Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Departments of Pediatrics, Community Health & Epidemiology, Dalhousie University & IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Canada.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 15;12:CD010061. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010061.pub5.
The different management strategies for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants are expectant management, surgery, or medical treatment with non-selective cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have suggested that paracetamol may be an effective and safe agent for the closure of a PDA.
To determine the efficacy and safety of paracetamol as monotherapy or as part of combination therapy via any route of administration, compared with placebo, no intervention, or another prostaglandin inhibitor, for prophylaxis or treatment of an echocardiographically-diagnosed PDA in preterm or low birth weight infants.
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and three trials registers on 13 October 2021, and one other database on 1 March 2022. We also checked references and contacted study authors to identify additional studies.
We included RCTs and quasi-RCTs in which paracetamol (single-agent or combination therapy) was compared to no intervention, placebo, or other agents used for closure of PDA, irrespective of dose, duration, and mode of administration in preterm infants. Two independent authors reviewed the search results and made a final selection of potentially eligible articles through discussion.
We performed data collection and analyses in accordance with the methods of Cochrane Neonatal. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence for the following outcomes: failure of ductal closure after the first course of treatment; all-cause mortality during initial hospital stay; and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).
For this update, we included 27 studies enrolling 2278 infants. We considered the overall risk of bias in the 27 studies to vary from low to unclear. We identified 24 ongoing studies. Paracetamol versus ibuprofen There was probably little to no difference between paracetamol and ibuprofen for failure of ductal closure after the first course (risk ratio (RR) 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 1.18; 18 studies, 1535 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). There was likely little to no difference between paracetamol and ibuprofen for all-cause mortality during hospital stay (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.48; 8 studies, 734 infants; moderate-certainty evidence), and for NEC (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.94; 10 studies, 1015 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). Paracetamol versus indomethacin There was little to no difference between paracetamol and indomethacin for failure of ductal closure after the first course (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.33; 4 studies, 380 infants; low-certainty evidence). There was little to no difference between paracetamol and indomethacin for all-cause mortality during hospital stay (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.92; 2 studies, 114 infants; low-certainty evidence). The rate of NEC may be lower in the paracetamol group (3.7%) versus the indomethacin group(9.2%) (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.96; 4 studies, 384 infants; low-certainty evidence). Prophylactic paracetamol versus placebo/no intervention Prophylactic paracetamol (17%) compared to placebo/no intervention (61%) may reduce failure of ductal closure after one course (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.42; 3 studies, 240 infants; low-certainty evidence). There was little to no difference between prophylactic paracetamol and placebo/no intervention for all-cause mortality during hospital stay (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.44; 3 studies, 240 infants; low-certainty evidence). No studies reported on NEC. Early paracetamol treatment versus placebo/no intervention Early paracetamol treatment (28%) compared to placebo/no intervention (79%) may reduce failure of ductal closure after one course when used before 14 days' postnatal age (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.53; 2 studies, 127 infants; low-certainty evidence). No studies reported on all-cause mortality during hospital stay or NEC. Late paracetamol treatment versus placebo/no intervention There was little to no difference between late paracetamol and placebo for failure of ductal closure after one course of treatment when used at or after 14 days' postnatal age (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.01; 1 study, 55 infants; low-certainty evidence) or NEC (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.07 to 15.76; 1 study, 55 infants; low-certainty evidence). No data were reported for all-cause mortality during hospital stay. Paracetamol combined with ibuprofen versus ibuprofen combined with placebo or no intervention There was little to no difference between paracetamol plus ibuprofen compared to ibuprofen plus placebo or no intervention for failure of ductal closure after the first course (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.36; 2 studies, 111 infants; low-certainty evidence). There was little to no difference between paracetamol plus ibuprofen compared to ibuprofen plus placebo or no intervention for NEC (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.45; 1 study, 24 infants; low-certainty evidence). No data were reported for all-cause mortality during hospital stay. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-certainty evidence suggests that there is probably little or no difference in effectiveness between paracetamol and ibuprofen; low-certainty evidence suggests that there is probably little or no difference in effectiveness between paracetamol and indomethacin; low-certainty evidence suggests that prophylactic paracetamol may be more effective than placebo/no intervention; low-certainty evidence suggests that early paracetamol treatment may be more effective than placebo/no intervention; low-certainty evidence suggests that there is probably little or no difference between late paracetamol treatment and placebo, and probably little or no difference in effectiveness between the combination of paracetamol plus ibuprofen versus ibuprofen alone for the closure of PDA after the first course of treatment. The majority of neonates included in these studies were of moderate preterm gestation. Thus, establishing the efficacy and safety of paracetamol for PDA treatment in extremely low birth weight (ELBW: birth weight < 1000 grams) and extremely low gestational age neonates (ELGANs < 28 weeks' gestation) requires further studies.
不同的管理策略对动脉导管未闭(PDA)早产儿,期待治疗、手术或使用非选择性环氧化酶抑制剂的医学治疗。随机对照试验(RCTs)表明,对乙酰氨基酚可能是一种有效且安全的药物,可用于闭合早产儿或低出生体重儿的 PDA。
确定在预防或治疗超声诊断的 PDA 方面,与安慰剂、无干预或其他前列腺素抑制剂相比,单药或联合治疗途径(无论剂量、持续时间和方式如何)的对乙酰氨基酚作为单一疗法或联合疗法的疗效和安全性。
我们于 2021 年 10 月 13 日检索了 CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase 和三个试验登记处,并于 2022 年 3 月 1 日检索了另一个数据库,还查阅了参考文献并联系了研究作者以确定其他研究。
我们纳入了 RCTs 和准 RCTs,其中对乙酰氨基酚(单药或联合治疗)与无干预、安慰剂或其他用于闭合 PDA 的药物进行了比较,无论剂量、持续时间和给药途径如何,在早产儿中。两名独立的作者通过讨论对检索结果进行了最终选择。
我们按照 Cochrane 新生儿的方法进行了数据收集和分析。我们使用 GRADE 方法评估了以下结局的证据确定性:第一次疗程后导管关闭失败;初始住院期间的全因死亡率;以及坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)。
对于本次更新,我们纳入了 27 项研究,共纳入 2278 名婴儿。我们认为 27 项研究的整体偏倚风险从低到不确定不等。我们确定了 24 项正在进行的研究。对乙酰氨基酚与布洛芬:在第一次疗程后导管关闭失败方面,对乙酰氨基酚与布洛芬可能没有差异(RR 1.02,95%CI 0.88 至 1.18;18 项研究,1535 名婴儿;中等确定性证据)。在住院期间的全因死亡率方面,对乙酰氨基酚与布洛芬可能没有差异(RR 1.09,95%CI 0.80 至 1.48;8 项研究,734 名婴儿;中等确定性证据),以及 NEC(RR 1.30,95%CI 0.87 至 1.94;10 项研究,1015 名婴儿;中等确定性证据)。对乙酰氨基酚与吲哚美辛:在第一次疗程后导管关闭失败方面,对乙酰氨基酚与吲哚美辛可能没有差异(RR 1.02,95%CI 0.78 至 1.33;4 项研究,380 名婴儿;低确定性证据)。在住院期间的全因死亡率方面,对乙酰氨基酚与吲哚美辛可能没有差异(RR 0.86,95%CI 0.39 至 1.92;2 项研究,114 名婴儿;低确定性证据)。NEC 的发生率可能较低(3.7%)与吲哚美辛组(9.2%)(RR 0.42,95%CI 0.19 至 0.96;4 项研究,384 名婴儿;低确定性证据)。预防性对乙酰氨基酚与安慰剂/无干预:与安慰剂/无干预(61%)相比,预防性对乙酰氨基酚(17%)可能降低一次疗程后的导管关闭失败(RR 0.27,95%CI 0.18 至 0.42;3 项研究,240 名婴儿;低确定性证据)。在住院期间的全因死亡率方面,预防性对乙酰氨基酚与安慰剂/无干预可能没有差异(RR 0.59,95%CI 0.24 至 1.44;3 项研究,240 名婴儿;低确定性证据)。没有研究报告 NEC。早期对乙酰氨基酚治疗与安慰剂/无干预:与安慰剂/无干预(79%)相比,在 14 天龄之前使用(RR 0.35,95%CI 0.23 至 0.53;2 项研究,127 名婴儿;低确定性证据)可能降低一次疗程后的导管关闭失败。没有研究报告住院期间的全因死亡率或 NEC。晚期对乙酰氨基酚治疗与安慰剂/无干预:与安慰剂/无干预相比,在 14 天龄或之后使用(RR 0.85,95%CI 0.72 至 1.01;1 项研究,55 名婴儿;低确定性证据)或 NEC(RR 1.04,95%CI 0.07 至 15.76;1 项研究,55 名婴儿;低确定性证据)时,对乙酰氨基酚的晚期治疗与安慰剂没有差异。没有报告住院期间全因死亡率的数据。对乙酰氨基酚联合布洛芬与布洛芬联合安慰剂或无干预:与布洛芬联合安慰剂或无干预相比,对乙酰氨基酚联合布洛芬在第一次疗程后导管关闭失败方面可能没有差异(RR 0.77,95%CI 0.43 至 1.36;2 项研究,111 名婴儿;低确定性证据)。在 NEC(RR 0.33,95%CI 0.01 至 7.45;1 项研究,24 名婴儿;低确定性证据)方面,对乙酰氨基酚联合布洛芬与布洛芬联合安慰剂或无干预可能没有差异。没有报告住院期间的全因死亡率数据。
中等确定性证据表明,对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬之间的有效性可能没有差异;低确定性证据表明,对乙酰氨基酚和吲哚美辛之间的有效性可能没有差异;低确定性证据表明,预防性对乙酰氨基酚可能比安慰剂/无干预更有效;低确定性证据表明,早期对乙酰氨基酚治疗可能比安慰剂/无干预更有效;低确定性证据表明,晚期对乙酰氨基酚治疗与安慰剂之间可能没有差异,对乙酰氨基酚联合布洛芬与布洛芬单药治疗在第一次疗程后关闭 PDA 的效果可能没有差异。纳入这些研究的大多数新生儿为中度早产儿。因此,需要进一步的研究来确定对乙酰氨基酚治疗 PDA 在极低出生体重儿(出生体重<1000 克)和极早早产儿(<28 周妊娠)中的疗效和安全性。