Mahmud Ammarah, Wong Edwin S, Lewis Cara C, Ornelas India J, Wellman Robert, Pardee Roy, Mun Sophia, Piccorelli Annalisa, Westbrook Emily O, Haan Heidi Den, Brown Meagan C
Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
AJPM Focus. 2025 Feb 15;4(3):100323. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2025.100323. eCollection 2025 Jun.
The aim of this study was to assess differences in utilization outcomes among patients with social needs as part of a pilot social health integration program in 2 clinics in an integrated health system in the Pacific Northwest.
Patients who reported social needs between October 2022 and January 2023 were randomized to receive support from either local, clinic-based community resource specialists or a centralized Connections Call Center. The authors used administrative and claims data for 534 participants to compare the following utilization outcomes between arms over 9 months after randomization: primary care encounters, specialty care encounters, behavioral health encounters, emergency department encounters, inpatient admissions, urgent care encounters, and secure patient messages. Using an intent-to-treat approach, the authors used negative binomial regression models to compare visit counts and logistic regression to estimate differences in the probability of any emergency department visit or inpatient admissions between groups. The authors conducted secondary as-treated analyses comparing participants who received resource information from community resource specialists with those who did not.
Unadjusted results showed no statistically significant differences between community resource specialists and Connections Call Center. Adjusted results showed that community resource specialist participants received 1.04 more primary care encounters than Connections Call Center participants (95% CI=0.336, 1.746). As-treated results showed that participants who received support from community resource specialists had higher counts of primary care encounters, specialty care encounters, and patient messages than those who did not.
Beyond social needs navigation, clinic-based supports may be better integrated with care teams to provide ongoing support for patients' medical needs. Findings from this primary care social health pilot program showed that local, clinic-based support was associated with greater outpatient utilization than a call center support.
本研究旨在评估太平洋西北地区一个综合医疗系统中两家诊所试点社会健康整合项目中,有社会需求的患者在医疗服务利用结果上的差异。
2022年10月至2023年1月期间报告有社会需求的患者被随机分配,接受来自当地基于诊所的社区资源专家或集中式联系呼叫中心的支持。作者使用534名参与者的行政和理赔数据,比较随机分组后9个月内两组在以下医疗服务利用结果方面的差异:初级保健就诊、专科护理就诊、行为健康就诊、急诊科就诊、住院治疗、紧急护理就诊以及安全患者信息。采用意向性分析方法,作者使用负二项回归模型比较就诊次数,并使用逻辑回归估计两组之间任何急诊科就诊或住院治疗概率的差异。作者进行了二次实际治疗分析,比较了从社区资源专家处获得资源信息的参与者和未获得的参与者。
未经调整的结果显示,社区资源专家和联系呼叫中心之间没有统计学上的显著差异。调整后的结果显示,社区资源专家组的参与者比联系呼叫中心组的参与者多接受1.04次初级保健就诊(95%置信区间=0.336, 1.746)。实际治疗结果显示,从社区资源专家处获得支持的参与者在初级保健就诊、专科护理就诊和患者信息方面的次数高于未获得支持的参与者。
除了社会需求导航外,基于诊所的支持可能与护理团队更好地整合,以持续满足患者的医疗需求。这个初级保健社会健康试点项目的结果表明,当地基于诊所的支持比呼叫中心支持带来更高的门诊利用率。