Manders Jolein, Wijenberg Melloney, King Skye, Stapert Sven, Verbunt Jeanine, van Heugten Caroline
Department of Medical Psychology, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, The Netherlands.
Adelante Center of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology, Hoensbroek, The Netherlands.
J Neurotrauma. 2025 Aug;42(15-16):1394-1403. doi: 10.1089/neu.2024.0413. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
A subgroup of patients shows incomplete recovery after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Outcomes are commonly measured on the level of symptoms or functional recovery. An alternative way to study outcome after mTBI is to measure the level of participation. The objectives of this study were to examine (1) the level of participation in patients with mTBI at 12 months post-injury in comparison to a non-head injury orthopedic trauma control group; (2) the relationship between the outcome domains participation, functional outcome, and post-concussion symptoms. A prospective, longitudinal, multicenter cohort study was conducted. Participants were 140 adults with mTBI and 144 adults with minor (non-head) orthopedic injury. The following outcomes were measured: participation (Utrecht Scale for Evaluation and Rehabilitation-Participation: USER-P), functional outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended: (GOS-E), and post-concussion symptoms (Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: RPQ). Adults with mTBI have a significantly lower objective participation level (USER-P Frequency scale) than controls. No differences were found between the groups on subjective participation (USER-P Restrictions and Satisfaction scales) nor on functional outcome (GOS-E). Fifty-three people with mTBI (38%) had a score of ≥2 on ≥3 items, while 26 (19%) had an unfavorable USER-P outcome (≥2 restrictions) and only 9 (6.5%) had an unfavorable GOS-E score (<7). In both groups, the presence of persistent symptoms led to a significantly unfavorable outcome on both the USER-P and GOS-E. Participation frequency is lower in mTBI than in orthopedic controls, mainly determined by a significantly lower number of hours of (un)paid work, education, and/or household activities. People with mTBI more often report post-concussion symptoms, but functional recovery is not different between the groups. Participation seems to better represent incomplete recovery than functional outcome, but future research should confirm these findings.
一小部分轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)患者恢复不完全。结果通常根据症状或功能恢复水平来衡量。研究mTBI后结果的另一种方法是测量参与水平。本研究的目的是检查:(1)与非头部损伤的骨科创伤对照组相比,mTBI患者在受伤后12个月的参与水平;(2)参与、功能结果和脑震荡后症状这些结果领域之间的关系。进行了一项前瞻性、纵向、多中心队列研究。参与者为140名成年mTBI患者和144名成年轻度(非头部)骨科损伤患者。测量了以下结果:参与度(乌得勒支评估与康复参与量表:USER-P)、功能结果(扩展格拉斯哥结果量表:GOS-E)和脑震荡后症状(里弗米德脑震荡后症状问卷:RPQ)。成年mTBI患者的客观参与水平(USER-P频率量表)明显低于对照组。两组在主观参与度(USER-P限制和满意度量表)和功能结果(GOS-E)方面均未发现差异。53名mTBI患者(38%)在≥3项上的得分≥2,而26名(19%)的USER-P结果不佳(≥2项限制),只有9名(6.5%)的GOS-E得分不佳(<7)。在两组中,持续症状的存在导致USER-P和GOS-E的结果均明显不佳。mTBI患者的参与频率低于骨科对照组,主要是由于(无)薪工作、教育和/或家务活动的时间明显减少。mTBI患者更常报告脑震荡后症状,但两组之间的功能恢复没有差异。参与度似乎比功能结果更能体现恢复不完全的情况,但未来的研究应证实这些发现。