Harisinghani Mukesh, Davis Tom, Ralli George, Ferreira Carlos, Paun Bruno, Borghetto Andrea, Dennis Andrea, Jhaveri Kartik, Del Grande Filippo, Finnegan Sarah, Pansini Michele
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Perspectum Ltd, Oxford, UK.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-04941-9.
To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative MRCP-derived metrics generated from MRCP + software, designed for assessing biliary tree health.
Metric accuracy was assessed using a 3D-printed phantom containing 20 tubes with sinusoidally-varying diameters, simulating strictures and dilatations along ducts. Data from 80 participants (60 healthy volunteers and 20 with liver disease) was analysed in total. Repeatability and reproducibility of the quantitative metrics were assessed on Siemens, GE and Philips scanners at both 1.5T and 3T. All subjects were scanned on a Siemens Prisma 3T scanner which acted as the reference scanner. A subset of these participants also underwent scanning on the remaining scanners. Data from healthy volunteers was used to estimate the natural range of measured values (reference ranges). The reproducibility coefficient (RC) of 7 commonly reported quantitative metrics were compared between healthy controls and published values in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients.
The phantom analysis confirmed measurement accuracy with absolute bias of 0.0-0.1 for strictures and 0.1-0.2 for dilatations across all scanners (95% limits of agreement within ± 1.0). In vivo, RCs for the quantitative MRCP-derived metrics across the scanners ranged from: 12.4-25.4 for total number of ducts; 4.9-7.9 for number of dilatations; 3.3-6.5 for number of strictures; 4.6-9.8 mm for total length of dilatations; 26.5-51.7 mm for total length of strictures; and 4.4-6.8 for number of ducts with a stricture or dilatation. Repeatability on the same scanner was generally better than comparisons across scanners. Six metrics demonstrated sufficient cross-scanner reproducibility to distinguish healthy volunteers from PSC patients.
The precision of quantitative MRCP-derived metrics were sufficient to differentiate PSC and healthy subjects and should be well suited for multi-centre trials and assessment of biliary tree health.
评估用于评估胆管健康的MRCP+软件生成的定量磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)指标的可重复性和再现性。
使用一个3D打印的体模评估指标准确性,该体模包含20根直径呈正弦变化的管子,模拟沿胆管的狭窄和扩张。总共分析了80名参与者(60名健康志愿者和20名肝病患者)的数据。在1.5T和3T的西门子、通用电气和飞利浦扫描仪上评估定量指标的可重复性和再现性。所有受试者均在作为参考扫描仪的西门子Prisma 3T扫描仪上进行扫描。这些参与者中的一部分也在其余扫描仪上进行了扫描。来自健康志愿者的数据用于估计测量值的自然范围(参考范围)。比较了健康对照者和原发性硬化性胆管炎(PSC)患者中7个常用报告定量指标的再现性系数(RC)。
体模分析证实了测量准确性,所有扫描仪上狭窄的绝对偏差为0.0-0.1,扩张的绝对偏差为0.1-0.2(95%一致性界限在±1.0以内)。在体内,各扫描仪上定量MRCP衍生指标的RC范围为:胆管总数为12.4-25.4;扩张数为4.9-7.9;狭窄数为3.3-6.5;扩张总长度为4.6-9.8毫米;狭窄总长度为26.5-51.7毫米;有狭窄或扩张的胆管数为4.4-6.8。同一扫描仪上的可重复性通常优于不同扫描仪之间的比较。六个指标显示出足够的跨扫描仪再现性,能够区分健康志愿者和PSC患者。
定量MRCP衍生指标的精度足以区分PSC患者和健康受试者,应非常适合多中心试验和胆管健康评估。