Functional outcomes following minimally invasive Achilles rupture repair: a retrospective comparative study of PARS and midsubstance speedbridge techniques.

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have compared patient-reported outcomes between open repair and one of either the two minimally invasive techniques for Achilles tendon rupture: Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS) and Midsubstance Speedbridge Implant System (MSB). However, no study has compared patient-reported outcomes measured by Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) and PROMIS pain interference (PI) and the Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) between PARS and MSB. Our study compared patient-reported outcomes measured by PROMIS and ATRS scores between PARS and MSB. We hypothesized that patient-reported outcomes would be similar between groups.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 434 patients who underwent Achilles rupture repair from 2018 to 2023 at a single institution. Tendinopathies, open injuries, concomitant fractures, tendon transfers, gastrocnemius recessions, and open repairs were excluded. A total of 316 patients met inclusion criteria and were contacted to complete a postoperative questionnaire containing PROMIS and ATRS. 119 (78 PARS and 41 MSB) completed all surveys and were included for final analysis. Wilcoxon rank-sum and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess differences in mean scores. Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare incidence of complications. All tests were conducted at a significance level of α = 0.05.

RESULTS

Average follow-up was 30 months at time of survey completion. There were no significant differences in PROMIS PF, PROMIS PI, and ATRS measures between groups (p > 0.05). Mean PARS PROMIS PF, PROMIS PI, and ATRS were 58.8, 44.2, and 86.0, respectively. Mean MSB PROMIS PF, PROMIS PI, and ATRS were 55.3, 44.0, and 82.5, respectively. No significant differences existed in incidence of each postoperative complication between groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In the largest study to compare patient-reported outcomes between PARS and MSB, outcomes were similar between both groups. Both techniques resulted in PROMIS PF greater than the population mean and PROMIS PI lower than the population mean. Each had similar ATRS scores. Overall, both MSB and PARS were safe and effective strategies for surgically managing Achilles ruptures.