Coons James C, Wang Aolin, Latremouille-Viau Dominick, Russ Cristina, Cheng Dong, Stellhorn Robert, Dai Feng, Steffen David R, Zion Abigail, Deeba Serina, Hines Dionne M
Department of Pharmacy, UPMC Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 17;20(4):e0321106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321106. eCollection 2025.
This study aimed to describe oral anticoagulant (OAC) use among patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE).
This study included Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries (data from 1/1/2014-12/31/2019) newly diagnosed with VTE. Factors associated with being untreated with OACs in the first month from VTE (vs. OAC-treated), with receiving direct-acting OACs ([DOACs] vs. warfarin), and with extended OAC treatment (>3 months) were assessed using multivariable logistic regressions.
Overall, 169,928 patients with VTE (50.3% OAC-untreated) were included. Among the 49.7% OAC-treated patients, 74.0% used DOACs and 62.5% had extended OAC treatment. Factors associated with being untreated with OACs in the first month from VTE (odds ratio; 95% confidence interval) included Hispanic ethnicity (vs. White;1.35; 1.29-1.42), having part D low-income subsidy (1.14; 1.07, 1.20), and comorbidities such as cardiovascular diseases. Among the OAC-treated cohort, patients with index VTE diagnosis in the emergency room (vs. outpatient) setting had higher odds of receiving DOAC vs. warfarin; patients with pulmonary embolism diagnosis (vs. deep vein thrombosis) had higher odds of extended OAC treatment.
In this study of Medicare patients newly diagnosed with VTE, half of the patients were not treated with OAC in the first month from initial diagnosis. Factors such as Hispanic ethnicity, having low-income subsidy, and comorbidity burden were found to be associated with being untreated with OAC. Among OAC-treated patients, the majority were treated with DOAC vs. warfarin. Interestingly, more than a third of OAC-treated patients were not treated beyond 3 months, which warrants further investigation.
本研究旨在描述静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)患者口服抗凝剂(OAC)的使用情况。
本研究纳入了新诊断为VTE的医疗保险按服务收费受益人(2014年1月1日至2019年12月31日的数据)。使用多变量逻辑回归评估在VTE发生后的第一个月未接受OAC治疗(与接受OAC治疗相比)、接受直接作用OAC([DOAC]与华法林相比)以及延长OAC治疗(>3个月)的相关因素。
总体而言,纳入了169,928例VTE患者(50.3%未接受OAC治疗)。在49.7%接受OAC治疗的患者中,74.0%使用DOAC,62.5%接受了延长OAC治疗。在VTE发生后的第一个月未接受OAC治疗的相关因素(比值比;95%置信区间)包括西班牙裔(与白人相比;1.35;1.29 - 1.42)、享受D部分低收入补贴(1.14;1.07,1.20)以及合并症如心血管疾病。在接受OAC治疗的队列中,在急诊室(与门诊相比)确诊首发VTE的患者接受DOAC而非华法林治疗的几率更高;诊断为肺栓塞(与深静脉血栓形成相比)的患者延长OAC治疗的几率更高。
在这项针对新诊断为VTE的医疗保险患者的研究中,一半的患者在初次诊断后的第一个月未接受OAC治疗。发现西班牙裔、低收入补贴和合并症负担等因素与未接受OAC治疗有关。在接受OAC治疗的患者中,大多数接受DOAC而非华法林治疗。有趣的是,超过三分之一接受OAC治疗的患者在3个月后未继续接受治疗,这值得进一步研究。