You Jialu, Liu Xi, Yang Jing, Zhang Liyuan, Zhang Le, Wang Quan
Department of Ophthalmology, Xi'an Aier Ancient City Eye Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Key Laboratory of Spectral Imaging Technology, Xi'an, Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an, China.
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Apr 16;184(5):301. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06114-8.
By utilizing eye-tracking data, this study aims to evaluate the impact of both mild and moderate myopia and different refractive correction methods on certain types of attention of school-age children.
In this prospective case-control study, data was collected from 90 children aged 8 to 10 years old. Participants were classified into three groups based on their spherical lens: mild myopia group (SE: ≤ - 0.50D and > - 3.00D), moderate myopia group (SE: ≤ - 3.00D and > - 6.00D), and control group (SE: ≤ + 0.50D and > - 0.50D). Additionally, children with myopia were subdivided into three subgroups based on refractive correction methods: the uncorrected group, the spectacles corrected group, and the orthokeratology lenses group. The eye-tracking system was used to record and compare attention assessment metrics, including saccade latency, total search time, and saccade accuracy. To enhance result reproducibility, MoCA scale scores were used as a control method to measure attention.
When categorized by refraction, MoCA scale scores were lower in the moderate myopia group compared to the control group (p = 0.011). Saccade latency and total search time were slower in both the mild and moderate myopia groups compared to the control group (p < 0.001). A weak positive correlation was observed between spherical lens and total search time (r = 0.260, p = 0.045). When grouped according to correction method, statistically significant differences in saccade latency were evident across all groups (all p < 0.001); the uncorrected group had the longest latency, whereas the orthokeratology lenses group had the shortest. The orthokeratology lenses group exhibited a shorter total search time compared to the uncorrected group (p = 0.018).
Affected by myopia, impairments and deficits in attention may occur in school-age children and worsen with the progression of myopia. These cognitive dysfunction can be alleviated by timely refractive correction during the plastic cognitive stage. Compared to the spectacles corrected group, the orthokeratology lenses group showed greater improvement in attention among myopic children.
• Myopia can affect people's cognition, function, emotions, and so on.
• We cites eye-movement indicators to quantify the impact of myopia on attention. • Most people study myopic adults, but we selects school-age children whose cognition is in the plasticity period.
本研究通过利用眼动追踪数据,旨在评估轻度和中度近视以及不同屈光矫正方法对学龄儿童特定类型注意力的影响。
在这项前瞻性病例对照研究中,收集了90名8至10岁儿童的数据。参与者根据其球镜度数分为三组:轻度近视组(等效球镜度数:≤ - 0.50D且> - 3.00D)、中度近视组(等效球镜度数:≤ - 3.00D且> - 6.00D)和对照组(等效球镜度数:≤ + 0.50D且> - 0.50D)。此外,近视儿童根据屈光矫正方法又细分为三个亚组:未矫正组、眼镜矫正组和角膜塑形镜组。使用眼动追踪系统记录并比较注意力评估指标,包括扫视潜伏期、总搜索时间和扫视准确性。为提高结果的可重复性,使用蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)评分作为测量注意力的对照方法。
按屈光分类时,中度近视组的MoCA量表评分低于对照组(p = 0.011)。与对照组相比,轻度和中度近视组的扫视潜伏期和总搜索时间均较慢(p < 0.001)。球镜度数与总搜索时间之间存在弱正相关(r = 0.260,p = 0.045)。按矫正方法分组时,所有组的扫视潜伏期均存在统计学显著差异(所有p < 0.001);未矫正组的潜伏期最长,而角膜塑形镜组的潜伏期最短。与未矫正组相比,角膜塑形镜组的总搜索时间更短(p = 0.018)。
受近视影响,学龄儿童可能会出现注意力受损和缺陷,且随着近视进展而加重。在认知可塑性阶段及时进行屈光矫正可缓解这些认知功能障碍。与眼镜矫正组相比,角膜塑形镜组在近视儿童的注意力改善方面表现更佳。
• 近视会影响人的认知、功能、情绪等。
• 我们引用眼动指标来量化近视对注意力的影响。• 大多数人研究的是近视成年人,但我们选择的是认知处于可塑性时期的学龄儿童。