, drawing on the survival data published from PALOMA-3, MONALEESA-3 and MONARCH-2 trials. Costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were used to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) over a 15-year time horizon. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the model results. In the base-case analysis, the model estimated health benefits to be 2.10 QALYs for palbociclib plus fulvestrant (PAL + FUL), 2.55 QALYs for ribociclib plus fulvestrant (RIB + FUL), and 2.60 QALYs for abemaciclib plus fulvestrant (ABE + FUL), with corresponding costs of $34,423, $41,119, and $48,019. Compared with PAL + FUL, the ICERs were $27,161 per QALY for ABE + FUL and $15,073 per QALY for RIB + FUL. The robustness of these findings was confirmed through uncertainty analyses. Among the three strategies, the most cost-effective probabilities of PAL + FUL, RIB + FUL and ABE + FUL were 0%, 99.8%, and 0.2% under the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 3 times per-capita gross domestic product ($37,738) in China. This study indicated that both RIB + FUL and ABE + FUL are cost-effective at the WTP threshold compared with PAL + FUL. Notably, RIB + FUL offers the greatest cost-effective advantage for the second-line treatment of HR+/HER2 - ABC/MBC among these three CDK4/6 inhibitors.

摘要

激素受体HR阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HR+/HER2-)乳腺癌是中国最常见的亚型,占病例的60%-70%,由于人口老龄化和生活方式改变,其发病率呈上升趋势。哌柏西利、瑞博西尼和阿贝西利等细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6(CDK4/6)抑制剂已被证明可有效治疗HR+/HER2-晚期或转移性乳腺癌(ABC/MBC),尽管它们可能会增加医疗成本。本研究旨在从中国医疗保健角度比较CDK4/6抑制剂用于HR+/HER2-ABC/MBC二线治疗的疗效、安全性和成本效益。利用基于队列的分区生存模型,借鉴PALOMA-3、MONALEESA-3和MONARCH-2试验公布的生存数据。使用成本和质量调整生命年(QALY)来计算15年时间范围内的增量成本效益比(ICER)。进行确定性和概率敏感性分析以评估模型结果的稳健性。在基础分析中,模型估计哌柏西利联合氟维司群(PAL+FUL)的健康效益为2.10个QALY,瑞博西尼联合氟维司群(RIB+FUL)为2.55个QALY,阿贝西利联合氟维司群(ABE+FUL)为2.60个QALY,相应成本分别为34423美元、41119美元和48019美元。与PAL+FUL相比,ABE+FUL的ICER为每QALY 27161美元,RIB+FUL为每QALY 15073美元。通过不确定性分析证实了这些发现的稳健性。在这三种策略中,在中国人均国内生产总值3倍(37738美元)的支付意愿(WTP)阈值下,PAL+FUL、RIB+FUL和ABE+FUL最具成本效益的概率分别为0%、99.8%和0.2%。本研究表明,与PAL+FUL相比,在WTP阈值下,RIB+FUL和ABE+FUL均具有成本效益。值得注意的是,在这三种CDK4/6抑制剂中,RIB+FUL在HR+/HER2-ABC/MBC二线治疗中具有最大的成本效益优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ef3/11997058/184ba1812eb6/41598_2025_97504_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验