Liu Caihong, Lu Yan, Zhang Baohui, Yu Liucui, He Jing, Ji Yan
Department of Prenatal Diagnostic Centre, Huizhou Central People's Hospital, Huizhou, Guangdong, China.
J Clin Lab Anal. 2025 May;39(9):e70020. doi: 10.1002/jcla.70020. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
To explore the application and value of chromosomal karyotype analysis combined with Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) in the amniotic fluid of advanced maternal age.
A total of 817 advanced maternal age (AMA) who underwent amniocentesis at the Prenatal Diagnosis Center of Huizhou Central People's Hospital between January 2018 and July 2024 were enrolled in this study. The women were grouped based on different age ranges and prenatal diagnosis factors. These groups were used to compare the detection rates and differences between chromosomal karyotype analysis and CMA.
The overall chromosomal abnormality rates detected by karyotype analysis in the 35-39 years age group and the ≥ 40 years age group were 8.81% and 13.79%, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). For CMA, the overall abnormality rates in the same age groups were 10.79% and 15.33%, respectively, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The non-solely advanced-age group (those with additional factors beyond just advanced age) had higher overall chromosomal abnormality rates, aneuploidy rates, structural abnormality rates, and mosaicism rates compared to the solely advanced-age group, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Additionally, the non-solely advanced-age group had a higher overall abnormality rate detected by CMA compared to the solely advanced-age group, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of the detection of pathogenic, likely pathogenic, and variants of uncertain significance (p > 0.05). In this study, a total of 68 cases were identified where the results of karyotype analysis and CMA were inconsistent.
The overall abnormal rate of chromosomal karyotype analysis increases with maternal age, while the overall abnormal rate of CMA shows no significant correlation with maternal age. The abnormal rates are significantly higher in AMA with additional factors. The combination of chromosomal karyotype analysis and CMA can validate and complement each other, thereby improving the detection rates of chromosomal abnormalities in amniotic fluid samples of AMA. This provides a diagnostic basis for subsequent pregnancy choices, which effectively reduces the birth of fetuses with chromosomal abnormalities and enhances population quality.
探讨染色体核型分析联合染色体微阵列分析(CMA)在高龄孕妇羊水检查中的应用及价值。
选取2018年1月至2024年7月在惠州市中心人民医院产前诊断中心行羊膜腔穿刺术的817例高龄孕妇纳入本研究。根据不同年龄范围及产前诊断因素对孕妇进行分组,比较染色体核型分析与CMA的检出率及差异。
35 - 39岁年龄组和≥40岁年龄组核型分析检测到的染色体总体异常率分别为8.81%和13.79%,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。CMA检测中,同年龄组总体异常率分别为10.79%和15.33%,但差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。非单纯高龄组(除高龄外还有其他因素)的染色体总体异常率、非整倍体率、结构异常率及嵌合率均高于单纯高龄组,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。此外,非单纯高龄组CMA检测的总体异常率高于单纯高龄组,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。但两组在致病、可能致病及意义不明确变异的检测方面差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。本研究共发现68例核型分析与CMA结果不一致的病例。
染色体核型分析总体异常率随孕妇年龄增加而升高,CMA总体异常率与孕妇年龄无显著相关性。有其他因素的高龄孕妇异常率显著更高。染色体核型分析与CMA联合可相互验证和补充,从而提高高龄孕妇羊水样本中染色体异常的检出率。这为后续妊娠选择提供诊断依据,有效减少染色体异常胎儿的出生,提高人口素质。