Suppr超能文献

二头肌支撑肌腱增强术可改善术后一年的治疗效果。

BicepBrace biceps tendon augmentation improves outcomes one year following surgery.

作者信息

Joaquin Theodore, Bellaire Christopher, Perraut Gregory, Argintar Evan

机构信息

Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, USA.

MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Apr 15;35(1):159. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04285-6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study emphasizes the clinical utility of our newly published "BicepBrace" technique by comparing its preliminary outcomes with standard treatment within the short term follow-up of 12 months following massive rotator cuff repair surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all the rotator cuff repairs by E.H.A. over a two year span was completed under institutional review board approval. Inclusion criteria included all adult patients who received primary massive rotator cuff repair within the time frame of June 15, 2021 and June 15, 2023. Exclusion criteria included non-massive rotator cuff repair, revision surgery, or rotator cuff repairs that were paired with total shoulder arthroplasty. These massive rotator cuff repairs were then evaluated for clinical failure necessitating revision surgery within 12 months of original repair. Statistical analyses were performed using t tests and chi square tests.

RESULTS

In total, 102 rotator cuff repairs were identified within the study timeframe. In total, 24 of these cases met criteria to be labeled as massive tears. In total, 13 of these massive tears were treated by standard technique and 11 of them were treated with our BicepBrace biceps tendon transfer technique. In total, 4 of the patients in the standard technique group were deemed clinical failures necessitating revision surgery (failure rate of 30.8%). Only one of the BicepBrace patients were deemed clinical failures (failure rate of 9.1%).

CONCLUSION

In the setting of a massive rotator cuff tear, the BicepBrace technique-utilizing the long head of the biceps tendon for superior cuff augmentation-may enhance the survivability of the repair within one year of surgery. This relatively new approach offers a promising alternative to standard techniques, particularly for certain patient populations.

摘要

目的

本研究通过在大型肩袖修复手术后12个月的短期随访中,将我们新发表的“二头肌支撑”技术的初步结果与标准治疗方法进行比较,强调其临床实用性。

方法

在机构审查委员会批准下,对E.H.A.在两年时间内进行的所有肩袖修复手术进行了回顾性病历审查。纳入标准包括在2021年6月15日至2023年6月15日期间接受初次大型肩袖修复的所有成年患者。排除标准包括非大型肩袖修复、翻修手术或与全肩关节置换术同时进行的肩袖修复。然后对这些大型肩袖修复进行评估,以确定在初次修复后12个月内是否因临床失败而需要进行翻修手术。使用t检验和卡方检验进行统计分析。

结果

在研究时间范围内,共确定了102例肩袖修复手术。其中,共有24例符合大型撕裂的标准。这些大型撕裂中,共有13例采用标准技术治疗,11例采用我们的二头肌支撑肱二头肌腱转移技术治疗。标准技术组共有4例患者被判定为临床失败,需要进行翻修手术(失败率为30.8%)。二头肌支撑技术组只有1例患者被判定为临床失败(失败率为9.1%)。

结论

在大型肩袖撕裂的情况下,利用肱二头肌长头进行肩袖上方增强的二头肌支撑技术可能会提高手术一年内修复的存活率。这种相对较新的方法为标准技术提供了一个有前景的替代方案,特别是对于某些患者群体。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验