GENOMA- Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Rome, Italy.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2013 Jul;21(7):725-30. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.253. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
In this study, we aimed to explore the utility of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in groups of pregnancies with a priori low risk for detection of submicroscopic chromosome abnormalities, usually not considered an indication for testing, in order to assess whether CMA improves the detection rate of prenatal chromosomal aberrations. A total of 3000 prenatal samples were processed in parallel using both whole-genome CMA and conventional karyotyping. The indications for prenatal testing included: advanced maternal age, maternal serum screening test abnormality, abnormal ultrasound findings, known abnormal fetal karyotype, parental anxiety, family history of a genetic condition and cell culture failure. The use of CMA resulted in an increased detection rate regardless of the indication for analysis. This was evident in high risk groups (abnormal ultrasound findings and abnormal fetal karyotype), in which the percentage of detection was 5.8% (7/120), and also in low risk groups, such as advanced maternal age (6/1118, 0.5%), and parental anxiety (11/1674, 0.7%). A total of 24 (0.8%) fetal conditions would have remained undiagnosed if only a standard karyotype had been performed. Importantly, 17 (0.6%) of such findings would have otherwise been overlooked if CMA was offered only to high risk pregnancies.The results of this study suggest that more widespread CMA testing of fetuses would result in a higher detection of clinically relevant chromosome abnormalities, even in low risk pregnancies. Our findings provide substantial evidence for the introduction of CMA as a first-line diagnostic test for all pregnant women undergoing invasive prenatal testing, regardless of risk factors.
在这项研究中,我们旨在探索染色体微阵列分析(CMA)在一组预先认为亚微观染色体异常检测风险低的妊娠中的应用,这些妊娠通常不被认为是检测的指征,以评估 CMA 是否能提高产前染色体异常的检测率。总共对 3000 个产前样本进行了平行处理,同时使用全基因组 CMA 和传统核型分析。产前检测的指征包括:高龄产妇、母体血清筛查试验异常、超声异常发现、已知胎儿染色体异常、父母焦虑、遗传疾病家族史和细胞培养失败。无论分析的指征如何,使用 CMA 都能提高检测率。这在高风险组(超声异常和胎儿染色体异常)中显而易见,检测率为 5.8%(7/120),在低风险组,如高龄产妇(6/1118,0.5%)和父母焦虑(11/1674,0.7%)中也是如此。如果只进行标准核型分析,总共会有 24 个(0.8%)胎儿情况无法诊断。重要的是,如果只向高危妊娠提供 CMA,那么其中 17 个(0.6%)异常情况可能会被忽略。本研究结果表明,即使在低危妊娠中,更广泛地对胎儿进行 CMA 检测也会导致更高比例的临床相关染色体异常的检出。我们的研究结果为将 CMA 作为所有接受有创性产前检测的孕妇的一线诊断测试提供了充分的证据,而不考虑危险因素。