• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对小儿阑尾炎术后医院复诊率的质量改进项目。

A quality improvement project targeting postoperative hospital revisit rates after pediatric appendicitis.

作者信息

Walser Emily, Davidson Jacob, Wigen Robin, Wilson Claire A, Seemann Natashia M, Lam Jennifer Y

机构信息

From the Division of Paediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont. (Walser, Davidson, Wilson, Seemann, Lam); the Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont. (Wigen, Seemann, Lam).

出版信息

Can J Surg. 2025 Apr 17;68(2):E137-E145. doi: 10.1503/cjs.009024. Print 2025 Mar-Apr.

DOI:10.1503/cjs.009024
PMID:40246322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12017809/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High rates of hospital revisits after pediatric appendectomy are costly to the health care system, patients, and families. We sought to trial a bundle of interventions targeted at reducing the rate of unnecessary revisits to hospital in this population.

METHODS

In February 2021, a working group of relevant stakeholders was created. In June 2021, the group developed and implemented interventions to reduce revisits in a staggered fashion. Interventions included increased education provided to patients and their families, as well as nursing staff, revised discharge pamphlets, and a post-discharge phone call from our nurse practitioner. We tracked revisit rates prospectively using run charts with comparison to historical controls.

RESULTS

We tracked revisit rates from July 2018 to October 2022. A total of 793 appendectomies were performed. There was a downward trend in revisit rates, from 16.7% before interventions to 13.4% after intervention implementation, for a relative reduction of 20%. In the postintervention period, 193 appendectomies were performed, with 78.0% contacted by our nurse practitioner in the early postoperative period. Of those contacted, 74% received the discharge pamphlet and 98.7% of respondents expressed that the phone call was useful. Almost all respondents stated they would want the follow-up phone call if they were to have another child with appendicitis.

CONCLUSION

Simple, low-cost interventions aimed at improving education at time of discharge after pediatric appendectomy were associated with a reduction in unnecessary hospital revisits. Ongoing efforts are required to sustain results and assess efficacy of bundle elements to determine if additional initiatives may be beneficial in further reductions of revisits.

摘要

背景

小儿阑尾切除术后较高的医院复诊率对医疗保健系统、患者及其家庭造成高昂成本。我们试图试验一系列干预措施,以降低该人群不必要的复诊率。

方法

2021年2月,成立了一个由相关利益相关者组成的工作组。2021年6月,该小组制定并逐步实施了减少复诊的干预措施。干预措施包括加强对患者及其家属以及护理人员的教育、修订出院宣传册,以及由我们的执业护士进行出院后电话随访。我们使用运行图前瞻性地跟踪复诊率,并与历史对照进行比较。

结果

我们跟踪了2018年7月至2022年10月的复诊率。共进行了793例阑尾切除术。复诊率呈下降趋势,从干预前的16.7%降至干预实施后的13.4%,相对降低了20%。在干预后阶段,进行了193例阑尾切除术,其中78.0%的患者在术后早期接受了我们执业护士的随访。在接受随访的患者中,74%收到了出院宣传册,98.7%的受访者表示电话随访很有用。几乎所有受访者表示,如果他们的另一个孩子患阑尾炎,他们希望能接到随访电话。

结论

旨在改善小儿阑尾切除术后出院时教育的简单、低成本干预措施与减少不必要的医院复诊相关。需要持续努力以维持成果,并评估一系列干预措施的效果,以确定是否有其他举措可能有助于进一步降低复诊率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2e5/12017809/ed1d80b91f3b/068e137f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2e5/12017809/9ebf3bf43ff0/068e137f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2e5/12017809/73082cd99cb4/068e137f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2e5/12017809/ed1d80b91f3b/068e137f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2e5/12017809/9ebf3bf43ff0/068e137f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2e5/12017809/73082cd99cb4/068e137f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2e5/12017809/ed1d80b91f3b/068e137f3.jpg

相似文献

1
A quality improvement project targeting postoperative hospital revisit rates after pediatric appendicitis.一项针对小儿阑尾炎术后医院复诊率的质量改进项目。
Can J Surg. 2025 Apr 17;68(2):E137-E145. doi: 10.1503/cjs.009024. Print 2025 Mar-Apr.
2
Facilitating factors in same-day discharge after pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy.小儿腹腔镜阑尾切除术后当日出院的促进因素
J Surg Res. 2018 Sep;229:145-149. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.072. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
3
Association of Same-Day Discharge With Hospital Readmission After Appendectomy in Pediatric Patients.小儿阑尾炎切除术后当日出院与再入院的相关性
JAMA Surg. 2017 Dec 1;152(12):1106-1112. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2221.
4
Same-Day Discharge for Nonperforated Appendicitis in Children: An Updated Institutional Protocol.儿童非穿孔性阑尾炎的当日出院:一份更新的机构方案。
J Surg Res. 2018 Dec;232:346-350. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.057. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
5
Return to the System Within 30 Days of Discharge after Pediatric Appendectomy.
Am Surg. 2016 Jul;82(7):626-31. doi: 10.1177/000313481608200729.
6
Measuring hospital quality using pediatric readmission and revisit rates.使用儿科再入院和再就诊率衡量医院质量。
Pediatrics. 2013 Sep;132(3):429-36. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3527. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
7
Extended Versus Narrow-spectrum Antibiotics in the Management of Uncomplicated Appendicitis in Children: A Propensity-matched Comparative Effectiveness Study.儿童单纯性阑尾炎管理中广谱与窄谱抗生素的应用:一项倾向评分匹配的比较有效性研究。
Ann Surg. 2018 Jul;268(1):186-192. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002349.
8
Same-day discharge after laparoscopic appendectomy for non-perforated appendicitis is safe and cost effective.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗非穿孔性阑尾炎的当日出院是安全且具有成本效益的。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2021 Jul;37(7):859-863. doi: 10.1007/s00383-021-04880-8. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
9
Leveraging the Incidence, Burden, and Fiscal Implications of Unplanned Hospital Revisits for the Prioritization of Prevention Efforts in Pediatric Surgery.利用小儿外科学中计划性医院复诊的发生率、负担和财政影响来确定预防工作的优先级。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jan;271(1):191-199. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002885.
10
A prospective study of safety and satisfaction with same-day discharge after laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎患者当日出院的安全性和满意度的前瞻性研究。
J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Feb;47(2):313-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.11.024.

本文引用的文献

1
Same-Day Discharge after Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Simple Appendicitis in Pediatric Patients-Is It Possible?小儿单纯性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术后当日出院——这可行吗?
Children (Basel). 2022 Aug 12;9(8):1220. doi: 10.3390/children9081220.
2
Institution-initiated text messaging can reduce unplanned emergency department visits after appendectomy.医疗机构发起的短信通知可以减少阑尾切除术后非计划性急诊科就诊。
J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Jan;56(1):37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.09.046. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
3
A population-based cohort examining factors affecting all-cause morbidity and cost after pediatric appendectomy: Does annual adult procedure volume matter?
基于人群的队列研究探讨影响小儿阑尾切除术后全因发病率和费用的因素:成人年度手术量是否重要?
Am J Surg. 2019 Sep;218(3):619-623. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.12.021. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
4
Leveraging the Incidence, Burden, and Fiscal Implications of Unplanned Hospital Revisits for the Prioritization of Prevention Efforts in Pediatric Surgery.利用小儿外科学中计划性医院复诊的发生率、负担和财政影响来确定预防工作的优先级。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jan;271(1):191-199. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002885.
5
Impact of outpatient management following appendectomy for acute appendicitis: An ACS NSQIP-P analysis.急性阑尾炎阑尾切除术后门诊管理的影响:一项美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划-患者分析
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Apr;53(4):625-628. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.06.023. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
6
Same-Day Discharge Following Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis as a Measure of Quality in the Pediatric Population.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗小儿单纯性急性阑尾炎后当日出院作为衡量儿科医疗质量的一项指标
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Apr;26(4):309-13. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0093. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
7
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.SQUIRE 2.0(卓越质量改进报告标准):通过详细的共识过程制定的修订版出版指南。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):986-992. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
8
Diagnosis and management of pediatric appendicitis, intussusception, and Meckel diverticulum.小儿阑尾炎、肠套叠和 Meckel 憩室的诊断与治疗。
Surg Clin North Am. 2012 Jun;92(3):505-26, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2012.03.011.