• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

总体分布成本效益分析:一种用于卫生经济评估以指导资源分配的新工具。

Aggregate distributional cost-effectiveness analysis: a novel tool for health economic evaluation to inform resource allocation.

作者信息

Jiang Shan, Li Boyang, Parkinson Bonny, Li Shunping, Gu Yuanyuan

机构信息

Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie Business School and Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

School of Political Science and Public Administration, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

出版信息

Glob Health Res Policy. 2025 Apr 16;10(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s41256-025-00415-z.

DOI:10.1186/s41256-025-00415-z
PMID:40241192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12001684/
Abstract

Health equity is a growing concern for policymakers across the globe. Conventional cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), commonly used in evaluating health interventions, primarily focuses on the average and aggregate health outcomes in the targeted population, neglecting the distributional impacts on health equity. This gap calls for approaches that can quantify the impact of intervention of interest on health equity to support decision-making. Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (DCEA) offers a framework to assess the distributional impacts of health interventions. Based on DCEA, aggregate DCEA (A-DCEA) was proposed as a practical and simplified alternative to DCEA. Unlike full DCEA, which requires detailed subgroup data, A-DCEA utilizes aggregated data, making it accessible and feasible for broader use. In this commentary, we discuss the rationale for A-DCEA, outline the steps for its implementation, and highlight its applicability. The purpose of this article is to introduce A-DCEA as a pragmatic and accessible tool for evaluating the equity implications of healthcare interventions. A-DCEA can inform policymakers by incorporating equity considerations into healthcare decision-making, particularly when conducting a full DCEA is impractical due to data limitation. A-DCEA provides a valuable and accessible method for evaluating the distributional impact of interventions, promoting health equity in decision-making. Its adoption can lead to more informed health policy that considers health inequities as well as the efficient use of resources.

摘要

健康公平性日益受到全球政策制定者的关注。传统的成本效益分析(CEA)常用于评估健康干预措施,主要关注目标人群的平均和总体健康结果,而忽视了对健康公平性的分布影响。这一差距需要能够量化感兴趣的干预措施对健康公平性影响的方法来支持决策。分布成本效益分析(DCEA)提供了一个评估健康干预措施分布影响的框架。基于DCEA,总分布成本效益分析(A-DCEA)被提出作为DCEA的一种实用且简化的替代方法。与需要详细亚组数据的完整DCEA不同,A-DCEA利用汇总数据,使其更易于获取且更广泛适用。在这篇评论中,我们讨论了A-DCEA的原理,概述了其实施步骤,并强调了其适用性。本文的目的是介绍A-DCEA,将其作为一种实用且易于使用的工具,用于评估医疗保健干预措施的公平性影响。A-DCEA可以通过将公平性考虑纳入医疗保健决策为政策制定者提供信息,特别是在由于数据限制而无法进行完整DCEA的情况下。A-DCEA为评估干预措施的分布影响提供了一种有价值且易于使用的方法,在决策中促进健康公平性。采用A-DCEA可以带来更明智的卫生政策,该政策既考虑健康不平等问题,又能有效利用资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfc3/12001684/14aaa218f615/41256_2025_415_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfc3/12001684/14aaa218f615/41256_2025_415_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfc3/12001684/14aaa218f615/41256_2025_415_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Aggregate distributional cost-effectiveness analysis: a novel tool for health economic evaluation to inform resource allocation.总体分布成本效益分析:一种用于卫生经济评估以指导资源分配的新工具。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2025 Apr 16;10(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s41256-025-00415-z.
2
Challenges and Limitations in Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: A Systematic Literature Review.分布成本效益分析中的挑战与局限:系统文献回顾。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 28;20(1):505. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010505.
3
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
4
Incorporating considerations of cost-effectiveness, affordability, and resource implications in guideline development: article 6 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.将成本效益、可负担性和资源影响因素纳入指南制定中:COPD 指南制定中整合和协调工作的第 6 条。美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会官方研讨会报告。
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):251-5. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-059ST.
5
Automated devices for identifying peripheral arterial disease in people with leg ulceration: an evidence synthesis and cost-effectiveness analysis.用于识别下肢溃疡患者外周动脉疾病的自动化设备:证据综合和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(37):1-158. doi: 10.3310/TWCG3912.
6
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
7
The Impact of Infrastructure on Low-Income Consumers' Nutritious Diet, Women's Economic Empowerment, and Gender Equality in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An Evidence and Gap Map.基础设施对低收入和中等收入国家低收入消费者营养饮食、妇女经济赋权及性别平等的影响:证据与差距图
Campbell Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 18;21(3):e70050. doi: 10.1002/cl2.70050. eCollection 2025 Sep.
8
Ambulatory Oxygen for Pulmonary Fibrosis (OxyPuF): a randomised controlled trial and acceptability study.用于肺纤维化的门诊氧疗(OxyPuF):一项随机对照试验和可接受性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul 2:1-33. doi: 10.3310/TWKS4194.
9
Management of frozen shoulder: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.冻结肩的治疗:系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(11):1-264. doi: 10.3310/hta16110.
10
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.

引用本文的文献

1
How policymakers value end-of-life treatments for rare and common diseases in China: evidence from a contingent valuation study.中国政策制定者如何看待罕见病和常见疾病的临终治疗:一项条件价值评估研究的证据
Glob Health Res Policy. 2025 Aug 26;10(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s41256-025-00434-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Synthesized economic evidence on the cost-effectiveness of screening familial hypercholesterolemia.家族性高胆固醇血症筛查的成本效益综合经济学证据。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2024 Sep 26;9(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s41256-024-00382-x.
2
An eye on equity: faricimab-driven health equity improvements in diabetic macular oedema using a distributional cost-effectiveness analysis from a UK societal perspective.关注公平:从英国社会角度出发,采用分布成本效益分析,评估 faricimab 治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿对公平性的影响。
Eye (Lond). 2024 Jul;38(10):1917-1925. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03043-y. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
3
Enhancing Neonatal Intensive Care With Rapid Genome Sequencing.
利用快速基因组测序加强新生儿重症监护。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e240097. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0097.
4
Genome Sequencing for Newborn Screening-An Effective Approach for Tackling Rare Diseases.新生儿筛查的基因组测序——应对罕见病的有效方法
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2331141. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31141.
5
Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs for Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Findings from a Retrospective US Claims Database Analysis.脊髓性肌萎缩症患者的医疗资源利用和费用:来自回顾性美国理赔数据库分析的结果。
Adv Ther. 2023 Oct;40(10):4589-4605. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02621-y. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
6
Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Treatments for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Illustration of an Aggregate Analysis and its Key Drivers.非小细胞肺癌治疗的分布成本效益分析:综合分析及其关键驱动因素的说明。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Aug;41(8):1011-1025. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01281-8. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
7
Breast Cancer Screening Should Embrace Precision Medicine: Evidence by Reviewing Economic Evaluations in China.乳腺癌筛查应拥抱精准医学:基于中国经济评估研究的证据。
Adv Ther. 2023 Apr;40(4):1393-1417. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02450-z. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
8
Inequality in mammography uptake: results from recruitment phase of first cohort study among Iranian Kurdish population.乳腺摄影普及率的不平等:伊朗库尔德人群第一队列研究招募阶段的结果。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2022 Nov 10;7(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s41256-022-00277-9.
9
Incorporating productivity loss in health economic evaluations: a review of guidelines and practices worldwide for research agenda in China.将生产力损失纳入健康经济评估:对全球指南和实践的综述,以及对中国研究议程的启示。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Aug;7(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009777.
10
Incorporating future unrelated medical costs in cost-effectiveness analysis in China.将未来无关医疗费用纳入中国成本效益分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Oct;6(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006655.