Neumann Alexander, Sammallahti Sara, Cosin-Tomas Marta, Reese Sarah E, Suderman Matthew, Alemany Silvia, Almqvist Catarina, Andrusaityte Sandra, Arshad Syed H, Bakermans-Kranenburg Marian J, Beilin Lawrence, Breton Carrie, Bustamante Mariona, Czamara Darina, Dabelea Dana, Eng Celeste, Eskenazi Brenda, Fuemmeler Bernard F, Gilliland Frank D, Grazuleviciene Regina, Håberg Siri E, Herberth Gunda, Holland Nina, Hough Amy, Hu Donglei, Huen Karen, Hüls Anke, Jarvelin Marjo-Riitta, Jin Jianping, Julvez Jordi, Koletzko Berthold V, Koppelman Gerard H, Kull Inger, Lu Xueling, Maitre Léa, Mason Dan, Melén Erik, Merid Simon K, Molloy Peter L, Mori Trevor A, Mulder Rosa H, Page Christian M, Richmond Rebecca C, Röder Stefan, Ross Jason P, Schellhas Laura, Sebert Sylvain, Sheppard Dean, Snieder Harold, Starling Anne P, Stein Dan J, Tindula Gwen, van IJzendoorn Marinus H, Vonk Judith, Walton Esther, Witonsky Jonathan, Xu Cheng-Jian, Yang Ivana V, Yousefi Paul D, Zar Heather J, Zenclussen Ana C, Zhang Hongmei, Tiemeier Henning, London Stephanie J, Felix Janine F, Cecil Charlotte
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Genome Med. 2025 Apr 14;17(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13073-025-01451-7.
DNA methylation (DNAm) is a developmentally dynamic epigenetic process; yet, most epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) have examined DNAm at only one timepoint or without systematic comparisons between timepoints. Thus, it is unclear whether DNAm alterations during certain developmental periods are more informative than others for health outcomes, how persistent epigenetic signals are across time, and whether epigenetic timing effects differ by outcome.
We applied longitudinal meta-regression models to published meta-analyses from the PACE consortium that examined DNAm at two timepoints-prospectively at birth and cross-sectionally in childhood-in relation to the same child outcome (ADHD symptoms, general psychopathology, sleep duration, BMI, asthma). These models allowed systematic comparisons of effect sizes and statistical significance between timepoints. Furthermore, we tested correlations between DNAm regression coefficients to assess the consistency of epigenetic signals across time and outcomes. Finally, we performed robustness checks, estimated between-study heterogeneity, and tested pathway enrichment.
Our findings reveal three new insights: (i) across outcomes, DNAm effect sizes are consistently larger in childhood cross-sectional analyses compared to prospective analyses at birth; (ii) higher effect sizes do not necessarily translate into more significant findings, as associations also become noisier in childhood for most outcomes (showing larger standard errors in cross-sectional vs prospective analyses); and (iii) DNAm signals are highly time-specific, while also showing evidence of shared associations across health outcomes (ADHD symptoms, general psychopathology, and asthma). Notably, these observations could not be explained by sample size differences and only partly to differential study-heterogeneity. DNAm sites changing associations were enriched for neural pathways.
Our results highlight developmentally-specific associations between DNAm and child health outcomes, when assessing DNAm at birth vs childhood. This implies that EWAS results from one timepoint are unlikely to generalize to another. Longitudinal studies with repeated epigenetic assessments are direly needed to shed light on the dynamic relationship between DNAm, development and health, as well as to enable the creation of more reliable and generalizable epigenetic biomarkers. More broadly, this study underscores the importance of considering the time-varying nature of DNAm in epigenetic research and supports the potential existence of epigenetic "timing effects" on child health.
DNA甲基化(DNAm)是一个在发育过程中动态变化的表观遗传过程;然而,大多数全表观基因组关联研究(EWAS)仅在一个时间点检测DNAm,或未在各时间点之间进行系统比较。因此,尚不清楚在某些发育时期的DNAm改变对健康结果的信息提供是否比其他时期更多,表观遗传信号随时间的持续性如何,以及表观遗传时间效应是否因结果而异。
我们将纵向meta回归模型应用于PACE联盟已发表的meta分析,这些分析在两个时间点检测DNAm——前瞻性地在出生时以及横断面地在儿童期——与相同的儿童结局(注意缺陷多动障碍症状、一般精神病理学、睡眠时间、体重指数、哮喘)相关。这些模型允许对各时间点之间的效应大小和统计显著性进行系统比较。此外,我们测试了DNAm回归系数之间的相关性,以评估表观遗传信号在时间和结局之间的一致性。最后,我们进行了稳健性检验,估计了研究间的异质性,并测试了通路富集情况。
我们的研究结果揭示了三个新的见解:(i)在所有结局中,与出生时的前瞻性分析相比,儿童期横断面分析中的DNAm效应大小始终更大;(ii)较高的效应大小不一定转化为更显著的结果,因为对于大多数结局而言,儿童期的关联也变得更具噪声(横断面分析与前瞻性分析相比显示出更大的标准误);(iii)DNAm信号具有高度的时间特异性,同时也显示出跨健康结局(注意缺陷多动障碍症状、一般精神病理学和哮喘)存在共同关联的证据。值得注意的是,这些观察结果无法用样本量差异来解释,且仅部分归因于不同的研究异质性。DNAm位点关联变化的神经通路得到了富集。
我们的结果突出了在评估出生时与儿童期的DNAm时,DNAm与儿童健康结局之间发育特异性的关联。这意味着来自一个时间点的EWAS结果不太可能推广到另一个时间点。迫切需要进行重复表观遗传评估的纵向研究,以阐明DNAm、发育和健康之间的动态关系,并能够创建更可靠且可推广的表观遗传生物标志物。更广泛地说,这项研究强调了在表观遗传研究中考虑DNAm随时间变化性质的重要性,并支持表观遗传“时间效应”对儿童健康潜在存在的观点。