Suppr超能文献

间隙平衡技术真的能在全膝关节置换术中提高关节线吗?一项单中心随机研究。

Does the gap balance technique really elevate the joint line in total knee arthroplasty? A single-center, randomized study.

作者信息

Avci Özgür, Öztürk Alpaslan, Akalın Yavuz, Çevik Nazan, Çınar Ali, Şahin Hikmet

机构信息

Özgür Avci, MD. Tavşanlı Devlet Hastanesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kliniği, 43300 Tavşanlı, Kütahya, Türkiye.

出版信息

Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2025 Apr 5;36(2):350-357. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2025.2068.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with gap balancing (GB) versus measured resection (MR) techniques in terms of joint line (JL) using radiographic measurements from both femoral and tibial sides.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between August 2019 and May 2021, a total of 107 patients who underwent TKA were included in this randomized study. The patients were divided into two groups as the GB group (n=54; 9 males, 45 females; mean age: 66.6±7.4 years; range, 51 to 81 years) and the MR group (n=53; 10 males, 43 females; mean age: 64.0±6.8 years; range, 50 to 80 years). The adductor tubercle joint line (ATJL) and the tibial tubercle joint line (TTJL) were evaluated for JL measurement. Clinical and functional evaluation was made using the range of motion of the joint, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, Knee Society Score (KSS)-Knee and Functional scores.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 34.2±3.5 months in the GB group and 34.4±3.3 months in the MR group (p=0.80). The mean operation time was 119.1±14.9 min in the GB group and 118.6±17.5 min in the MR group (p=0.89). A total of 31 (57.4%) patients in the GB group had a degree of release of 3-4, while 21 (39.6%) patients in the MR group had a degree of release of 3-4 (p=0.26). The ATJL measurement was similar in the GB and MR groups, while the TTJL measurement was significantly different between the two groups (p=0.01). There was no significant correlation between the ATJL measurement and the degree of release, while there was a significant correlation between the TTJL and the degree of release (r=0.731, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

While ATJL measurements in TKA showed similar results with GB and MR techniques, the amount of release may have caused the significantly higher JL elevation in the GB group in TTJL measurements. Based on these findings, we suggest that radiographic JL measurements on both the tibial and femoral sides in TKA may provide a more accurate assessment and we recommend to measure JL from the femoral side.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过对股骨和胫骨两侧的影像学测量,比较采用间隙平衡(GB)技术与测量截骨(MR)技术进行全膝关节置换术(TKA)的患者在关节线(JL)方面的差异。

患者与方法

在2019年8月至2021年5月期间,共有107例行TKA的患者纳入本随机研究。患者被分为两组,即GB组(n = 54;男性9例,女性45例;平均年龄:66.6±7.4岁;范围51至81岁)和MR组(n = 53;男性10例,女性43例;平均年龄:64.0±6.8岁;范围50至80岁)。评估内收肌结节关节线(ATJL)和胫骨结节关节线(TTJL)以测量JL。使用关节活动范围、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分、膝关节协会评分(KSS)-膝关节和功能评分进行临床和功能评估。

结果

GB组平均随访时间为34.2±3.5个月,MR组为34.4±3.3个月(p = 0.80)。GB组平均手术时间为119.1±14.9分钟,MR组为118.6±17.5分钟(p = 0.89)。GB组共有31例(57.4%)患者的松解程度为3 - 4级,而MR组有21例(39.6%)患者的松解程度为3 - 4级(p = 0.26)。GB组和MR组的ATJL测量结果相似,而两组之间的TTJL测量结果有显著差异(p = 0.01)。ATJL测量与松解程度之间无显著相关性,而TTJL与松解程度之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.731,p < 0.001)。

结论

虽然TKA中ATJL测量在GB和MR技术下显示出相似结果,但松解量可能导致GB组在TTJL测量中关节线升高明显更高。基于这些发现,我们建议在TKA中对股骨和胫骨两侧进行影像学JL测量可能会提供更准确的评估,并且我们建议从股骨侧测量JL。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0bd/12086496/b875900e3bbf/JDRS-2025-36-2-350-357-F1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验