Barroso-Castaño Patricia, Cabrera-Jaime Sandra, Feijoo-Cid Maria, Huertas-Zurriaga Ariadna, Benito Aracil Llúcia
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
NURECARE-IGTP Nursing Research Group, Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Badalona, Spain.
Nurs Open. 2025 Apr;12(4):e70201. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70201.
To identify outcome indicators to evaluate interventions delivered by advanced practice nurses specialising in acute pain as reported in the scientific literature.
Scoping review.
Three databases (PubMed, Scopus and CINAHL) were systematically searched in December 2023 to identify studies published between 1996 and 2023.
Search results were managed through the Rayyan platform. Two review authors independently performed data selection and extraction, and a third reviewer resolved conflicts.
The search identified 1263 studies. After screening titles and abstracts, 14 full-text studies were selected for data extraction and analysis. These studies encompassed a variety of designs, including randomised controlled trials, cohort studies and observational studies. The outcome indicators used to evaluate advanced practice nurses' interventions in acute pain management were examined across three key dimensions: study population and setting, intervention and model of acute pain nurse care and quality-of-care assessment. The specific outcome indicators identified included 'pain score', 'side effects', 'analgesia prescription', 'non-pharmacological interventions', 'nurses' pain management knowledge', 'patient/parent education' and 'APN contact'.
This review underscores the growing and evolving role of advanced practice nurses (APNs) in acute pain management, highlighting the diversity of care models and interventions implemented across clinical settings. Key outcome indicators, such as 'pain score', 'side effects' and 'nursing staff's understanding of pain management', were identified, with certain indicators, like 'APN contact' and 'non-pharmacological interventions', more closely linked to the nurse-led approach.
This scoping review underscores the importance of developing and evaluating outcome indicators to enhance the assessment of interventions provided by advanced practice nurses in acute pain management. While consensus on specific indicators has not yet been reached, this review highlights the need for further research to refine and standardise these indicators, thereby contributing to more uniform and comparative evaluations of care.
The identified outcome indicators can inform the evaluation of APN interventions in acute pain management, supporting efforts to optimise and standardise care. Further implementation and assessment of these indicators will be essential to enhance the quality and effectiveness of patient care.
The PRISMA extension for Scoping Review guidelines was used.
No patient or public contribution.
识别科学文献中报道的用于评估专门从事急性疼痛护理的高级实践护士所提供干预措施的结果指标。
范围综述。
2023年12月系统检索了三个数据库(PubMed、Scopus和CINAHL),以识别1996年至2023年期间发表的研究。
通过Rayyan平台管理检索结果。两名综述作者独立进行数据筛选和提取,第三名综述作者解决分歧。
检索共识别出1263项研究。在筛选标题和摘要后,选择了14项全文研究进行数据提取和分析。这些研究涵盖了多种设计,包括随机对照试验、队列研究和观察性研究。用于评估高级实践护士在急性疼痛管理中干预措施的结果指标在三个关键维度上进行了考察:研究人群和环境、干预措施以及急性疼痛护士护理模式和护理质量评估。确定的具体结果指标包括“疼痛评分”、“副作用”、“镇痛处方”、“非药物干预措施”、“护士的疼痛管理知识”、“患者/家长教育”和“高级实践护士接触”。
本综述强调了高级实践护士(APN)在急性疼痛管理中日益重要且不断演变的作用,突出了临床环境中实施的护理模式和干预措施的多样性。确定了关键结果指标,如“疼痛评分”、“副作用”和“护理人员对疼痛管理的理解”,某些指标,如“高级实践护士接触”和“非药物干预措施”,与护士主导的方法联系更为紧密。
本范围综述强调了制定和评估结果指标对于加强对高级实践护士在急性疼痛管理中提供的干预措施评估的重要性。虽然尚未就具体指标达成共识,但本综述强调了进一步研究以完善和规范这些指标的必要性,从而有助于对护理进行更统一和可比的评估。
确定的结果指标可为评估高级实践护士在急性疼痛管理中的干预措施提供参考,支持优化和规范护理的努力。进一步实施和评估这些指标对于提高患者护理质量和有效性至关重要。
使用了范围综述的PRISMA扩展指南。
无患者或公众参与。