Efficacy of interventions for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome, functional abdominal pain-not otherwise specified, and abdominal migraine in children: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND

Many treatments for abdominal pain-related disorders of gut-brain interaction (AP-DGBI) in children have been studied. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of all known treatment options for paediatric AP-DGBI.

METHODS

For this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases from inception to Jan 16, 2025, for published randomised controlled trials. We included trials of any treatment for AP-DGBIs (irritable bowel syndrome, functional abdominal pain-not otherwise specified, and abdominal migraine, excluding functional dyspepsia) in children aged 4-18 years. We excluded randomised controlled trials that solely included children with functional dyspepsia, but we included studies in which children with functional dyspepsia were included alongside children with the other AP-DGBI diagnoses and outcome data could not be separated. Data extraction and quality appraisal were performed in duplicate. The primary outcome for this network meta-analysis was author-defined treatment success. Network meta-analysis methodology was used within a frequentist framework using multivariate meta-analysis and outcomes were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. Clinical relevance of effect sizes was interpreted according to consensus definitions.

FINDINGS

Of 19 337 records identified through the database search, 155 records representing 91 original randomised controlled trials were included in the network meta-analysis: these 91 trials comprised 7226 participants (4119 females and 2673 males). 12 studies assessed dietary treatments (n=730), 25 assessed pharmacological treatments (n=2140), 23 assessed probiotic treatments (n=1762), and 35 assessed psychosocial treatments (n=2952). Two treatments were probably more effective for treatment success than control treatments (moderate certainty): hypnotherapy (risk ratio [RR] 4·99 [95% CI 2·15 to 11·57]; large effect size) and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT; RR 1·99 [95% CI 1·33 to 2·98]; moderate effect size). All other treatments evaluated for treatment success were either not effective or the data were of very low certainty and thus no conclusions could be made.

INTERPRETATION

Hypnotherapy and CBT show moderate certainty for treatment efficacy with clinically relevant effect sizes. No conclusions can be made about the other therapies and treatment success due to very low evidence certainty. Future randomised controlled trials should focus on improving the evidence certainty for those other therapies with regard to core AP-DGBI outcomes.

FUNDING

None.