Matsushita Felipe Yu, Krebs Vera Lúcia Jornada, de Carvalho Werther Brunow
Department of Pediatrics, Neonatology Division, Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo, Instituto da Criança, São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo, Instituto Do Coração, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Apr 16;184(5):300. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06130-8.
While pharmacological interventions promote PDA closure, their impact on overall outcomes remains uncertain due to conflicting results. These inconsistent results indicate that the effectiveness of these treatments may vary considerably among preterm infants, suggesting potential heterogeneity. This meta-analysis and meta-regression aimed to assess the effect of pharmacological interventions on mortality and PDA closure in preterm infants, while critically examining sources of heterogeneity. We searched Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE for relevant studies. Studies comparing ibuprofen, acetaminophen, indomethacin, or placebo/expectant management in preterm infants with PDA, where the outcome of interest was either mortality or PDA closure. We extracted data on mortality, PDA closure, study design, and patient baseline characteristics following PRISMA guidelines. We used a random-effects model to account for the heterogeneity observed in the studies. Meta-analysis of 72 RCTs revealed that while interventions significantly improved PDA closure rates (OR 5.31, p < 0.00001), they did not consistently reduce mortality (OR 1.03, p = 0.84). Notably, interventions appeared to increase mortality in infants with hemodynamically significant PDA (OR 1.45, p = 0.05). Our analysis revealed substantial heterogeneity (I = 55%) and significant inconsistencies in outcome reporting across studies. Meta-regression models could not fully explain the observed variability. Potential publication bias, incomplete patient-level data, and inconsistent definitions across studies.
The substantial heterogeneity underscores the complexity of PDA and the limitations of a one-size-fits-all approach. These findings strongly support a shift toward precision medicine in PDA treatment, focusing on identifying factors that predict individual response.
• Pharmacological treatments for PDA increase closure rates but have not consistently improved survival in preterm infants. • Previous studies and meta-analyses have reported conflicting outcomes, likely driven by differences in patient characteristics and trial design.
• This study demonstrates persistent and substantial heterogeneity in both PDA closure and mortality outcomes, even after extensive stratification and meta-regression. • The findings expose the limitations of a one-size-fits all approach and support a shift toward phenotype-driven, precision medicine in PDA management.
虽然药物干预可促进动脉导管未闭(PDA)闭合,但由于结果相互矛盾,其对总体结局的影响仍不确定。这些不一致的结果表明,这些治疗方法的有效性在早产儿中可能有很大差异,提示存在潜在的异质性。这项荟萃分析和荟萃回归旨在评估药物干预对早产儿死亡率和PDA闭合的影响,同时严格审查异质性来源。我们在Ovid MEDLINE和EMBASE中检索了相关研究。研究比较了布洛芬、对乙酰氨基酚、吲哚美辛或安慰剂/期待治疗在患有PDA的早产儿中的效果,其中感兴趣的结局为死亡率或PDA闭合。我们按照PRISMA指南提取了关于死亡率、PDA闭合、研究设计和患者基线特征的数据。我们使用随机效应模型来处理研究中观察到的异质性。对72项随机对照试验的荟萃分析显示,虽然干预措施显著提高了PDA闭合率(比值比5.31,p < 0.00001),但它们并未持续降低死亡率(比值比1.03,p = 0.84)。值得注意的是,干预措施似乎增加了血流动力学显著PDA婴儿的死亡率(比值比1.45,p = 0.05)。我们的分析揭示了研究间存在大量异质性(I² = 55%)以及结局报告方面的显著不一致。荟萃回归模型无法完全解释观察到的变异性。潜在的发表偏倚、不完整的患者层面数据以及研究间定义不一致。
大量异质性凸显了PDA的复杂性以及一刀切方法的局限性。这些发现有力支持在PDA治疗中转向精准医学,重点是识别预测个体反应的因素。
• PDA的药物治疗可提高闭合率,但并未持续改善早产儿的生存率。• 既往研究和荟萃分析报告的结果相互矛盾,可能是由患者特征和试验设计的差异所致。
• 本研究表明,即使经过广泛分层和荟萃回归,PDA闭合和死亡率结局仍存在持续且大量的异质性。• 这些发现揭示了一刀切方法的局限性,并支持在PDA管理中转向表型驱动的精准医学。