Suppr超能文献

日本放射肿瘤学会高精度外照射放疗组于2023年开展的一项关于调强放疗/立体定向体部放疗的全国性调查。

A Japanese national survey on IMRT/SBRT in 2023 by the JASTRO High-Precision External Beam Radiotherapy Group.

作者信息

Saito Masahide, Ozawa Shuichi, Komiyama Takafumi, Kokubo Masaki, Shioyama Yoshiyuki, Matsuo Yukinori, Mizowaki Takashi, Kimura Tomoki, Harada Hideyuki, Igaki Hiroshi, Tohyama Naoki, Kurooka Masahiko, Nakamura Mitsuhiro, Kumazaki Yu, Suzuki Hidekazu, Nemoto Hikaru, Yasushi Nagata, Onishi Hiroshi

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo-city, Yamanashi, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan.

Division of Medical Physics, Hiroshima High-Precision Radiotherapy Cancer Center, 3-2-2, Futabanosato, Higashiku, Hiroshima, Hiroshima 732-0057, Japan.

出版信息

J Radiat Res. 2025 May 23;66(3):234-252. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rraf009.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the utilization and implementation of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in Japan up to 2023. The survey was conducted by the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology High-Precision External Beam Radiotherapy Group Subcommittee from December 2023 to February 2024. The study targeted patients treated with IMRT or SBRT between January 2021 and December 2022. A comprehensive web-based questionnaire was distributed to 880 facilities, with separate sections for radiation oncologists and medical physicists/radiotherapy technologists. A total of 360 facilities responded (response rate: 40.9%) for the section of radiation oncologists, and 405 facilities responded (response rate: 46.0%) for medical physicists/radiotherapy technologists, providing data on the implementation status, techniques, workload and challenges associated with IMRT and SBRT. Based on the responses in the section of radiation oncologists, IMRT was used in 68.6% of responding institutes, and SBRT in 87.8%. VMAT emerged as the most common IMRT technique (78.3%). The survey highlighted a high demand for medical physicists to perform IMRT (86.9%). Based on the responses in the section of medical physicists/radiotherapy technologists, 84.6% of the facilities that have not performed IMRT reported that the main reason was a lack of radiation oncologists. Furthermore, the survey also noted significant variations in prescribed doses and margin sizes across facilities, indicating the need for further standardization. High-precision radiation techniques such as IMRT and SBRT are getting popular, however, the facility requirements which mandate the presence of at least two radiation oncologists prevents IMRT from becoming more widespread in Japan.

摘要

本研究旨在调查截至2023年日本立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)和调强放射治疗(IMRT)的使用及实施情况。该调查由日本放射肿瘤学会高精度外照射放射治疗组小组委员会于2023年12月至2024年2月进行。研究对象为2021年1月至2022年12月期间接受IMRT或SBRT治疗的患者。一份基于网络的综合问卷被分发给880家机构,问卷针对放射肿瘤学家以及医学物理师/放射治疗技师设置了不同部分。放射肿瘤学家部分共有360家机构回复(回复率:40.9%),医学物理师/放射治疗技师部分有405家机构回复(回复率:46.0%),提供了与IMRT和SBRT的实施状况、技术、工作量及挑战相关的数据。根据放射肿瘤学家部分的回复,68.6%的回复机构使用IMRT,87.8%使用SBRT。容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)成为最常用的IMRT技术(78.3%)。调查凸显了对医学物理师进行IMRT的高需求(86.9%)。根据医学物理师/放射治疗技师部分的回复,84.6%未开展IMRT的机构报告主要原因是缺乏放射肿瘤学家。此外,调查还指出各机构之间在处方剂量和边界大小方面存在显著差异,表明需要进一步标准化。IMRT和SBRT等高精放射技术正变得越来越普及,然而,要求至少有两名放射肿瘤学家在场的机构要求阻碍了IMRT在日本更广泛地应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e92/12100480/07fce4dec9f4/rraf009f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验