• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放切口负压伤口疗法预防腹部手术手术部位感染的有效性——一项系统评价与Meta分析

Effectiveness of Open Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Surgical Site Infection Prevention for Abdominal Surgery-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Polomska Katarzyna, Kowalik Janina, Kobiela Jarek, Spychalski Piotr

机构信息

Department of Oncological, Transplant and General Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2025 Apr;22(4):e70199. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70199.

DOI:10.1111/iwj.70199
PMID:40234096
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11999733/
Abstract

Open incision negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) combines delayed closure with negative pressure to prevent surgical site infection (SSI). Its effectiveness in preventing SSI remains unclear, complicating its risk-benefit assessment. PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant English studies. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts using the ASReviewer tool. Full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Eight studies were included in the systematic review and five were pooled in the meta-analysis. Data extraction followed the PRISMA guidelines, and the risk of bias was assessed. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model for SSI occurrence. Eight studies (three RCTs and five cohort studies) with 1655 patients were included. Studies were pooled based on control interventions: primary closure (PC) or delayed primary closure (DPC). Pooled odds ratio (OR) estimates favoured NPWT over PC for SSI reduction (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.02-0.87). No significant SSI risk difference was found between the NPWT and DPC groups (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.06-1.27). Preventive NPWT is associated with a reduced risk of SSI in abdominal surgery compared to PC. Our findings indicate that standardising treatment and reporting protocols could improve future evaluations of NPWT effectiveness. Trial Registration: PROSPERO identifier: CRD42024401669.

摘要

开放性切口负压伤口治疗(NPWT)将延迟闭合与负压相结合以预防手术部位感染(SSI)。其预防SSI的有效性尚不清楚,这使其风险效益评估变得复杂。检索了PubMed和Web of Science数据库中的相关英文研究。两名评审员使用ASReviewer工具独立筛选标题和摘要。对全文进行资格评估。八项研究纳入系统评价,五项研究纳入荟萃分析。数据提取遵循PRISMA指南,并评估偏倚风险。使用随机效应模型对SSI发生情况进行荟萃分析。纳入了八项研究(三项随机对照试验和五项队列研究),共1655例患者。根据对照干预措施进行分组:一期缝合(PC)或延迟一期缝合(DPC)。汇总比值比(OR)估计显示,在减少SSI方面,NPWT优于PC(OR,0.15;95%CI,0.02-0.87)。NPWT组和DPC组之间未发现显著的SSI风险差异(OR,0.28;95%CI,0.06-1.27)。与PC相比,预防性NPWT与腹部手术中SSI风险降低相关。我们的研究结果表明,标准化治疗和报告方案可以改善未来对NPWT有效性的评估。试验注册:PROSPERO标识符:CRD42024401669。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f341/11999733/d8358c51ae01/IWJ-22-e70199-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f341/11999733/0bab63daf59c/IWJ-22-e70199-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f341/11999733/d494c6c160f9/IWJ-22-e70199-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f341/11999733/191b1c12b43f/IWJ-22-e70199-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f341/11999733/057413e307ef/IWJ-22-e70199-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f341/11999733/d8358c51ae01/IWJ-22-e70199-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f341/11999733/0bab63daf59c/IWJ-22-e70199-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f341/11999733/d494c6c160f9/IWJ-22-e70199-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f341/11999733/191b1c12b43f/IWJ-22-e70199-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f341/11999733/057413e307ef/IWJ-22-e70199-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f341/11999733/d8358c51ae01/IWJ-22-e70199-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Open Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Surgical Site Infection Prevention for Abdominal Surgery-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.开放切口负压伤口疗法预防腹部手术手术部位感染的有效性——一项系统评价与Meta分析
Int Wound J. 2025 Apr;22(4):e70199. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70199.
2
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.负压伤口疗法在一期缝合手术伤口愈合中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 26;4(4):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub7.
3
Interventions to prevent surgical site infection in adults undergoing cardiac surgery.预防接受心脏手术的成人手术部位感染的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 2;12(12):CD013332. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013332.pub2.
4
Negative pressure wound therapy for open traumatic wounds.开放性创伤伤口的负压伤口治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 3;7(7):CD012522. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012522.pub2.
5
Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy/closed incision management in the prevention of post-surgical wound complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.负压伤口治疗/闭合切口管理在预防术后伤口并发症中的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):253-303. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1687.
6
What is the effectiveness of the negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in patients treated with open abdomen technique? A systematic review and meta-analysis.负压伤口治疗(NPWT)在接受开放腹部技术治疗的患者中的有效性如何?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Sep;81(3):575-84. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001126.
7
Negative pressure wound therapy for skin grafts and surgical wounds healing by primary intention.负压伤口治疗用于一期愈合的皮肤移植和手术伤口。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 7(10):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub3.
8
Negative pressure wound therapy for managing the open abdomen in non-trauma patients.负压伤口疗法在非创伤患者中用于管理开放性腹部。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 6;5(5):CD013710. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013710.pub2.
9
Intracavity lavage and wound irrigation for prevention of surgical site infection.腔内灌洗和伤口冲洗预防手术部位感染
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 30;10(10):CD012234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012234.pub2.
10
Does the Application of Topical Vancomycin Reduce Surgical Site Infections in Spine Surgery? A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.局部万古霉素应用是否能降低脊柱手术部位感染?一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2212-2219. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003179. Epub 2024 Jul 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors Contributing to Surgical Site Infections: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Etiology and Risk Factors.导致手术部位感染的因素:病因和危险因素的全面系统综述
Clin Pract. 2023 Dec 28;14(1):52-68. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14010006.
2
Negative pressure wound therapy for emergency laparotomy incisions: A national database propensity matched study.急诊剖腹手术切口负压伤口治疗:一项全国数据库倾向匹配研究。
Am J Surg. 2024 Feb;228:287-294. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.055. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
3
The Automated Systematic Search Deduplicator (ASySD): a rapid, open-source, interoperable tool to remove duplicate citations in biomedical systematic reviews.
自动化系统搜索去重器 (ASySD):一种快速、开源、可互操作的工具,用于去除生物医学系统评价中的重复引文。
BMC Biol. 2023 Sep 7;21(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12915-023-01686-z.
4
Incisional negative pressure wound therapy for the prevention of surgical site infection: an up-to-date meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.切口负压伤口治疗预防手术部位感染:最新的荟萃分析和试验序贯分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Jul 24;62:102105. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102105. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used.系统评价中的人工智能:恰当使用时前景广阔。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 7;13(7):e072254. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072254.
6
Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Wound Classification is Prognostic of 30-Day Readmission Following Surgery.疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的伤口分类对手术后 30 天再入院具有预后价值。
World J Surg. 2023 Oct;47(10):2392-2400. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07093-3. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
7
Negative pressure wound therapy versus standard care for incisional laparotomy subcutaneous wounds in gastrointestinal perforations: A randomized controlled study.负压伤口疗法与标准护理治疗胃肠道穿孔切口皮下伤口的随机对照研究。
Surgery. 2023 Aug;174(2):291-295. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.04.018. Epub 2023 May 12.
8
Prophylactic effect of negative-pressure wound therapy and delayed sutures against incisional-surgical site infection after emergency laparotomy for colorectal perforation: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.负压伤口治疗和延迟缝合对结直肠穿孔急诊剖腹手术后切口手术部位感染的预防作用:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022 Nov 27;7(3):441-449. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12643. eCollection 2023 May.
9
Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Delayed Primary Closure for Contaminated Abdominal Wounds.预防性负压伤口治疗联合二期缝合对污染性腹部伤口的疗效
Surg Res Pract. 2022 Nov 14;2022:6767570. doi: 10.1155/2022/6767570. eCollection 2022.
10
The impact of surgical site infection-a cost analysis.手术部位感染的影响——成本分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Mar;407(2):819-828. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02346-y. Epub 2021 Oct 14.