Suppr超能文献

低强度激光疗法治疗母乳喂养期间的乳头创伤和疼痛:系统评价与荟萃分析

Low-level laser therapy for nipple trauma and pain during breastfeeding: systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Gaitero Maria Victória Candida, de Mira Ticiana Aparecida Alves, Gondim Edna Jéssica Lima, do Nascimento Simony Lira, Surita Fernanda Garanhani

机构信息

Universidade Estadual de Campinas CampinasSP Brazil Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.

Universidade Federal do Ceará FortalezaCE Brazil Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2025 Mar 17;47. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2025rbgo3. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on nipple trauma and pain during breastfeeding through a systematic review with a meta-analysis of selected studies.

SOURCE OF THE DATA

A thorough search was conducted on March 22, 2022, using the databases PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, PEDro, CINAHL, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials, Web of Science, TRIP, DARE, and ProQuest. The search terms included various combinations of low-level laser therapy, nipple pain, nipple trauma, and breastfeeding.

STUDIES SELECTION

Out of 107 articles identified, only three controlled and randomized clinical trials was included. The extracted data encompassed breast and trauma characteristics, treatment types, outcomes (pain and healing process), evaluation tools, LLLT usage, laser brand, and parameters.

DATA COLLECTION

Data extraction was performed using RAYYAN for systematic reviews. The risk of bias in the studies was evaluated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Pain was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS). The included studies did not use validated tools for assessing physical conditions. All studies employed LLLT with a 660-nm wavelength, though there were variations in equipment power, energy dose, and application methods. The meta-analysis revealed an average difference of -0.60 points (95% CI: -1.52 to 0.31) in the VAS pain scores between the LLLT and control groups. No heterogeneity was observed among the studies (I2=0%), indicating no significant difference in pain relief between LLLT (red light) and control groups.

CONCLUSION

LLLT may offer a promising option for managing breastfeeding-related complications, though further research is required.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过对所选研究进行系统评价和荟萃分析,探讨低强度激光疗法(LLLT)对母乳喂养期间乳头创伤和疼痛的影响。

数据来源

2022年3月22日,使用PubMed、SciELO、LILACS、PEDro、CINAHL、EMBASE、ScienceDirect、Scopus、谷歌学术、MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆、临床试验、科学网、TRIP、DARE和ProQuest等数据库进行了全面检索。检索词包括低强度激光疗法、乳头疼痛、乳头创伤和母乳喂养的各种组合。

研究选择

在识别出的107篇文章中,仅纳入了三项对照随机临床试验。提取的数据包括乳房和创伤特征、治疗类型、结果(疼痛和愈合过程)、评估工具、LLLT使用情况、激光品牌和参数。

数据收集

使用RAYYAN进行系统评价的数据提取。评估了研究中的偏倚风险。

数据综合

使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量疼痛。纳入的研究未使用经过验证的工具来评估身体状况。所有研究均采用波长为660nm的LLLT,尽管设备功率、能量剂量和应用方法存在差异。荟萃分析显示,LLLT组和对照组之间的VAS疼痛评分平均差异为-0.60分(95%CI:-1.52至0.31)。研究之间未观察到异质性(I2=0%),表明LLLT(红灯)组和对照组在疼痛缓解方面无显著差异。

结论

LLLT可能为管理与母乳喂养相关的并发症提供一个有前景的选择,尽管还需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/050d/12002722/bd0b9c5e0a54/1806-9339-rbgo-47-e-rbgo3-gf01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验