Huang Qinguo, Ye Junhua, Wu Yanyu, Zhou Qiang, Li Hong, Peng Lin, Lu Yuntao
Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Department of Neurosurgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Neurospine. 2025 Jun;22(2):500-513. doi: 10.14245/ns.2449314.657. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
Our previous study categorized atlanto-occipital joint (AOJ) morphology into 3 types, with types II and III-AOJ associated with Chiari malformation (CM) with and without type II basilar invagination (II-BI), respectively. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of tailoring surgical strategies for patients with CM based on AOJ morphological types.
We retrospectively studied 212 CM patients who underwent foramen magnum decompression (FMD) or combined occipitocervical fusion (OCF). Patients were divided into 4 groups: (1) pure CM with II-AOJ who underwent FMD (CM-II-FMD); (2) pure CM with III-AOJ who underwent FMD+OCF (CM-III-OCF); (3) CM-III-FMD; and (4) CM+ II-BI with III-AOJ who underwent FMD+OCF (BI-III-OCF). Clinical data, including manifestations, imaging findings, surgical details, and neurological assessments, were analyzed at the final follow-up to assess surgical efficacy.
Patients in the BI-III-OCF, CM-III-OCF, and CM-II-FMD groups exhibited a significant improvement in clinical symptoms (pain, sensory disturbances, motor weakness, gait ataxia, and bladder and bowel dysfunction) compared to preoperative levels (p<0.05). Results from the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale and Neck Disability Index indicated a significant reduction in the degree of neurological impairment within these groups (p<0.05). Furthermore, the Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale scores indicated superior surgical outcomes for patients in these groups. Imaging analyses demonstrated significant reductions in the syringomyelic segment, syringomyelia width, and tonsillar herniation distance among these patients (p<0.05). However, the CM-III-FMD group did not significantly improve in these areas (p>0.05). Postoperative complications occurred in 4.3% of FMD+OCF patients and 3.3% of FMD-only patients.
AOJ morphological types can guide surgical treatment strategies for CM with or without II-BI. FMD alone is suitable for II-AOJ cases, whereas III-AOJ cases should be treated with FMD combined with OCF.
我们之前的研究将寰枕关节(AOJ)形态分为3种类型,其中II型和III型AOJ分别与伴有或不伴有II型基底凹陷(II-BI)的Chiari畸形(CM)相关。本研究旨在评估根据AOJ形态类型为CM患者量身定制手术策略的可行性。
我们回顾性研究了212例行枕骨大孔减压术(FMD)或枕颈联合融合术(OCF)的CM患者。患者分为4组:(1)伴有II型AOJ的单纯CM患者,接受FMD(CM-II-FMD);(2)伴有III型AOJ的单纯CM患者,接受FMD+OCF(CM-III-OCF);(3)CM-III-FMD;(4)伴有III型AOJ的CM+II-BI患者,接受FMD+OCF(BI-III-OCF)。在末次随访时分析临床数据,包括临床表现、影像学检查结果、手术细节和神经功能评估,以评估手术疗效。
与术前水平相比,BI-III-OCF、CM-III-OCF和CM-II-FMD组患者的临床症状(疼痛、感觉障碍、运动无力、步态共济失调以及膀胱和肠道功能障碍)有显著改善(p<0.05)。日本骨科协会评分和颈部功能障碍指数结果表明,这些组内神经功能损害程度显著降低(p<0.05)。此外,芝加哥Chiari疗效量表评分表明这些组患者的手术效果更佳。影像学分析显示,这些患者的脊髓空洞节段、脊髓空洞宽度和扁桃体疝出距离显著减小(p<0.05)。然而,CM-III-FMD组在这些方面没有显著改善(p>0.05)。FMD+OCF患者术后并发症发生率为4.3%,单纯FMD患者为3.3%。
AOJ形态类型可指导有或无II-BI的CM的手术治疗策略。单纯FMD适用于II型AOJ病例,而III型AOJ病例应采用FMD联合OCF治疗。