Čuš Franc, Krebelj Anastazija Jež, Potisek Mateja
Department of Fruit Growing, Viticulture, and Oenology, Agricultural Institute of Slovenia, Hacquetova ulica 17, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Foods. 2025 Mar 22;14(7):1101. doi: 10.3390/foods14071101.
The influence of the vineyard location, the yield per vine and the type of alcoholic fermentation on the composition of Merlot wine from two consecutive vintages was investigated in a simultaneous experiment. Grapes from two locations and two crop loads per vine, from controlled and thinned vines, were vinified. At the same time, grapes from control vines were vinified with inoculated and spontaneous alcoholic fermentation. Comparisons of the wine composition were made using a targeted metabolomic approach, microbiological analysis and sensory evaluation. It has been confirmed that the composition of Merlot wine is essentially determined by the location of the vineyard. The analytical marker used to distinguish the two locations was the content of 3-mercaptohexan-1-ol (significantly higher in location B with 38-130%). It has also been shown that the type of alcoholic fermentation has a greater influence on the composition of the wine than the crop load. The analytical marker used for the cluster thinning was the pH of the wine, which increased significantly by 0.03 to 0.08 units with the lower crop load, and for the type of alcoholic fermentation, the concentration of 2-phenethyl acetate, which relates to the sum of acetates and 2-phenylethanol, which increased significantly by 58-299%, 54-218%, and 24-46% in the spontaneously fermented wines. Both the location of the vineyard and spontaneous alcoholic fermentation influenced the significant differences in the sensory characteristics of the wine, while cluster thinning had no such influence. The other influences of the two technical factors on the wine composition depended on the location of the vineyard and the vintage. It can also be concluded that spontaneous alcoholic fermentation reduced the influence of the vintage on the wine composition, while the opposite was the case with cluster thinning.
在一项同步实验中,研究了葡萄园位置、每株葡萄产量以及酒精发酵类型对两个连续年份梅洛葡萄酒成分的影响。对来自两个位置、每株葡萄有两种作物负载量(分别来自控制 vines 和疏果 vines)的葡萄进行了酿酒。同时,对来自控制 vines 的葡萄分别进行接种和自然酒精发酵酿酒。使用靶向代谢组学方法、微生物分析和感官评价对葡萄酒成分进行了比较。已证实梅洛葡萄酒的成分主要由葡萄园位置决定。用于区分两个位置的分析标志物是 3 - 巯基己醇的含量(在位置 B 显著更高,高出 38 - 130%)。还表明酒精发酵类型对葡萄酒成分的影响大于作物负载量。用于区分疏果的分析标志物是葡萄酒的 pH 值,较低作物负载量时 pH 值显著升高 0.03 至 0.08 个单位,对于酒精发酵类型,2 - 苯乙基乙酸的浓度与乙酸总和以及 2 - 苯乙醇有关,在自然发酵的葡萄酒中分别显著增加 58 - 299%、54 - 218%和 24 - 46%。葡萄园位置和自然酒精发酵都影响了葡萄酒感官特征的显著差异,而疏果则没有这种影响。这两个技术因素对葡萄酒成分的其他影响取决于葡萄园位置和年份。还可以得出结论,自然酒精发酵降低了年份对葡萄酒成分的影响,而疏果则相反。